The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Texas Governor is a monster
|
(06-23-2021, 03:16 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:(06-23-2021, 03:08 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: Same difference. How so? Both are living creatures that people agree to take care of once they get one (kid or dog.) If dogs are gonna be viewed as property, there needs to be a designation between living property and inanimate property like cars and lawnmowers. I see way too many cases on the news where dogs are mercilessly tortured day in and day out and all the perpetrators get is a slap on the wrist. Society is getting more and more evil and laws need to be created to properly punish those people who need to be separated from the rest of society. Whether it be crimes against dogs or humans, punishments need to be much harsher. (06-23-2021, 05:31 PM)jagibelieve Wrote:(06-23-2021, 03:16 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: You do the same for your kids. Are they property? Why apply the same rules to both kids and dogs, but yet one is property and the other isn't? It makes no sense. Both are living creatures with feelings. Humans have power over dogs, so one is property and the other isn't? At one time, whites were thought to have power over blacks and one was property of the other. We have learned from that and grown. Why do we still look at dogs as property? I view my dogs as part of the family. Once you adopt or buy one, that shouldn't give people free reign to abuse them, just because they are designated as property. A dog is not the same as a car or a lawnmower. There is a major difference between livestock and companion animals. Livestock are used for food and companion animals are not. I know many people that would disagree with children being referred to as property. (06-23-2021, 05:32 PM)jagibelieve Wrote:(06-23-2021, 03:16 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: As silly as that response is, the fact is that whatever label you give them they are still property. They do and so does The O-Line. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.