(01-01-2023, 09:40 PM)mikesez Wrote:

(01-01-2023, 09:04 PM)NewJagsCity Wrote: The birther in this case still had a uterus. So biologically it was still a female, and it chose to conveniently renonuce its emotional commitment to transgenderism and appropriate the sex that it was assigned all along in order to respond to maternal feelings that it was correctly born with before it made the choice to pervert biology and go down the twisted road of transgenderism.  It renounced transgenderism with this action, and probably doesnt even realize it.  And it is now most likely being lauded as brave and a hero.  For behaving the way it was designed. There is no wrong with this movement. Just self-applied bravery and courage.

And, btw, did i miss something? Doesnt the partner with the [BLEEP] eating grin have any sperm to contribute?  Or is that one originally a female?  Why was a donor needed?

---

This is a political topic, because the advocates of this are making it as such, and thus is fair game for commentary of any kind.
But by all means, please feel free to follow your own advice.

How are the adults and child in that Twitter post making their situation a political topic?