(10-28-2020, 04:54 PM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: Can't go wrong with a cute pro-life catholic on the Supreme Court.  She got my vote.

(10-28-2020, 06:03 PM)Jags Wrote:

(10-28-2020, 04:54 PM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: Can't go wrong with a cute pro-life catholic on the Supreme Court.  She got my vote.

Ok... not trying to be mean or anything, but you must be old.  As a near 40 man, I concede in “broadening my horizons” when it comes to the female.   There are many I’d say I’m “attracted to” that were never attractive to me in the past.  I guess you can say I’ve started to “appreciate” more than I did.  I won’t act or do anything because I’m a married man.  But I feel that’s just nature/ what happens as you get older.  Not once, did it occur to me to think she was cute.  So, I guess I’ve got things to look forward to when I get older.  Everyone is “cute”.  That and you’re old.  

As a "50-something" year old man myself, I wouldn't call Justice Barrett "cute" (just talking physical attributes).  She probably was "cute" in her younger years.  I would call her "extremely attractive" more than anything else, and part of that is from her personality and the fact that she is a very intelligent woman.  If I was single and met a woman like her at her age, I would be inclined to pursue her.  She is pretty, smart and seems to have some really good core values.

---