Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Democrats continue to want to violate the Constitution, threaten the 2nd amendment


(05-31-2022, 09:26 AM)The Drifter Wrote: I think I'm going to answer my own question I posed here. The answer to the question should be self evident and right in front of our faces. You see, back in the 1950's and even in to the 1960's, we still allowed the concept of God in our schools which gave us a sense of morality. We stressed good citizenship and a love of our country, and like JFK once said, "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country". The concept that the individual would be held acountable for their actions was in full force back. then. But somewhere along trhe way, we either lost, or had these basic principles taken away from us by various liberal individuals or groups. And thus began the downfall of our once great, and proud nation.

Many people have said the same thing over the years. 
But if you look back on where public schooling became less religious and where even the pledge of allegiance became optional, it was minority religious groups who sued and brought these changes.
Only later did many individuals decide not to identify with a religion at all.  Only later do we see the emergence of the "nones".  
These types of instruction and prayer would be just as oppressive to the kids of religious minorities today as they were then.  
And with so many "nones" out there, there is even less will to ignore that fact than there was back then.
My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



Messages In This Thread
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 05-26-2022, 02:42 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by Bchbunnie4 - 05-26-2022, 02:49 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by mikesez - 05-26-2022, 03:03 PM
RE: homebiscuit - by WingerDinger - 05-26-2022, 06:14 PM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 05-30-2022, 09:55 AM
RE: homebiscuit - by Caldrac - 05-30-2022, 10:05 AM
homebiscuit - by homebiscuit - 05-31-2022, 09:00 AM
RE: Democrats continue to want to violate the Constitution, threaten the 2nd amendment - by mikesez - 05-31-2022, 10:45 AM



Users browsing this thread:
6 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!