If Teddy and Clowney go 1 and 2, who would you rather have at 3?

 

 

---

Watkins. If we are going to be stuck with Henne for a year while the second-round kid learns, let's at least give him better playmakers on the outside.

 

(I can't help but notice that Bortles, who would probably be my pick in that scenario, isn't an option...)

---

Watkins. If we are going to be stuck with Henne for a year while the second-round kid learns, let's at least give him better playmakers on the outside.

 

(I can't help but notice that Bortles, who would probably be my pick in that scenario, isn't an option...)

Its possible, I just think it is more likely we take Watkins or Mack, I could be wrong though.  The draft is too far away.

---

Who does Sammy compare to?

---

Who does Sammy compare to?

I say like Cordarrelle Patterson with better hands.

---

Who does Sammy compare to?

Imagine, with me, a world in which Troy Williamson could catch or break a tackle. That Troy Williamson, alternate-reality Troy Williamson who can catch and break a tackle, looks a lot like Sammy Watkins.

---

I say like Cordarrelle Patterson with better hands.

Watkins may be over-rated. Great receivers never have to think about catching the forward pass. I see a lot of balls Sammy has to cradle in. I can't imagine the horror of having a real NFL QB put the ball on his body.

 

As for Mack, the Bills should have to pick him. I was not impressed with his Combine appearance. He just seems to be a bandit-type linebacker that scrapes the line and infiltrates the backfield once in a while. Rob Johnson had a big game, too.

---

First they ignore you, then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win. - Mahatma Gandhi

 

http://s6.postimg.org/vyr2ycdfz/Teddy_Br...cked_4.gif

Pass rusher over receiver any day of the week...And twice on Sunday.

---

Making up

Evidence

Depending on

Information

Available

These are actually the two names I am happy with, either one fine by me.

 

No QB is worth the #3 selection.

---

Mack, no question. Premier talent at a position of need. Would bea stud from day 1.

---

"Let us not become conceited, provoking and envying each other." Galatians 5:26

2015 NFL Draft - Analyzing Targets www.jungle.jaguars.com/index.php?/topic/7892-2015-nfl-draft-analyzing-targets/

Mack, we could a very good pass catcher in the 2nd

---

Manziel.

---

 

<div>
I rolled on the floor laughing, With all those missed reads in the pocket Manziel had to improvise. If he had just stuck to the play book (or just be Teddy Bridgewater) A&M would have been in the National Title hunt late


 

</div>
Trolls gonna troll. 

Mack. If we get one of Micheal Johnson/ Everson Griffin to start at LEO, combine that with Mack at SAM and the defense could be very respectable. We have too many other pressing needs to take a WR that high.

 

Saw him at a bar with some other people on the UB team last night. Didnt really talk football but hes a pretty cool guy. Hes a little more reserved than I would have thought.

---

I say like Cordarrelle Patterson with better hands.

I think his style is similar but isnt CP a big guy?

---

I think his style is similar but isnt CP a big guy?

Yeah CP is a lot bigger, and a lot more explosive too honestly. Sammy is a better overall WR (and is plenty explosive himself), but Patterson once he gets the balls in his hands is the most scary thing going in the NFL right now. 

---

I would take Mack. Equal talents but WR is so deep this year. 

---

I think his style is similar but isnt CP a big guy?

yeah he is a little

bigger but I think Sammy is just as explosive when he gets the ball ib his hand and both really fast

---

Mack would take full advantage of Red Bryant causing havoc up front. I don't know if Watkins would reach his full potential with Henne or one of the later projected quarter backs throwing him the ball. But who honestly knows how anyone will pan out?

---

Manziel

---

Manziel

Thats who I want also but I dont know if Caldwell wants him.

---