Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
The proposed Unrealized Capital Gains Tax

#41

(10-28-2021, 05:15 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: It's one of the dumbest ideas in the history of dumb ideas.  Finance a huge expansion of the welfare state by confiscating the wealth of the richest Americans. 

"Hey, we don't like rich people.  They have all the money.  Let's take some of it and spend it on ourselves." 

That's all it is.  Just jealousy, greed, and wanting the government to pay for everyone to have an easier life where we don't have to work if we don't want to.

This idea is being pushed by people who don't understand how an economy works, how jobs are created, and how the wealth that we all share is created.

And the thing is, the whole plan is built on sand.  Suppose we tax the richest people based on the gains in their stock portfolios.  What if the market has a correction, say, 25%?  Do they now have a tax loss carryforward that would last for years and years while the market recovers?  Meanwhile, we would be spending trillions of additional dollars on social programs and it would then not be paid for because the billionaire tax would have failed due to the stock market correction.  And what about the trillions they propose to raise with this tax?  If the stock market has a correction, does the government now have to refund all the tax they collected?  We'd not only be paying out trillions in the new welfare state expansion, we'd also be paying out trillions additionally, right back to the billionaires who paid it in the first place.  

If you look back at the history of the United States, there are people who built this country, like Andrew Carnegie, Henry Ford, John D. Rockefeller, and more recently, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos.  And yes, they got rich doing it.  I don't mind that one bit.  They deserve it.  So much of what we have today is because of them.   Look around you at all the things you have because some guy invested a bunch of money, took a huge risk, and created a million jobs.  So what if he got rich doing it?  You benefitted, too.  You have an automobile, a personal computer, a cell phone.  Not to mention, millions of people have jobs.  

Yes, we can take their money, hand it out to everyone, and have a nice easy life for a little while.  And when the money runs out, we'll all be equal.  Equally poor.

Weird this solid post was written by someone with the opinion that it is perfectly normal to take school aged children on a field trip to a gay bar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#42

(10-28-2021, 04:31 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:
(10-28-2021, 05:15 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: It's one of the dumbest ideas in the history of dumb ideas.  Finance a huge expansion of the welfare state by confiscating the wealth of the richest Americans. 

"Hey, we don't like rich people.  They have all the money.  Let's take some of it and spend it on ourselves." 

That's all it is.  Just jealousy, greed, and wanting the government to pay for everyone to have an easier life where we don't have to work if we don't want to.

This idea is being pushed by people who don't understand how an economy works, how jobs are created, and how the wealth that we all share is created.

And the thing is, the whole plan is built on sand.  Suppose we tax the richest people based on the gains in their stock portfolios.  What if the market has a correction, say, 25%?  Do they now have a tax loss carryforward that would last for years and years while the market recovers?  Meanwhile, we would be spending trillions of additional dollars on social programs and it would then not be paid for because the billionaire tax would have failed due to the stock market correction.  And what about the trillions they propose to raise with this tax?  If the stock market has a correction, does the government now have to refund all the tax they collected?  We'd not only be paying out trillions in the new welfare state expansion, we'd also be paying out trillions additionally, right back to the billionaires who paid it in the first place.  

If you look back at the history of the United States, there are people who built this country, like Andrew Carnegie, Henry Ford, John D. Rockefeller, and more recently, Bill Gates, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos.  And yes, they got rich doing it.  I don't mind that one bit.  They deserve it.  So much of what we have today is because of them.   Look around you at all the things you have because some guy invested a bunch of money, took a huge risk, and created a million jobs.  So what if he got rich doing it?  You benefitted, too.  You have an automobile, a personal computer, a cell phone.  Not to mention, millions of people have jobs.  

Yes, we can take their money, hand it out to everyone, and have a nice easy life for a little while.  And when the money runs out, we'll all be equal.  Equally poor.

Weird this solid post was written by someone with the opinion that it is perfectly normal to take school aged children on a field trip to a gay bar.

I never said it was normal.  I said I personally would not have done it.  But I did say I don't think it would hurt them.
Reply

#43

(10-28-2021, 03:32 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(10-28-2021, 02:12 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: The cost of corporate taxes is paid by the consumer, shareholder, corporations are just tax collectors who pass is through to the king. If their taxes go up so will the cost of everything they sell, dividends and reinvestment will be reduced hence the exacerbation of our inflation reduction in stock prices

Prices are set by markets. Corporate taxes are taken on profits, not revenue.  It wouldn't be like a sales tax.

Prices are set by the market in a Free Market, which does not apply to our economy.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

#44

(10-28-2021, 05:04 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:
(10-28-2021, 03:32 PM)mikesez Wrote: Prices are set by markets. Corporate taxes are taken on profits, not revenue.  It wouldn't be like a sales tax.

Prices are set by the market in a Free Market, which does not apply to our economy.

Our market is not totally free, no, but it's free enough that my statement is true.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#45

Tethering is the way to solve this. I'm convinced of it.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#46

(10-28-2021, 03:32 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(10-28-2021, 02:12 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: The cost of corporate taxes is paid by the consumer, shareholder, corporations are just tax collectors who pass is through to the king. If their taxes go up so will the cost of everything they sell, dividends and reinvestment will be reduced hence the exacerbation of our inflation reduction in stock prices

Prices are set by markets. Corporate taxes are taken on profits, not revenue.  It wouldn't be like a sales tax.

When corporate taxes are raised, corporations respond by raising prices to counter the reduced profit, or by cutting costs (laying off people, delaying capital expenditures, etc.)  You want economic growth - lower taxes, not raise them.
Reply

#47

Conservatives need to stop buying this tripe as it pertains to the ultra rich.
Reply

#48

(10-28-2021, 09:09 PM)navyjagfan Wrote:
(10-28-2021, 03:32 PM)mikesez Wrote: Prices are set by markets. Corporate taxes are taken on profits, not revenue.  It wouldn't be like a sales tax.

When corporate taxes are raised, corporations respond by raising prices to counter the reduced profit, or by cutting costs (laying off people, delaying capital expenditures, etc.)  You want economic growth - lower taxes, not raise them.

Simply incorrect.  We've had healthy economic growth with tax rates higher than they are now and crashes with tax rates lower than they are now.  Simply because right wing talk radio has preached it for years does not make it true.

Back to the point, shareholders feel the immediate pain of higher corporate taxes.  Consumers and employees might feel secondary effects way down the road, but that's not a given.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#49

NYU professor takes apart the "billionaires tax."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zng_l4avzYo
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#50
(This post was last modified: 10-31-2021, 02:34 PM by KingIngram052787. Edited 1 time in total.)

(10-27-2021, 04:56 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(10-27-2021, 04:08 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Lol, just wait until they start talking about all those unrealized gains in those IRAs just sitting there waiting to be milked.

I think the idea to cap the value of an IRA has more merit.  Once your IRA is over a few million dollars you should have to roll some of it into an account that isn't sheltered.  There are people with over a billion dollars in their IRAs and that's just ridiculous and corrupt.   Not saying the government should confiscate all that, but I am saying above a certain value it should become taxable.

There's caps on what you can put in, those people took significant risks to build that value and they were either really smart or got really lucky.  Good for them, keep the government hands out of it.

Edit: Also, if it's a traditional IRA and was tax free going in, it'll be taxed coming out at some point. We can't be double and triple taxing everything.
Reply

#51

(10-31-2021, 02:30 PM)KingIngram052787 Wrote:
(10-27-2021, 04:56 PM)mikesez Wrote: I think the idea to cap the value of an IRA has more merit.  Once your IRA is over a few million dollars you should have to roll some of it into an account that isn't sheltered.  There are people with over a billion dollars in their IRAs and that's just ridiculous and corrupt.   Not saying the government should confiscate all that, but I am saying above a certain value it should become taxable.

There's caps on what you can put in, those people took significant risks to build that value and they were either really smart or got really lucky.  Good for them, keep the government hands out of it.

Edit: Also, if it's a traditional IRA and was tax free going in, it'll be taxed coming out at some point.  We can't be double and triple taxing everything.

It wouldn't be a double tax. If it's a traditional IRA with hundreds of millions in it, the money would roll into a regular account and get taxed once.
Also, don't be naive, they didn't take risks. They got special deals from their friends. They made a shell corporation just to filter income through it and make it look like capital gains. It's the kind of trick that becomes very easy to do with today's tax code, when you have tens of millions of dollars.  Do you want to buy into a shell corporation like that? Sorry! They are not traded publicly. Since there is only one buyer, the price can be low going in, and since there's only one seller they can conspire to make the price high going out.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#52

(10-31-2021, 05:23 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(10-31-2021, 02:30 PM)KingIngram052787 Wrote: There's caps on what you can put in, those people took significant risks to build that value and they were either really smart or got really lucky.  Good for them, keep the government hands out of it.

Edit: Also, if it's a traditional IRA and was tax free going in, it'll be taxed coming out at some point.  We can't be double and triple taxing everything.

It wouldn't be a double tax. If it's a traditional IRA with hundreds of millions in it, the money would roll into a regular account and get taxed once.
Also, don't be naive, they didn't take risks. They got special deals from their friends. They made a shell corporation just to filter income through it and make it look like capital gains. It's the kind of trick that becomes very easy to do with today's tax code, when you have tens of millions of dollars.  Do you want to buy into a shell corporation like that? Sorry! They are not traded publicly. Since there is only one buyer, the price can be low going in, and since there's only one seller they can conspire to make the price high going out.

Thank God you aren't in charge of anything.
Reply

#53

(10-31-2021, 05:35 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:
(10-31-2021, 05:23 PM)mikesez Wrote: It wouldn't be a double tax. If it's a traditional IRA with hundreds of millions in it, the money would roll into a regular account and get taxed once.
Also, don't be naive, they didn't take risks. They got special deals from their friends. They made a shell corporation just to filter income through it and make it look like capital gains. It's the kind of trick that becomes very easy to do with today's tax code, when you have tens of millions of dollars.  Do you want to buy into a shell corporation like that? Sorry! They are not traded publicly. Since there is only one buyer, the price can be low going in, and since there's only one seller they can conspire to make the price high going out.

Thank God you aren't in charge of anything.

You're some kind of financial advisor, yes?  Any of your clients have IRAs in the tens of millions?
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#54

(10-31-2021, 07:44 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(10-31-2021, 05:35 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: Thank God you aren't in charge of anything.

You're some kind of financial advisor, yes?  Any of your clients have IRAs in the tens of millions?

I have never met anyone with an IRA in the tens of millions. Anyone with that net worth isn't dumb enough to keep their assets in an IRA.

The problem with you and the people who think like you is that you don't understand they will do whatever is necessary to avoid the tyrannical policies people like you promote.
Reply

#55

I wish people could travel overseas and see Russia, Cuba, Europe, the Middle East, South America, Southwest Asia.

Once you've traveled the world, you know without a doubt that there is no better place to be than America.
Reply

#56
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2021, 07:01 AM by mikesez.)

(10-31-2021, 11:09 PM)navyjagfan Wrote: I wish people could travel overseas and see Russia, Cuba, Europe, the Middle East, South America, Southwest Asia. 

Once you've traveled the world, you know without a doubt that there is no better place to be than America.

Have you actually seen Germany?

(10-31-2021, 10:12 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:
(10-31-2021, 07:44 PM)mikesez Wrote: You're some kind of financial advisor, yes?  Any of your clients have IRAs in the tens of millions?

I have never met anyone with an IRA in the tens of millions. Anyone with that net worth isn't dumb enough to keep their assets in an IRA.

The problem with you and the people who think like you is that you don't understand they will do whatever is necessary to avoid the tyrannical policies people like you promote.

Mitt Romney released his tax returns and revealed that he has over 100 million dollars in an IRA.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

#57

(10-31-2021, 10:12 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:
(10-31-2021, 07:44 PM)mikesez Wrote: You're some kind of financial advisor, yes?  Any of your clients have IRAs in the tens of millions?

I have never met anyone with an IRA in the tens of millions. Anyone with that net worth isn't dumb enough to keep their assets in an IRA.

The problem with you and the people who think like you is that you don't understand they will do whatever is necessary to avoid the tyrannical policies people like you promote.

Peter Thiel has $5 billion in a Roth IRA
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#58
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2021, 08:08 AM by StroudCrowd1.)

(11-01-2021, 06:59 AM)mikesez Wrote:
(10-31-2021, 11:09 PM)navyjagfan Wrote: I wish people could travel overseas and see Russia, Cuba, Europe, the Middle East, South America, Southwest Asia. 

Once you've traveled the world, you know without a doubt that there is no better place to be than America.

Have you actually seen Germany?

(10-31-2021, 10:12 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: I have never met anyone with an IRA in the tens of millions. Anyone with that net worth isn't dumb enough to keep their assets in an IRA.

The problem with you and the people who think like you is that you don't understand they will do whatever is necessary to avoid the tyrannical policies people like you promote.

Mitt Romney released his tax returns and revealed that he has over 100 million dollars in an IRA.

The balance of an IRA is not reported on your tax return.

(11-01-2021, 07:47 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:
(10-31-2021, 10:12 PM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: I have never met anyone with an IRA in the tens of millions. Anyone with that net worth isn't dumb enough to keep their assets in an IRA.

The problem with you and the people who think like you is that you don't understand they will do whatever is necessary to avoid the tyrannical policies people like you promote.

Peter Thiel has $5 billion in a Roth IRA

Site cannot be reached.
Reply

#59
(This post was last modified: 11-01-2021, 08:57 AM by The Real Marty. Edited 2 times in total.)

(11-01-2021, 08:08 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:
(11-01-2021, 06:59 AM)mikesez Wrote: Have you actually seen Germany?


Mitt Romney released his tax returns and revealed that he has over 100 million dollars in an IRA.

The balance of an IRA is not reported on your tax return.

(11-01-2021, 07:47 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: Peter Thiel has $5 billion in a Roth IRA

Site cannot be reached.

Try this one

Or, simply google "Peter Thiel IRA."

It's really a beautiful scheme, and completely legal.  Thiel used his Roth IRA to buy shares in Paypal when it was a startup.  Now the value has grown into the billions, and he can sell them and owe no tax.

But back to your statement that "...anyone with that net worth isn't dumb enough to hold their assets in an IRA..."  The only thing that would hold them back would be the annual contribution limits.  Otherwise, it would be wonderful to hold assets in a Roth IRA, where the assets will never be taxed, even if they grow to the moon and you sell them.
Reply

#60

(11-01-2021, 08:49 AM)The Real Marty Wrote:
(11-01-2021, 08:08 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: The balance of an IRA is not reported on your tax return.


Site cannot be reached.

Try this one

Or, simply google "Peter Thiel IRA."

It's really a beautiful scheme, and completely legal.  Thiel used his Roth IRA to buy shares in Paypal when it was a startup.  Now the value has grown into the billions, and he can sell them and owe no tax.

Well that is good for him, but clearly an outlier, and I think he should keep every dime of it and never be threatened with paying taxes on a Roth IRA because that is sort of the agreement when you set it up.
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!