(11-02-2019, 06:06 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(11-02-2019, 05:04 PM)JagNGeorgia Wrote: I took you literally. You said “one authority” and proceeded to explain a situation where one person had the authority to issue them. If that isn’t what you meant, you should clarify it.

Look back at post #36.
It has not been edited.
"In general, in the United States, for a given subject matter and place, there is only one authority that can issue subpoenas. "

In general
For a given subject matter

I laid it out.  
Yes, certain administrative authorities like licensing boards can issue subpoenas.  But it's not as if they compete with a prosecutor when they do so.  They have a different subject matter.  A different area they look at.

You're ignoring half of what I say and then telling me I didn't put enough detail and caveats in.  You're being a donkeys butt with this.

Oh, please. In general, you’re still wrong about it. I think you think I’m more serious about this than I am. I didn’t ignore anything. You should be more clear if you didn’t mean what you said. 

The purpose of my initial comment was to show that many people can issue them. You were excusing the Dem majority from allowing the Repub minority from getting their own because that’s simply how it is everywhere... which isn’t true.

---