Well, well.  It looks like there was certainly some snooping going on.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

And yet Susan Rice could legally unmask as well. Find the leaker and let's talk.

 

Yes she can/could, but for what purpose?  Don't you find it the least bit ironic that the data was leaked PRIOR to the 0bama regime leaving the White House?

 

Why would Susan Rice (then National Security Adviser) need to obtain information specifically connected to the then Trump campaign?

 

This has nothing to do with national security and everything to do with politics.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Yes she can/could, but for what purpose? Don't you find it the least bit ironic that the data was leaked PRIOR to the 0bama regime leaving the White House?


Why would Susan Rice (then National Security Adviser) need to obtain information specifically connected to the then Trump campaign?


This has nothing to do with national security and everything to do with politics.

Not sure I agree. What with the news of secret back channel meetings and all.

---

Not sure I agree. What with the news of secret back channel meetings and all.

 

Secret back channel meetings?

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

Secret back channel meetings?

 

Yeah, Clinton's meeting on the tarmac with the AG wasn't secret or back channel at all. It was right out there for everyone to see that Shrill was untouchable.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

It still doesn't validate his tweet.


Maybe he should tell his inner circle to be less shady?

It's really starting to look like he was right.  You better whip up the spin machine quickly because this isn't going well for you, snowflake.

 

I know this is a tough pill to swallow for someone who leans to the left as far as you do, but it's clear now that they had him under surveillance going back as far as July of last year.  You just keep on spinning it however MSNBC/CNN tells you to.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Yes she can/could, but for what purpose?  Don't you find it the least bit ironic that the data was leaked PRIOR to the 0bama regime leaving the White House?

 

Why would Susan Rice (then National Security Adviser) need to obtain information specifically connected to the then Trump campaign?

 

This has nothing to do with national security and everything to do with politics.

 

You're not going to find an iota of curiosity coming from Indy.  That would go against the very core of his viewpoint which is pretty much "regurgitate whatever MSNBC / CNN tells me to say and nothing more.  If they're not saying it, neither am I."

 

Not sure I agree. What with the news of secret back channel meetings and all.

 

The general counsel of the White House providing findings of an internal investigation to the head of the committee investigating this stuff is hardly back channel or nefarious.  I know you need to make it seem that way because you've got to go after the messenger because you sure as heck can't defend the message.  It's a typical leftist tactic to deviate and distract.  Your little world of glitter and unicorns is really starting to crumble.  Better scurry along to that safe space of yours while you await your new talking points from the mother ship.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

You're not going to find an iota of curiosity coming from Indy.  That would go against the very core of his viewpoint which is pretty much "regurgitate whatever MSNBC / CNN tells me to say and nothing more.  If they're not saying it, neither am I."

 

I always thought that Indy was a female.  It doesn't really matter though.

 

The fact of the matter is that the 0bama regime did in fact "wiretap" or do surveillance on the Trump campaign and/or the Trump transition team.  Unless there was a national security issue, there is no reason why a National Security Adviser should be requesting the data specifically about the new administration's transition team.

 

This was all about politics and nothing more.

---

There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.

I always thought that Indy was a female. It doesn't really matter though.


The fact of the matter is that the 0bama regime did in fact "wiretap" or do surveillance on the Trump campaign and/or the Trump transition team. Unless there was a national security issue, there is no reason why a National Security Adviser should be requesting the data specifically about the new administration's transition team.


This was all about politics and nothing more.

The republican mind in action^


Jibber just done convinced himself.


Good job buddy! Problem solved, right?

---

I always thought that Indy was a female.  It doesn't really matter though.

 

The fact of the matter is that the 0bama regime did in fact "wiretap" or do surveillance on the Trump campaign and/or the Trump transition team.  Unless there was a national security issue, there is no reason why a National Security Adviser should be requesting the data specifically about the new administration's transition team.

 

This was all about politics and nothing more.

 

Considering the fact that details keep coming out that further solidify the notion that this was a political hit job, it appears the Obama administration has once again trotted out their sacrificial lamb to take the arrows on this one.  After all, Susan Rice has already proven she's more than adept at lying in front of the cameras.  She and Loretta Lynch have served as Barry's angels in insulating him from blame.

 

Rice was requesting detailed spreadsheets of activity of all Trump operatives going back a year prior to the election.  For what purpose other than politics?  What we know about that administration is that they were willing to politicize just about any department to serve their purpose.  This was no different.

 

 

The republican mind in action^


Jibber just done convinced himself.


Good job buddy! Problem solved, right?

The liberal mind in action.

 

No substance.  Plenty of deflection.  Lots of denial.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

I'm watching foxnews right now. They are lamenting that the mainstream isn't covering this MASSIVE story about rice. They are really trying to trump this up lol. They even showed a graphic of how many seconds the networks covered the story compared to them. Of course Susan rice is denying this is political, they of course have no proof of anything and it of course has to do with Russia-Trump collusion.


You people are so easily led by the nose it's pathetic.

---

I'm watching foxnews right now. They are lamenting that the mainstream isn't covering this MASSIVE story about rice. They are really trying to trump this up lol. They even showed a graphic of how many seconds the networks covered the story compared to them. Of course Susan rice is denying this is political, they of course have no proof of anything and it of course has to do with Russia-Trump collusion.


You people are so easily led by the nose it's pathetic.

I haven't seen how Fox News is reporting this story, so maybe I'm missing your point here about being led by the nose.  Would that be the same thing as you waiting for MSNBC or CNN to pass along pearls of wisdom for you to regurgitate as original thought?

 

Denial seems to be your go to move.  Try not to suffocate yourself by keeping your head stuck in the sand.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

I haven't seen how Fox News is reporting this story, so maybe I'm missing your point here about being led by the nose. Would that be the same thing as you waiting for MSNBC or CNN to pass along pearls of wisdom for you to regurgitate as original thought?


Denial seems to be your go to move. Try not to suffocate yourself by keeping your head stuck in the sand.

I'll give you a hint. The reason the mainstream media isn't covering this story is because it isn't a mainstream story. Now go back to THE FIERY BLAZE to read all about it.


Also it's super ironic that the guy leaking this is Ezra Cohen-whatever. Flynn's 30 yr old appointee to the security council. Who mcmasters tried to out as a Russian plant. But who trump personally intervened for - a unprecedented move btw.


But no it was Susan making the political moves lol.

---

How dare the National Security Adviser look at intelligence reports! Who does she think she is! As if the Deniers on here have any idea as to the procedures involved.

 

So many man hours trying to give Trump's stupid tweet some kind, any kind, of political cover.

 

Typical diversion - look over there! Shiny object!

 

But the two Seans (Spicer and Hannity) are on the case. They'll get to the bottom of this!

---

The sun's not yellow, it's chicken.

look over there! Shiny object!

 

This sums up every day of a nutjob leftist's existence.

---

"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."

Maybe I'm alone here, but enough news on Russia's involvement in the election process. It won't change the outcome. Investigate, and see. What? Russia plays with politics? Shocker.

This bull [BLEEP] is getting old. IF there was any collusion with any American, then deal with it.

Today there was a gas attack in Syria. 70 dead...children, families. Many wounded. We have horse [BLEEP] health care, with zero improvements, repeal or replace. ISIS is still alive and well.

We have top political parties , much like a bitter divorcing couple , fighting over everything...and the kids suffer..just so one can upstage the other.

Obama did nothing with the red line. Now Syria is a total mess. Gassing? Holy Sadaam. What will we do? We are tired of war and I'm sure many didn't want to get involved in another.But we can't let some mother pass piss hole gas people. The regime did it. The Russians are on Assads side. They'll claim rebels did it.

Are we afraid of Russia? Trying to buddy up to them?


But... all I will expect are some tweets. Please prove me wrong, But so far...with all the hot air we get? The ice caps will melt much sooner.

---

Blakes Life Matters

Maybe I'm alone here, but enough news on Russia's involvement in the election process. It won't change the outcome. Investigate, and see. What? Russia plays with politics? Shocker.

This bull [BAD WORD REMOVED] is getting old. IF there was any collusion with any American, then deal with it.

Today there was a gas attack in Syria. 70 dead...children, families. Many wounded. We have horse [BAD WORD REMOVED] health care, with zero improvements, repeal or replace. ISIS is still alive and well.

We have top political parties , much like a bitter divorcing couple , fighting over everything...and the kids suffer..just so one can upstage the other.

Obama did nothing with the red line. Now Syria is a total mess. Gassing? Holy Sadaam. What will we do? We are tired of war and I'm sure many didn't want to get involved in another.But we can't let some mother pass [BAD WORD REMOVED] hole gas people. The regime did it. The Russians are on Assads side. They'll claim rebels did it.

Are we afraid of Russia? Trying to buddy up to them?


But... all I will expect are some tweets. Please prove me wrong, But so far...with all the hot air we get? The ice caps will melt much sooner.

That gas attack was Turkeys doing.

---

I'll give you a hint. The reason the mainstream media isn't covering this story is because it isn't a mainstream story. Now go back to THE FIERY BLAZE to read all about it.


Also it's super ironic that the guy leaking this is Ezra Cohen-whatever. Flynn's 30 yr old appointee to the security council. Who mcmasters tried to out as a Russian plant. But who trump personally intervened for - a unprecedented move btw.


But no it was Susan making the political moves lol.

You keep flailing away, but you really haven't done a very good job of pigeonholing me. The "FIERY BLAZE"?  Glenn Beck is a lunatic.  Hardly the place I'd go for my news.  For every bit of right wing nutty as he is, there's left wing nutty like the folks on your favorite source for info, MSNBC/CNN.  Your hint falls well short of reality, but that's pretty much par for the course when you're a lefty.  The last thing you want to deal with is reality.  It's all about some fantasy world where your gal won the election, and we're all living in this socialist utopia.  Unfortunately, that doesn't exist in the real world, so you're forced to live in the flatulent crop dusting of your messiah 2.0, Bernie "sell out" Sanders.

 

You do grasp what a leak actually is, right?  What Ezra Cohen-Watnick provided to Nunes wasn't "leaked", but I can understand why you would be confused because you need to try to make that seem like some sort of sinister act for the White House to provide information to the chairman of a committee tasked with investigating ACTUAL leaks to the media done by your messiah's administration for political purposes.  It's actually completely above board and legal, unlike the leaks done by the Obama administration to undermine Trump about contact with Russia that, as it is starting to turn out, had zero inappropriate behavior identified.  Love the spin about this being a Russian plant McMasters was "trying to out."  I guess MSNBC and CNN have provided you with the talking points needed for regurgitation, and like a loyal little mindless lemming, you're doing your duty.

 

Susan Rice has proven in the past to be more than willing to propagate a lie to protect your messiah, and to do it on every television network repeatedly.  Like you, she's a dutiful little lemming who just so happens to have been Obama's right hand gal. 

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

How dare the National Security Adviser look at intelligence reports! Who does she think she is! As if the Deniers on here have any idea as to the procedures involved.

 

So many man hours trying to give Trump's stupid tweet some kind, any kind, of political cover.

 

Typical diversion - look over there! Shiny object!

 

But the two Seans (Spicer and Hannity) are on the case. They'll get to the bottom of this!

 

Looking at "intelligence reports" and requesting that data be unmasked are two different things.  And she wasn't just looking at reports.  She was compiling data that was more or less being used as a playbook for how the Obama administration would deal with the Trump campaign.  They were monitoring a political campaign for over a year.  They weren't monitoring any other campaign.  Just Trump's from what we can tell.

 

The deniers are those folks like you who act like nothing happened here.  Someone leaked that intelligence after having the data unmasked so that names could be attached to the leaks.  You act like this didn't happen, but the NY Times and your beloved CNN/MSNBC were reporting the leaks as breathlessly as they would a Kardashian wardrobe malfunction.  Of course, the leaks didn't really provide much in the way of detail, but there was misinformation provided implying people like Flynn were doing something illegal.  Turns out not to be true, but the taint of the accusation was all that really mattered..

 

Let's talk about typical diversionary tactics, shall we??  Your gal was such a horrible, flawed candidate that you and your fellow leftys spent the entire election cycle trying to get people to pay attention to anything BUT your candidate.  Liberals mastered the art of the diversion in this election cycle.  You're doing it in this very post.  Hannity!  Spicer! 

 

It's pathetic, but fully expected because the left is beyond desperate at this point.  Their entire socialist utopia is being dismantled before your very eyes.  So, keep on flailing away.

---

Never argue with idiots. They drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.

Looking at "intelligence reports" and requesting that data be unmasked are two different things. And she wasn't just looking at reports. She was compiling data that was more or less being used as a playbook for how the Obama administration would deal with the Trump campaign. They were monitoring a political campaign for over a year. They weren't monitoring any other campaign. Just Trump's from what we can tell.


The deniers are those folks like you who act like nothing happened here. Someone leaked that intelligence after having the data unmasked so that names could be attached to the leaks. You act like this didn't happen, but the NY Times and your beloved CNN/MSNBC were reporting the leaks as breathlessly as they would a Kardashian wardrobe malfunction. Of course, the leaks didn't really provide much in the way of detail, but there was misinformation provided implying people like Flynn were doing something illegal. Turns out not to be true, but the taint of the accusation was all that really mattered..


Let's talk about typical diversionary tactics, shall we?? Your gal was such a horrible, flawed candidate that you and your fellow leftys spent the entire election cycle trying to get people to pay attention to anything BUT your candidate. Liberals mastered the art of the diversion in this election cycle. You're doing it in this very post. Hannity! Spicer!


It's pathetic, but fully expected because the left is beyond desperate at this point. Their entire socialist utopia is being dismantled before your very eyes. So, keep on flailing away.

And right on cue, Drifter's posting the news of the weird. If that doesn't tell you something...

---