Quote:"By the way, under those eight years before Obama came along, we didn't have any successful radical Islamic terrorist attack in the United States. They all started when, [ugh] Clinton and Obama got in office."

<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/15/politics/rudy-giuliani-donald-trump-9-11-terror-attack/index.html?sr=twCNN081616rudy-giuliani-donald-trump-9-11-terror-attack0119AMVODtopVideo&linkId=27699753'>http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/15/politics/rudy-giuliani-donald-trump-9-11-terror-attack/index.html?sr=twCNN081616rudy-giuliani-donald-trump-9-11-terror-attack0119AMVODtopVideo&linkId=27699753</a>

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://youtu.be/5AGeel-VeeY'>https://youtu.be/5AGeel-VeeY</a>

Skip to 9:12


If it wasn't so sad, I'd probably be laughing but alas, this is real life.


Edit: title may be misleading; should it be Guiliani denies 9/11? I'm just dumbfounded.

Well, if you and your fellow buddies on the left in this thread have proven one thing, it's that you'll take whatever CNN spoon feeds you and believe it to be gospel.  You posted a link to the full speech, but clearly you only watched the edited version CNN felt you needed to see.  He didn't deny 9/11.  It was referenced multiple times during the speech.  His point was that after 9/11, there wasn't another attack on the US homeland until after Obama took office.  His point was spot on.  It was 8 years and 2 months between 9/11, and the Fort Hood shootings in November 2009.  That was the first mass casualty incident in the United States attributed to radical Islamic terror. 

 

But hey, why quibble over facts when you can start another anti-Trump thread, right?  As long as we're not talking about Hillary, all is good.

---