Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Remember how excited for the future we all were 4 years ago?  

Quote:Remember how excited for the future we all were 4 years ago?

 

We all knew it was going to be a three-year rebuild, but yes, it was an exciting time. I don't think anyone knew Gus Bradley was a bad coach at the time.

More interesting all time loss stats...   Gus would have to be our coach for 9 years with his 3.5 wins per season record (4 Wins for Math)  to set the all time lose record.

 

Dan Reeves who is 190-165-2 for his career when asked to comment said Gus could do it in 7 based on what he has seen on the field.

If it was possible:

1. Would you rather have known 4 years ago that we would still be this bad.

or

2. Be excited and have it all come crashing down on you.

 

I think I'd still take the second  :confused:

Lol!!!!!

Quote:If it was possible:

1. Would you rather have known 4 years ago that we would still be this bad.

or

2. Be excited and have it all come crashing down on you.

 

I think I'd still take the second 

 

I think everybody would rather be excited than know we still can't win more than five games four years later.

The more and more Gus digs his whole deeper, the more embarrassed I am to be a fan.

Quote:The more and more Gus digs his hole deeper, the more embarrassed I am to be a fan.

 

He is not digging the hole deeper. We improved a lot on defense. Greg Olson was fired. Yes, we are losing, but anyone who watches the games knows better than to say this team is getting worse.

Quote:He is not digging the hole deeper. We improved a lot on defense. Greg Olson was fired. Yes, we are losing, but anyone who watches the games knows better than to say this team is getting worse.

 

Spray Febreze on it all you want, still looks and smells like [BLEEP] to me 

 

Quote:The more and more Gus digs his whole deeper, the more embarrassed I am to be a fan.

 

The Jags need that "w" more then that hole does.

Quote:The Jags need that "w" more then that hole does.

 

Good one.

The only reason I keep coming back to this thread is to see if anybody can explain why 14 wins in four years is worse than no wins in 41 years.

Quote:The only reason I keep coming back to this thread is to see if anybody can explain why 14 wins in four years is worse than no wins in 41 years.

 

 Bill Belichick has a plethora of currency.

Quote:The only reason I keep coming back to this thread is to see if anybody can explain why 14 wins in four years is worse than no wins in 41 years.

Well, you have me on ignore, but here goes. The timeline for Belichick doesn't start right now. Included into the OP's stat are his previous wins and losses. All of that said, that stat sounds way more ridiculous than it actually is. That is because a win or loss for Belichick influences the winning percentage much less than either would for Bradley. This is due to the total number of games each has coached.


Taken to the extreme for example's sake, a coach with a record of 1-4 would only need 8 wins to eclipse Belichick's winning percentage.

Quote: Bill Belichick has a plethora of currency.

 

How many years has he been a head coach?

 

Far less than 41, I know that much.

Quote:How many years has he been a head coach?

 

Far less than 41, I know that much.

 

 22

Quote: 22

 

That proves my point. Belicheat would have no wins as a HC if he went 0-16 every year.

 

I think the OP was just making up crap to hate on Bradley. It is a common theme here.

Can someone whobhasnt been ignored please teach MJF simple mathematics or logic in general that backup the original post. Thank you.

Quote:The Jags need that "w" more then that hole does.

Stupid auto correct

Quote:Stupid auto correct

 

Auto-error.