(09-20-2020, 11:24 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:

(09-20-2020, 06:17 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Whatever you gotta tell yourself bud. That you have to compare human life to food with your absurd analogy spells out how immoral your position really is.

It's not immoral at all. It's common sense. Some people don't have it. Are you willing to adopt some unwanted babies if this law gets overturned?

---

(09-20-2020, 06:58 PM)copyc Wrote: Interesting that you cannot force people to be responsible for their own actions but you force other people to pay for others irresponsible actions.

I don't force anybody to do anything. I don't make rules. I have no power at all.

---

It's neither moral nor common sense to say, "Well, if we say it's not really human then there's no reason we can't kill it." And your "wanted" argument is specious because you're saying that no life is better than a potentially bad one, a decision that you make for someone else from your place of privilege. As Reagan paraphrased said, I can't help but notice that you, having already been born, favor denying that right to others and then try to call yourself moral.

---