(11-07-2022, 02:02 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(11-07-2022, 01:56 PM)Cleatwood Wrote: Hahahah he edited his post because it was garbage?!

What did I edit?

---

(11-07-2022, 02:01 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: This isn't the 80s or the 90s any more. And yes, not only would I pass on CMC, every team in the first round in 2017 did too. I would not have taken ETN if I were the Jags, I might have if I was KC or the Packers or the Rams because those teams are where they need to be for the back to make a difference. With ETN this team is 1 and 5 in the last 6 games so whatever judgement you're using it's still accurate to say that a running back playing great football doesn't change the fortunes of a franchise. RBs are complementary pieces not foundational ones and this team STILL needs foundational players.

How many wins do you think this team would have of we took Moore or Barmore?  I guarantee you this team is much better with Etieene than either of them and I liked both.

We likely win more games last year since ETN didn't play at all. This year I'm not sure how to gauge it since we had so much change but our passing offense or our run defense is likely much better. In the meantime what does this team look like this year with Barmore in the middle and we don't spend all that cap money on Fatukasi and we commit to JRob as the featured back? It's hard to project what would be since we have so many variables, that's why principles matter and the guys that picked ETN aren't even here now. The ETN pick drove all kinds of additional needs this year, needs that were costly to address in free agency and the draft.

---