(09-17-2019, 06:40 PM)Upper Wrote:

(09-17-2019, 05:27 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: So you're saying if a team traded 2 1sts for Ramsey it would be a major blunder and a disastrous decision?

It wouldn't be disastrous because Ramsey is better than Tunsil and the extra 2nd rounder is quite valuable, but I think if someone spends 2 1sts and also has to shell out a record breaking contract they will ultimately be disappointed. I don't think any non QB is worth 2 1sts.

I agree but it looks like it worked out for the Bears and Mack.  If I was the Chiefs I would do it.  That would be the only chance they have at beating the Pats is with the addition of Ramsey because we have seen him play Brown good.

---

(09-17-2019, 06:42 PM)NYC4jags Wrote:

(09-17-2019, 06:17 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Its why I asked him and not you.  There are plenty of teams that could do it if they wanted too, its just a lot to cough up.  Nobody thought the Bears were Macks destination as he came out of nowhere, same when the Brown traded for OBJ.  Teams will do it if they feel he is good enough and the missing piece.

Those are not the only factors a team must consider to spend their firsts, and no, there are not "plenty" of teams that could do it. If there are, then name them.  Most of them have already been discussed and "disqualified" in this thread. 
i.e. Miami who is in rebuild mode and wants their picks, plus Ramsey would likely not report and fight the trade.

Pretty much any team that has the cap.  It dont have to be 2 1sts next year.  It could be a 1sts in 2020 and a 1st in 2021

---