(10-26-2019, 08:45 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(10-26-2019, 08:05 PM)MalabarJag Wrote:
You need to read more carefully. Big Oil has donated more to Climastrology than to the Skeptics, but not 99%. The "over 99%" includes ALL funding for Climate Science. I wonder why everyone seems to be on the side that gets the funding? Must be coincidence.

Why would big oil donate even one cent to someone who says their product is creating lots of long-term problems on the planet? Unless of course it's actually true?

As for your graph, I'm educating for low-carbon energy, not renewable energy. Nuclear energy is low carbon but not renewable.

France has a very low carbon electrical grid and look how inexpensive the electricity is. They rely very heavily on nuclear. 

Germany also has quite a few nuclear power plants but after 2011 they decided to shut them down.

Building a nuclear power plant is very expensive. It's even more expensive if you don't use it.  That's why Germany's costs are so high. Denmark used to import a lot of nuclear electricity from Germany but that's not there anymore. Now they are stuck importing Germany's overly expensive coal and wind based electricity instead.