(08-02-2020, 09:30 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:

(08-02-2020, 09:02 AM)jagibelieve Wrote: LOL.  Your ignorance is sad, yet comical at the same time.

I've steered clear of engaging him in debate. It's obvious he has a character flaw in that he'll never admit his ignorance or that he's just flat out wrong. He'll equivocate, deflect, squirm, manipulate and downright change the subject in order to believe he's unburdened himself of an untenable argument.

That's what makes it so funny.  Let me show exhibit A.

(08-02-2020, 10:09 AM)mikesez Wrote:

(08-02-2020, 09:44 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: Do you believe an amphibious assault ship is capable of performing the duties of an angle deck carrier and vice versa?

There is certainly some overlap. The F-35B that launches off of the amphibious ship has some of the same capabilities as the f-35C that launches off of the longer carrier.
But that's not relevant to my point.
blah, blah, blah...

You didn't answer homebiscuit's simple question.

I'll give you a hint... comparing the two types of ships is like comparing an armored personnel carrier to a tank.  The soldier on the tank has some of the same capabilities as the soldier in the armored personnel carrier.

---