(08-02-2020, 04:18 PM)copycat Wrote:

(08-02-2020, 10:49 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: Yeah, I have a friend that thought he was much higher and scored a 111, which really made perfect sense to me. He was smarter than average, but he wasn't exactly bringing new stuff to the table. He was quick to learn and apply, but whenever he went off-script, it almost always resulted in disaster.

I think a good way to self-diagnose would be to answer the following question: If you were in a room with 100 random strangers, how many people would be smarter than you? If you're willing to play the game in good faith and not try to argue the details of the question, you'd probably get close to your IQ. Anyone want to answer the question?

Great question.  What is the context?  Do I have solve an algebra question?  The stress load of a 6 foot 2x4?  The nitrogen to ammonia ratio level to create a bomb?  How much current does it take to drive a 24 volt dc motor?  When to plant corn in NE Ohio vs SW Mississippi?  

I trust your IQ is sufficient to get my point.  

Not a dig at all just to be clear.  IQ means nothing in the real world.  Your potential to understand will never compare to the [BLEEP] that knows exactly what is going on.

So the context is all about what you don't know. When I ask how many people are smarter than you, I am not asking who has learned something different than you. Imagine you're in a room with 100 people and you're all given a series of questions and no one there has an advantage of pre-existing knowledge with which to answer the question. There are materials there that will help  you learn some information that is repeatable, some information needs to be applied, and there will be some deductions that need to be made. If you're being honest with yourself, out of a room of 100 people, how many there do you think would be smarter than you? 1? 5? 10? 

Of course your last point is true. I have often said that intelligence alone is not worth anything. To that end, I definitely don't tout myself as any kind of example. My wife does far greater good than I have at this point in our lives, so I don't think IQ has any stand-alone merit. Often when discussing this, people tend to mistake crystallized intelligence for fluid intelligence. IQ is an attempt to predict the former, not the later. 

Some people subscribe to the idea that IQ measures a general intelligence, also known as the G factor. People who believe that think that people with a high G factor are good at learning anything they want. Others subscribe to a multiple intelligences theory. In this theory, they think there are multiple different areas of intelligence such as linguistic or musical ability. I am not as big a fan of multiple intelligences, because it seems to be trying to build it's theory around an idea, not data.

---