Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

M. Lewis holds him in high regards. Not that it matters coming from such a mediocre talent, but it seemed as though that was the only coach Lewis hated to see go after Mularky's dismissal. 

Quote:You don't like cartoon women? Get with the times man.

 

Have you seen Jessica Rabbit lately? She's really let herself go.....

 

London get ready in a couple years your getting a nfl team from Jacksonville.

I don't understand how that person can stand up.

Idk I'll be honest here, I think Jessica Rabbit looks even better with a lil bit of meat on her bones

I do believe that Gus did not take time on his first OC to put into place I think Fisch was not the right OC for us at times it look like Fisch was over his head.  Gus with our new OC and OL coach will work well with our staff that is in place. We have no place to go but up from here. 

Quote:I do believe that Gus did not take time on his first OC to put into place I think Fisch was not the right OC for us at times it look like Fisch was over his head.  Gus with our new OC and OL coach will work well with our staff that is in place. We have no place to go but up from here. 

 

thats my thing, for marrone to work under greg olson is pretty impressive because marrone himself is a pretty well proven offensive mind.

 

olson alone may not be a home run hire, but the entire staff as a whole sounds like it has a lot of promise.

Quote:thats my thing, for marrone to work under greg olson is pretty impressive because marrone himself is a pretty well proven offensive mind.

 

olson alone may not be a home run hire, but the entire staff as a whole sounds like it has a lot of promise.

It seems we may copy what the Cowboys have done with Linehan and Callahan. It could be interesting to see who finishes next season as the actual play caller for the Jaguars.

Quote:London get ready in a couple years your getting a nfl team from Jacksonville.

 

Wow I have never seen wolfy so jaded and cynical. He is usually the most upbeat of us around here.

Why Jags why.  The guy made the best show on turf terrible.   He had a ton of weapons in tampa too.   We hire the guy who had a worse Offense then us.   Like that was possible.  Expecting different results?   Insanity anyone?

 

And there is no reason to pack to london we have yet to compete there.

Quote:Why Jags why.  The guy made the best show on turf terrible.   He had a ton of weapons in tampa too.   We hire the guy who had a worse Offense then us.   Like that was possible.  Expecting different results?   Insanity anyone?

 

And there is no reason to pack to london we have yet to compete there.

 

In 2011, Koetter and the Jags offense was ranked 32nd overall. The Falcons hired him in 2012 and their offense hit 8th overall the following year. 

Quote:In 2011, Koetter and the Jags offense was ranked 32nd overall. The Falcons hired him in 2012 and their offense hit 8th overall the following year. 

 

Great. So all we need to do is get an elite QB with 2 elite WRs and an elite TE and we might be able to manage an above-average offense. 

Quote:Great. So all we need to do is get an elite QB with 2 elite WRs and an elite TE and we might be able to manage an above-average offense. 

 

What's your point? Is it Koetter's fault when they don't succeed and the players' performances when they do? Likewise, will it be Olson's fault if they don't do well here or will it be the players'?

Quote:What's your point? Is it Koetter's fault when they don't succeed and the players' performances when they do? 

 

I'm sorry, are you under the impression that the people who don't like this hire think players don't matter at all?

Quote:I'm sorry, are you under the impression that the people who don't like this hire think players don't matter at all?

 

I'm under the impression that I replied to a comment where Teal Time Radio implied that they shouldn't expect different results because he had an offense ranked worse than our's was.

 

You came in and emphasized the importance of good players over the quality of coach so thanks for proving my point. 

Quote:I'm under the impression that I replied to a comment where Teal Time Radio implied that they shouldn't expect different results because he had an offense ranked worse than our's was.

 

You came in and emphasized the importance of good players over the quality of coach so thanks for proving my point. 

 

... are you trying to argue that the overwhelming talent on this offense is going to carry Olson to a serviceable offense? Because that's a hard sell. Koetter took the 11th best offense (coached by Mike Mularkey) and turned them into the 12th best offense (By DVOA). I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. 

Yes, it is possible to have a decent offense with a bad offensive coordinator. That doesn't mean that you should hire a bad offensive coordinator. 

Quote:... are you trying to argue that the overwhelming talent on this offense is going to carry Olson to a serviceable offense? Because that's a hard sell. Koetter took the 11th best offense (coached by Mike Mularkey) and turned them into the 12th best offense (By DVOA). I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. 

 

He said we shouldn't expect different results because of the Olson's ranking. I made a comment about how hiring someone, with the worst offense, improved upon the offense he was hired to run. In other words, it was a weak argument with no real substance. 

 

YOU used the quality of players to imply that Koetter was successful only because of the quality of players he coached. Therefore, it's reasonable to assume that you agreed with him or didn't understand my point all along. 

Quote:Yes, it is possible to have a decent offense with a bad offensive coordinator. That doesn't mean that you should hire a bad offensive coordinator. 

 

I didn't say anyone should hire a bad coordinator. I only pointed out an example that proves his opinion incorrect on the conditions that he used to form it.

Quote:He said we shouldn't expect different results because of the Olson's ranking. I made a comment about how hiring someone, with the worst offense, improved upon the offense he was hired to run. In other words, it was a weak argument with no real substance. 

 

YOU used the quality of players to imply that Koetter was successful only because of the quality of players he coached. Therefore, it's reasonable to assume that you agreed with him or didn't understand my point all along. 

 

But Koetter didn't improve the Falcons' offense, so...?