(11-17-2023, 08:17 AM)SamusAranX Wrote:

(11-17-2023, 07:48 AM)SeldomRite Wrote: It's hilarious that this thread is at twenty pages and people still don't understand what "generational talent" means.

Let me clarify it, for the mongoloids among us, it's about his talent, not whether he'll be a hall of fame QB, his talent level as a prospect.

His size combined with his arm strength and flexibility combined with his mental acuity combined with his athleticism combined with his intangibles.

Nothing at this point is changing his status as a generational talent (though you can argue about whether that assessment of his talent was correct), the only question at this point is how successful his career will be.

This. Andrew luck was considered generational. Yet never won a championship….im having trouble thinking of the major reason as to why that was…and why he retired. Maybe someone can help me out