(01-21-2024, 05:46 PM)SeldomRite Wrote:

(01-21-2024, 05:28 PM)SuperJville Wrote: That list linked up there is just nonsense.

Browning higher than Mahomes

Lamar being rated lower than Trevor, also laughable.

So the list is just wrong / don’t care about what their methodology is - if that is their outcome then you know it’s problematic

All the list does is quantify what a relative qb performance is for an average given performance around them.

Some guys had exceptional play around them, so they seemed to perform well, but actually performed below what would be expected given the level of play around them, while a lot of guys were mostly the same, because they play to the level of their help.

Essentially what the guy calculated is that Trevor's performance was actually very high compared to the expected performance given all the problems around him, which is correct. Trevor played well, even if the bib brigade and troll troupe don't want to admit it.

I’ve watched Trevor’s every single play and throw. I’ve watched football for decades. Everyone paying attention understands Trevor had a bit of a down year. We know he had a bad offensive line - but even counting all of that, he had plenty of his own plays that need to be cleaned up.  He’s a top half of the league type of qb right now. But he’s 24 and can easily climb and become a top 10 qb soon and maybe even a top 5 qb if he plays at a high level consistently.

---