Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Maxine Waters may have caused a mistrial in the trial of former Minneapolis

#1

Police officer Derek Chauvin -


"A trial of former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is going on, and instead of letting the trial take its course and not attempting to tamper with the jury as it makes its decision based on the facts of the case, Waters is telling the jury how they'd better vote:


Which is classic jury-tampering, raising the possibility that Chauvin's case is headed for a mistrial. Instead of allowing the courts to do their business and let the chips fall where they may, Waters is demanding a "guilty" verdict and vows that if there isn't one, then the protests and riots are to continue. She's still all in for "getting in their faces" as she's said in an earlier context.

Her tour of the riot scene is nothing but a bid to race-bait, jury tamper, and foment unrest in the name of keeping the racial grievance-mongering going. She's like a Sandalista, flying great distances in search of 'revolution,' while maintaining the safe haven of a wealthy home she can always fly back to after the damage is done. Laced with the hypocrisy of her own bodyguards, and the downright unethical, maybe illegal, bid to threaten a jury, it's nothing short of contemptible."



https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/202..._else.html
"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

Did she do that on purpose because they know they were losing and needed to reduce charges to win anything?

I doubt it but you never know. At the very least she needs to be charged with inciting a riot.
Reply

#3

Seeing as the jury isn't supposed to be watching the news or reading the paper, would they ever even know Al Sharpton's twin said some crazy [BLEEP] like this?
Reply

#4
(This post was last modified: 04-19-2021, 05:51 PM by homebiscuit.)

The judge says he won't grant a mistrial, but he did state to the defense attorney "Congresswoman Waters may have given you something on appeal that may result in this whole trial being overturned."

Maxine Waters is a certified idiot.
Reply

#5
(This post was last modified: 04-19-2021, 06:31 PM by StroudCrowd1.)

Lol. Even the speaker of the house can't condemn this.

They literally impeached a sitting POTUS for inciting violence and an 82 year old woman who looks like Al Sharpton will get nothing more than a wrist slap. Our democracy is broken.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

(04-19-2021, 06:20 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Lol. Even the speaker of the house can't condemn this.

They literally impeached a sitting POTUS for inciting violence and an 82 year old woman who looks like Al Sharpton will get nothing more than a wrist slap. Our democracy is broken.

The sad thing is that the perception of the words "we will peacefully go to the Capitol and make our voices heard" is supposedly "inciting a riot" at a Presidential rally.

The words "we to be got more confrontational" in a city that had been enduring rioting, looting and destruction are just "mostly peaceful protest" encouragement.


There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

#7
(This post was last modified: 04-19-2021, 07:41 PM by p_rushing.)

(04-19-2021, 05:48 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: The judge says he won't grant a mistrial, but he did state to the defense attorney "Congresswoman Waters may have given you something on appeal that may result in this whole trial being overturned."

Maxine Waters is a certified idiot.
Seems planned. If he is convicted he has an immediate appeal and it has to be granted. Then riots start everywhere. If he isn't convicted then riots start everywhere. If he is convicted without this happening then only small riots will happen.

I'm sure they want him not guilty so they get the riots.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
Reply

#8

(04-19-2021, 07:41 PM)p_rushing Wrote:
(04-19-2021, 05:48 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: The judge says he won't grant a mistrial, but he did state to the defense attorney "Congresswoman Waters may have given you something on appeal that may result in this whole trial being overturned."

Maxine Waters is a certified idiot.
Seems planned. If he is convicted he has an immediate appeal and it has to be granted. Then riots start everywhere. If he isn't convicted then riots start everywhere. If he is convicted without this happening then only small riots will happen.

I'm sure they want him not guilty so they get the riots.

Sent from my SM-T970 using Tapatalk
We live in a simulation, it's already priced in.
Your beliefs become your thoughts,
Your thoughts become your words,
Your words become your actions,
Your actions become your habits,
Your habits become your values,
Your values become your destiny.
Reply

#9

(04-19-2021, 05:48 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: The judge says he won't grant a mistrial, but he did state to the defense attorney "Congresswoman Waters may have given you something on appeal that may result in this whole trial being overturned."

Maxine Waters is a certified idiot.

Only if she sincerely cared about the outcome.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/bi...uvin-jury/
"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"
Reply

#11

I still don't understand why they're not in seclusion. They should not be going home every night having access to any outside information regarding the trial. Period.
Reply

#12
(This post was last modified: 04-20-2021, 02:58 PM by StroudCrowd1.)

WOW, a sitting POTUS weighing in on a trial still in jury deliberation.

The Supreme Court will now end up reversing any decision the jury makes based on what Slow Joe and the woman who looks like Al Sharpton did.
Reply

#13

(04-20-2021, 02:38 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: WOW, a sitting POTUS weighing in on a trial still in jury deliberation.

The Supreme Court will now end up reversing any decision the jury makes based on what Slow Joe and the woman who looks like Al Sharpton did.

Yeah I can't disagree with this. Dummies.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!





Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!