05-02-2014, 02:25 PM
05-02-2014, 03:34 PM
Quote:What do they trade?
Intelligents. Duh.
05-02-2014, 03:37 PM
Quote:Let me save you some time. It's pointless to racism because people will just play dumb.
We congratulate you on being a terrific example.
05-02-2014, 04:51 PM
Quote:We congratulate you on being a terrific example.I've never been the one to make a comment to insult someone and not outline my reason. I hated when my women do this, but I get over it because I know their just expressing their emotions that happen to be devoid of reason. So come now sir, let us reason. How so?
05-02-2014, 06:10 PM
Quote:And here I got all excited to see Manziel smoke Bridgewater in the 100-yard dash.I thought that originally too lol
05-02-2014, 06:49 PM
Quote:I've never been the one to make a comment to insult someone and not outline my reason. I hated when my women do this, but I get over it because I know their just expressing their emotions that happen to be devoid of reason. So come now sir, let us reason. How so?
That's rich, bringing a sexist remark to a discussion on bias. Credibility... lost. That, is why you fail. I've yet to see anything substantive you've brought to the table. You're just baiting, you know it, and you yourself think everyone else is too stupid to see it. It's why you've chosen to highjack a Manziel/Bridgewater discussion into something it's not.
Like I've said before (if you'd care to actually talk about the thread topic,) it's my opinion that the only racial bias here is that perhaps many weren't critical enough of him in the beginning because they were afraid to be accused of racial bias if they did.
05-02-2014, 08:07 PM
Quote:That's rich, bringing a sexist remark to a discussion on bias. Credibility... lost. That, is why you fail. I've yet to see anything substantive you've brought to the table. You're just baiting, you know it, and you yourself think everyone else is too stupid to see it. It's why you've chosen to highjack a Manziel/Bridgewater discussion into something it's not.
Like I've said before (if you'd care to actually talk about the thread topic,) it's my opinion that the only racial bias here is that perhaps many weren't critical enough of him in the beginning because they were afraid to be accused of racial bias if they did.
I think you need to read my posts again. The guy didn't understand why the sudden change and I explained to him and everyone else the race dynamic in this country. It was simply my explaination and it made since to others judging from the private feedback I've recieved.
As far as my "so called" sexist remark, I was just illistrating what my women and my children do when they are upset, but don't know how to express themselves or they're just coming from a place of raw emotion. Children name call because, well, they're children. They haven't learned to control their emotions yet. I give them a pass. Women are for the most part are more emotional than men. If you've ever had a mother, aunt, wife or a girlfriend you've no doubt observed this. There nothing wrong with stating this obvious truth. If I said men are stronger than women would this be sexist. We are chemical predisposed to have certain behavioral traits. Think of it as two different, but equal halfs making a whole. I don't see emotion as a negative when dealling with women. I'm sorry you do because your missing out on another level of understanding your other half. I wouldn't trust a women on the same emotional level as a man. Men tend to be more logical and reason oriented when it comes to male/female relationship dynamics, but trust me, my women are more masculine then a lot of men in the workplace or when they need to handle business. But they never approach me like a man and I never approach them like a female. If I did, they'd loose all respect for me.
I guess what I'm saying is if you come at someone with no argument and start name calling, you have to be prepared to be seen as kinda feminine. I wouldn't trust a man's resolve or follow a man into battle with this mentality. And I don't too many women would follow such a man to bed either.
05-02-2014, 08:59 PM
That was quite intelligent and insightful. I think you've pretty much taught us all something here.
05-02-2014, 09:04 PM
Before we continue, I would just like to say that popcorn is unhealthy and should be eaten in moderation.
05-02-2014, 09:05 PM
Quote:That was quite intelligent and insightful. I think you've pretty much taught us all something here.
Feel free to lock/move this thread to the sideline at any time now.
05-02-2014, 09:13 PM
Quote:Feel free to lock/move this thread to the sideline at any time now.exactly, he should right a book maybe someone will read it. Not me but maybe someone will
05-02-2014, 11:13 PM
Quote:I guess what I'm saying is if you come at someone with no argument and start name calling, you have to be prepared to be seen as kinda feminine.What is it with you guys owing me new keyboards tonight? My wife doesn't call people names. My wife is the most violent person I know, and I mean that in the kindest possible way.
05-03-2014, 01:04 AM
Quote:Welcome to the forum mate.I hope you're joking on this comment it's 2014....
For real though you sound smarter than 90% of the people here just from this post. Glad you joined. I hope youre not a Celtic fan.
05-03-2014, 08:51 PM
In the case of Bridgewater I personally do not feel this is the case. Although I do feel he has been blasted due to his not so stellar pre-draft examinations; he has taken much heat. I do feel it is not warranted but there is no reason for me to believe this is a race thing. Previous players I have had this feeling but in this instance I don't get that feeling. He has a few concerns as very few prospects don't have them. Sometimes I see this stuff right off the bat but in this instance I see no reason too.