The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
|
Election fraud or a nothingburger?
|
(12-07-2020, 09:34 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: He didn't say neutral. He said neutral arbiter. Do you know what an arbiter is? You're killing me, dude. If you want to call a fact checker an arbiter, fine. But they should not be neutral. They should be objective. The job of a "fact checker" is to present the facts, and evaluate the case. Here are the facts, and based on all the facts we know, here is the truth. And that's what they're doing in this case. All the actual facts that we know (which are mostly the explanations of the people on the scene and people who know the process, many of them Republicans) take that idea that that film shows fraud, and completely blows it out of the water. |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 2 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.