(10-28-2020, 07:06 PM)jagibelieve Wrote:

(10-28-2020, 04:54 PM)HURRICANE!!! Wrote: Can't go wrong with a cute pro-life catholic on the Supreme Court.  She got my vote.

(10-28-2020, 06:03 PM)Jags Wrote: Ok... not trying to be mean or anything, but you must be old.  As a near 40 man, I concede in “broadening my horizons” when it comes to the female.   There are many I’d say I’m “attracted to” that were never attractive to me in the past.  I guess you can say I’ve started to “appreciate” more than I did.  I won’t act or do anything because I’m a married man.  But I feel that’s just nature/ what happens as you get older.  Not once, did it occur to me to think she was cute.  So, I guess I’ve got things to look forward to when I get older.  Everyone is “cute”.  That and you’re old.  

As a "50-something" year old man myself, I wouldn't call Justice Barrett "cute" (just talking physical attributes).  She probably was "cute" in her younger years.  I would call her "extremely attractive" more than anything else, and part of that is from her personality and the fact that she is a very intelligent woman.  If I was single and met a woman like her at her age, I would be inclined to pursue her.  She is pretty, smart and seems to have some really good core values.

Personality points are huge and overall body shape are okay.  I’ll give you that.  But the “cute” part...   that’s what I’m questioning.  I understand, if I were older, she’d probably be a gem.  I get it. We see many women on our routes and I’m almost ashamed to say we have a game in which we “call it”.  All I’m saying, is I’d have to be another 10 years older or so to “call it”.  So me calling him old (in a friendly manner) holds true.  At least to me.

---

I certainly won’t judge if a 25 yr old wants to hit it. Hell, if I was single and 25 I probably would too, even if it were just the once.

---