03-09-2014, 03:20 AM
03-09-2014, 03:24 AM
Watkins. If we are going to be stuck with Henne for a year while the second-round kid learns, let's at least give him better playmakers on the outside.
(I can't help but notice that Bortles, who would probably be my pick in that scenario, isn't an option...)
(I can't help but notice that Bortles, who would probably be my pick in that scenario, isn't an option...)
03-09-2014, 03:27 AM
Quote:Watkins. If we are going to be stuck with Henne for a year while the second-round kid learns, let's at least give him better playmakers on the outside.Its possible, I just think it is more likely we take Watkins or Mack, I could be wrong though. The draft is too far away.
(I can't help but notice that Bortles, who would probably be my pick in that scenario, isn't an option...)
03-09-2014, 03:48 AM
Who does Sammy compare to?
03-09-2014, 03:50 AM
Quote:Who does Sammy compare to?I say like Cordarrelle Patterson with better hands.
03-09-2014, 03:56 AM
Quote:Who does Sammy compare to?Imagine, with me, a world in which Troy Williamson could catch or break a tackle. That Troy Williamson, alternate-reality Troy Williamson who can catch and break a tackle, looks a lot like Sammy Watkins.
03-09-2014, 07:00 AM
Quote:I say like Cordarrelle Patterson with better hands.Watkins may be over-rated. Great receivers never have to think about catching the forward pass. I see a lot of balls Sammy has to cradle in. I can't imagine the horror of having a real NFL QB put the ball on his body.
As for Mack, the Bills should have to pick him. I was not impressed with his Combine appearance. He just seems to be a bandit-type linebacker that scrapes the line and infiltrates the backfield once in a while. Rob Johnson had a big game, too.
03-09-2014, 10:16 AM
Pass rusher over receiver any day of the week...And twice on Sunday.
03-09-2014, 10:33 AM
These are actually the two names I am happy with, either one fine by me.
No QB is worth the #3 selection.
No QB is worth the #3 selection.
03-09-2014, 10:37 AM
Mack, no question. Premier talent at a position of need. Would bea stud from day 1.
03-09-2014, 10:43 AM
Mack, we could a very good pass catcher in the 2nd
03-09-2014, 11:00 AM
Manziel.
03-09-2014, 11:17 AM
Mack. If we get one of Micheal Johnson/ Everson Griffin to start at LEO, combine that with Mack at SAM and the defense could be very respectable. We have too many other pressing needs to take a WR that high.
Saw him at a bar with some other people on the UB team last night. Didnt really talk football but hes a pretty cool guy. Hes a little more reserved than I would have thought.
Saw him at a bar with some other people on the UB team last night. Didnt really talk football but hes a pretty cool guy. Hes a little more reserved than I would have thought.
03-09-2014, 12:24 PM
Quote:I say like Cordarrelle Patterson with better hands.
I think his style is similar but isnt CP a big guy?
03-09-2014, 12:25 PM
Quote:I think his style is similar but isnt CP a big guy?Yeah CP is a lot bigger, and a lot more explosive too honestly. Sammy is a better overall WR (and is plenty explosive himself), but Patterson once he gets the balls in his hands is the most scary thing going in the NFL right now.
03-09-2014, 12:26 PM
I would take Mack. Equal talents but WR is so deep this year.
03-09-2014, 12:28 PM
Quote:I think his style is similar but isnt CP a big guy?yeah he is a little
bigger but I think Sammy is just as explosive when he gets the ball ib his hand and both really fast
03-09-2014, 12:48 PM
Mack would take full advantage of Red Bryant causing havoc up front. I don't know if Watkins would reach his full potential with Henne or one of the later projected quarter backs throwing him the ball. But who honestly knows how anyone will pan out?
03-09-2014, 01:00 PM
Manziel
03-09-2014, 01:03 PM
Quote:ManzielThats who I want also but I dont know if Caldwell wants him.