Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Another reason to quit funding Planned Parenthood with Tax Dollars

#1

Oh how this disgust me..........

Planned Parenthood director claims kids are 'sexual beings' from birth while promoting 'useful' porn literacy

Fox News Digital found that Taverner's position did not appear to be at odds with that of Planned Parenthood

An executive director at a Planned Parenthood's sex education arm claimed that children are born "sexual" while simultaneously advocating for comprehensive sex education from kindergarten through 12th grade and porn literacy for certain ages, Fox News Digital found.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/planned-pa...n-literacy
Instead of a sign that says "Do Not Disturb" I need one that says "Already Disturbed Proceed With Caution."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

That's straight out of progressive philosophy. It's why I get so annoyed at moderates. Moderates know almost nothing about the true agenda of progressive ideology, yet they hear the word "progressive" and think, "Hey, that's me.... I want to be progressive." It's all one giant con job with over 100 years of intentional manipulation of language and legitimate conspiracies to upend the cultural norms in societies.

Progressives don't believe in child innocence, which is why they are happy to sexualize children and open to pedophilia. This comes from the postmodern branch of the tree, of which many philosophers did not see sexual relationships with children as necessarily bad, considering that morality was relative. While this is not something I think the average person (even the average progressive) would condone, it is not uncommon for the leaders of this movement to both know about the origins of this philosophy and to share this idea that kids can be sexualized.
Reply

#3

I'm starting to believe that the D in Democrat actually stands for Diddle..
[Image: SaKG4.gif]
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!