Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Clinton IT specialist invokes 5th more than 125 times in deposition

#1


Clinton IT specialist invokes 5th more than 125 times in deposition
 

Hillary Clinton IT specialist Bryan Pagliano invoked the Fifth more than 125 times during a 90-minute, closed-door deposition Wednesday with the conservative watchdog Judicial Watch, a source with the group told Fox News.

The official said Pagliano was working off an index card and read the same crafted statement each time.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2016/06/...latestnews


Instead of a sign that says "Do Not Disturb" I need one that says "Already Disturbed Proceed With Caution."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#2

Typical democrat. Has to read a 4 word statement off an index card.


Reply

#3

Waterboard his [BLEEP].


Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 
Reply

#4

Quote:Typical democrat. Has to read a 4 word statement off an index card.
 

Typical Trumpette, resorting to hyperbole. It's probably more than 4 words, but that requires a thumb, thus complicating the counting process.

If something can corrupt you, you're corrupted already.
- Bob Marley

[Image: kiWL4mF.jpg]
 
Reply

#5

Meanwhile he's got an immunity deal in place with the Justice Department and is working with them.


Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=59]
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#6

Quote:Meanwhile he's got an immunity deal in place with the Justice Department and is working with them.


That doesn't scream 'guilty' at all. /sarcasm
Reply

#7

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iqfZTR-BUAs

 

You read the report and draw your own conclusions says Gowdy? These are reporters. Why do I want their conclusive opinions? How about just the facts. You guys spent $7 MILLION on the investigation. You cant give a definitive answer? 

No..Mr Gowdy. You tell us the conclusion and lets move forward. Either press charges, locker her up, do what the law says. Or...shut the [BAD WORD REMOVED] up, move on and save us some money.

It appears there is no "smoking gun". If she lied and people died, she deserves the same treatment others got, whether it be Cheney, Rummy, W, Bill, ...wait...nevermind


Blakes Life Matters
Reply

#8

You need someone to spoon feed the talking points to you?  Can't read the report for yourself?  His point was pretty clear.  Rather than ask loaded questions trying to defend your pantsuit princess, read the report, and the addendum that was written by Senator Jim Jordan from Ohio. 


Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.
[Image: attachment.php?aid=59]
Reply

#9

Quote:You need someone to spoon feed the talking points to you?  Can't read the report for yourself?  His point was pretty clear.  Rather than ask loaded questions trying to defend your pantsuit princess, read the report, and the addendum that was written by Senator Jim Jordan from Ohio. 
No. I wasnt part of the investigation and a $7 million expenditure. Is it the medias job to read it? Perhaps. But personally...there was an investigation, no one knew what really happened, finally an investigation ends. After tax money was spent by our representatives, these representatives can let us all know what the outcome was, and if this Presidential candidate would be, as many alleged,  disqualified and/or sent to prison.

So, Im not defending any "pantsuit princess" any more than pushing for your Chinese tie wearing Prince..your Orange Crush

We've heard so much about this, with an huuuggge amount of monies spent. Just tell us. Guilty? Charges? Irresponsible? Laws Broken? 

Is there a smoking gun, or smoke blowing out of someones piss. 

Blakes Life Matters
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#10

What I gather from this...  it's not so much that Hillary Clinton broke the law regarding the Benghazi incident.  Incompetence on her part as well as the rest of the current administration?  Absolutely.  The fact of the matter is there were probably no laws broken directly related to the incident other than her illegal email server, but that's a whole other issue.

 

It's the fact that she, along with the rest of the current administration knew that it was a terrorist act and it was not based on some youtube video.  It shows a deliberate attempt to lie and try to deceive the American people.

 

When news of the attack came out, we were told that it was a "spontaneous protest" regarding a youtube video, yet while the attack was happening she sent an email to her daughter saying that it was an "Al-Qaeda style group".

 

There were many warning signs that went ignored and assets that weren't utilized prior to and during the attack.

 

The bottom line is, it was incompetence and pretty much a "cover up".  Do we really want to elect someone who was incompetent in her previous job and will lie in order to cover up said incompetence?




There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

#11

Quote:What I gather from this...  it's not so much that Hillary Clinton broke the law regarding the Benghazi incident.  Incompetence on her part as well as the rest of the current administration?  Absolutely.  The fact of the matter is there were probably no laws broken directly related to the incident other than her illegal email server, but that's a whole other issue.

 

It's the fact that she, along with the rest of the current administration knew that it was a terrorist act and it was not based on some youtube video.  It shows a deliberate attempt to lie and try to deceive the American people.

 

When news of the attack came out, we were told that it was a "spontaneous protest" regarding a youtube video, yet while the attack was happening she sent an email to her daughter saying that it was an "Al-Qaeda style group".

 

There were many warning signs that went ignored and assets that weren't utilized prior to and during the attack.

 

The bottom line is, it was incompetence and pretty much a "cover up".  Do we really want to elect someone who was incompetent in her previous job and will lie in order to cover up said incompetence?
Wont argue that. Proving it is the issue. After $7 million spent I woulda thought they had something sunstantial. She pissed up, but was it intentional? The excuses surrounding it all was total bull. Can she get arrested? Just deny it. I dont trust her, but that doesnt mean I get in line for Mr.Agent Orange either

It may end up helping her now, and claim witch hunt. All in all, it Abbott or Costello for choices in being the "most powerful person in the world" Mmmm...warm and fuzzies

Blakes Life Matters
Reply

#12

I would've invoked the 5th, too. People just kind of end up dead around Hillary Rodham.
Reply

#13

Quote:It's the fact that she, along with the rest of the current administration knew that it was a terrorist act and it was not based on some youtube video.  It shows a deliberate attempt to lie and try to deceive the American people.

 
 

Worse than that. In order to prop up the lie, the guy who made the video was sentenced to a year in jail.





                                                                          

"Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#14

Quote:I would've invoked the 5th, too. People just kind of end up dead around Hillary Rodham.
Especially State Troopers on her security staff years ago.

Looking to troll? Don't bother, we supply our own.

 

 
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!