(12-28-2020, 09:53 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:

(12-28-2020, 09:40 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: Youre the one that brought up Trask, not me.  QB is the most important position,  if you can have 2 franchise QBs and the QB is the highest rated player take him.  A lot of teams are paying 10+ mil for a good 2nd string QB.  If we did that we wouldn't have to and we would also have good trade bait for the future.  Go from no franchise QB to 2?  Im down.  Take the BAP

---

If Zack Wilson fell to the 2nd you wouldn't take him?

No. I wouldn’t.

In this hypothetical, you could just keep taking QBs because they’re the BAP. Lawerence, then Trask and then Wilson. Then what? 

If I’m taking Lawerence, I’m then surrounding him with elite talent. I’m going heavy on the OLine and Playmakers in this draft. I’m not drafting a backup QB that won’t contribute anything. Giving Lawerence a “maybe good” backup QB doesn’t help him or the team at all because if you truly believe in Lawerence, the backup QB is irrelevant. Just like every Peyton Manning and Tom Brady backup.

That would be ideal, I want to give TL the best oline and playmakers as well.  But if a defender is the highest player on my board give me the defender. A great defense could help him out as well.  Let the draft come to you and don't reach for need

---

(12-28-2020, 10:01 AM)jaguarmvp Wrote: Drafting purely BAP is a dumb as drafting strictly for need.   This team had a ton of holes and NEEDS to fix them.  Drafting more than one starting QB is just pure stupid.

Minshew will be the teams backup.

I'm not so sure about that.  If we keep Minshew then u wouldn't take Trask, but if we will be looking for a backup QB Trask in the 2nd would be a steal and we could use that 10+ mil we would sign on a backup QB to help get Trent Williams

---