(01-09-2024, 11:19 AM)Caldrac Wrote:

(01-09-2024, 11:16 AM)Khan Artist Wrote: I think we need to bring him back for sure.  To get 1k yards and 8 TDs with how bad the offense was this year is impressive

He also left a lot out there on the football field with the drops. He was probably closer to 1200 yards and 12 TD's if they just hit on some of those bigger plays earlier on in September. He also drew a [BLEEP] TON of pass interference and defensive holding calls his way which only bodes well for his continued development in this offense in year two. 

We'd be foolish, again, as long as the price is fair, to let him walk in the off season. Because, I am telling you, he'll end up on another play-off team in free agency and it'll probably come back to haunt us. Nightmare scenario, he ends up with the Chiefs, Bills or Bengals and puts them over the hill.

That's a reason not to go too hard after him actually.  That one clip someone posted of Trevor's receivers letting him down through out the year was pretty damning on Ridley.  A lot of those were in key moments as well.

---

(01-09-2024, 11:43 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:

(01-09-2024, 11:40 AM)Jaguarmeister Wrote: The 3rd is gone.  It's the trade comp for playing more than 60% of snaps this year or some similar number.  The only way we get the 3rd back is if it turns into a 2nd.

I know this, I'm saying it's a no brainer we we can somehow bring him back some how without giving up the 2nd.  I haven't seen a answer on if we tag Ridley if that counts as an extension and if it turns into a 2nd or not.  That's what I'm trying to find out.  Nobody knows the answer

Spotrac says the stipulation is "in season extension".  That sounds to me like at the very least if you let him hit free agency but then outbid or he just wants to sign here the 2nd is off the table.  The gray area is "in season" already behind us which would make the tag viable if so.  I don't think you tag him regardless though.  You have to save that for Allen.

---