(12-25-2023, 10:49 PM)Caldrac Wrote: Not defending Lawrence. His turnovers are bad. Period. Has to get better. Hence the Josh Allen contract range talk earlier.

However. I just think it's funny that this team got it's [BLEEP] handed to it by both of these teams and they have VASTLY superior line play on both sides and VASTLY superior run games and defenses.

I am told I should lose all hope with a QB that's 24 years old in year 3 of his career and year 2 of this current staff after inheriting a team that was void of talent to the tune of getting the top pick in back to back drafts.

The 49ers were so talented they could overcome a bad trade deal they took on with Lance. The Ravens have been competent for years now. Thanks to good drafting that goes back to Ozzie Newsome.

But, yeah, let's beat Lawrence to death on a team that finished 9 - 8 last year and is 8 - 7 STILL hanging onto a divisional lead with a bum ankle, bum knee, concussion and now a bad shoulder.

Predominately due to playing behind a VASTLY inferior line with a VASTLY irrelevant running game where he's lead the team in rushing yardage at least twice this season and is technically now playing with his third different play caller in three straight years...

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

We're 161 pages in.

There are three kinds of posters on this thread at this point: people that understand Trevor is good and seeing him unable to succeed when the entire team is breaking down around him won't change that reality, people who don't have any ability to separate the player from the statistical performance who will gyrate wildly between calling for Trevor's lionization and calling for his benching, and trolls that will show up when the circumstances allow to try to irritate people.

In any case there isn't a point in arguing about Trevor at this point. He's going to get paid and have a career as a starting NFL quarterback for as long as his health and desire allow for it.

---