Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Democrats continue to want to violate the Constitution, threaten the 2nd amendment

#13

(05-23-2022, 12:48 PM)mikesez Wrote:
(05-23-2022, 12:35 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: Yes, the line is criminal history and property rights. If you commit a specific class of crime then you lose your freedom to own a firearm. In that sense I do not oppose background checks and the like. For the second, if I don't want you on my property with your gun then you can't bring it there. That goes for me, you, Publix, McDonalds, or any other person with legitimate property rights. Otherwise? Have at it.

I agree with all of that.  
I don't think it's a good idea for any state or locality to try to ban specific weapon types or upgrades or try to ban gun stores.  It just doesn't work.  It's too easy to bring something in from another state or county.  
But I do think it's a good idea for states and counties and even cities to have their own rules about carrying loaded weapons.  Open carry works fine in some places.  In other places concealed works best.  Some places it makes sense to require a class for a permit, other places it doesn't.  Some places it makes sense to restrict what people over 18 but under 21 can own, in other places it doesn't.  We have to let federalism do its work in these areas.

See, that's where we diverge. I don't think any of those things should be permitted to be regulated.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Democrats continue to want to violate the Constitution, threaten the 2nd amendment - by flsprtsgod - 05-23-2022, 03:09 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 05-26-2022, 02:42 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by Bchbunnie4 - 05-26-2022, 02:49 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 05-26-2022, 03:03 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by WingerDinger - 05-26-2022, 06:14 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 05-30-2022, 09:55 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by Caldrac - 05-30-2022, 10:05 AM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 05-31-2022, 09:00 AM



Users browsing this thread:
5 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!