Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Quote:It's beyond mental illness for some to believe the party of McCarthy was somehow "aided" by Russia in an election.


Let that sink in, if there's a brain for that to sink into...

Trump isn't a Republican.

Quote:Trump isn't a Republican.

 

It must be hard to keep all the different stories straight.

 

None of them add up.

 

“The 1980s are now calling to ask for their foreign policy back because…the Cold War’s been over for 20 years.”- Barack Hussein 0bama


 

I guess it's all "back on" now that his power is gone, and voters soundly rejected his ideology.  No wait, it wasn't a fair vote... Russians to blame!


 

If you weren't busy polishing his brass, you'd realize the chump in charge is being played like the fool he is.  He's taking his shots at everyone on his way out the door like a angry child after being rejected.  Putin [BLEEP] slapped him after his amateurish move with the diplomats.

 

Again, the only "relationship" between Putin and Trump that 0bama didn't have is mutual respect.  Unfortunately through his bumbling that fact has been underscored during these final days of an utter disaster of a (lower case p) presidency.

Quote:Trump isn't a Republican.

 

And you finally move close to the truth, that Trump is the enemy of both parties but could perhaps be the true friend of America.

Quote:Should the 17 intelligence agencies also be telling it like this is?

 

Name them!

Quote:Name them!

Athos

Porthos

Aramis

D'artagnon

Happy

Grumpy

Doc

Bashful

Sneezy

Sleepy

Dopey

Matthew

Mark

Luke

John

Anthony Weiner's babysitter

And

Hillary's [BLEEP] James "see no evil" Comey

Quote:Name them!

Seems it's all in here

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications/JAR_16-20296A_GRIZZLY%20STEPPE-2016-1229.pdf'>https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications/JAR_16-20296A_GRIZZLY%20STEPPE-2016-1229.pdf</a>

Quote:They are literally ignoring the legitimate concerns some of the Republicans are expressing when it comes to how Russia has handled itself and its diplomatic relationship with the U.S.



Basically to them it's let's forget about Crimea, forgot about their involvement in Syria. They are turning a blind eye to it.

I thought there was some sort of reset?

There's documented proof that the democrat party under potential nominee Ted Kennedy (who killed someone) actively solicitited Soviet actors for direct interference in the 1984 presidential election. Among the ideas discussed was a pro soviet propaganda campaign to oppose the pro American Reagan.


The dems history with soviet Russia borders on treason. The idea that they are feigning such outrage over ALLEGED leaking of documents everyone knows to be true is laughable.


Democrat party operatives hacked Sarah Palin's email in 2008. Where was the outrage?

Oh and to everyone who thinks the top isn't taking it seriously, they took it seriously enough not to get hacked.

Quote:Seems it's all in here

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications/JAR_16-20296A_GRIZZLY%20STEPPE-2016-1229.pdf'>https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications/JAR_16-20296A_GRIZZLY%20STEPPE-2016-1229.pdf</a>

 

Did you even read that report?  It's mostly a description of common attack techniques and "IT safe practices" babble.  

 

Also, the only thing even close to tying Russia to any of it is the small snippet of PHP code from commonly found wordpress malware that has been freely downloadable by the public for years.  It's pretty much outdated malware.  The original malware was apparently authored in the Ukraine which is next to Russia.  Though the link that I provide is a blog, it's far more detailed and is from a reputable source.

 

Finally, the report doesn't show that "the election was hacked" or that the DNC was specifically targeted.  From the report you linked

Quote: 

In summer 2015, an APT29 spearphishing campaign directed emails containing a malicious link to over 1,000 recipients, including multiple U.S. Government victims. APT29 used legitimate domains, to include domains associated with U.S. organizations and educational institutions, to host malware and send spearphishing emails. 

Quote:Did you even read that report?  It's mostly a description of common attack techniques and "IT safe practices" babble.  

 

Also, the only thing even close to tying Russia to any of it is the small snippet of PHP code from <a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2016/12/russia-malware-ip-hack/'>commonly found wordpress malware that has been freely downloadable by the public for years</a>.  It's pretty much outdated malware.  The original malware was apparently authored in the Ukraine which is next to Russia.  Though the link that I provide is a blog, it's far more detailed and is from a reputable source.

 

Finally, the report doesn't show that "the election was hacked" or that the DNC was specifically targeted.  From the report you linked

Blogs are more reputable than an actual FBI report? Ok whatever. Deny the facts all you want. It doesn't change them from being facts though.

Quote:Blogs are more reputable than an actual FBI report? Ok whatever. Deny the facts all you want. It doesn't change them from being facts though.

 

Considering the blog is written by the founder and CEO of one of the cyber-security firms cited in numerous reports, I would certainly call it reputable.  Of course it is very detailed and provides hard facts that conclude that there is no way to determine who initiated the attacks.  Since you don't seem to be interested in finding out the truth on your own I'll leave you with this conclusion by somebody with far more knowledge of the facts.

 

Quote: 

 


Overall Conclusion
<p style="color:rgb(45,45,45);font-family:'Gotham SSm A', 'Gotham SSm B', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">The IP addresses that DHS provided may have been used for an attack by a state actor like Russia. But they don’t appear to provide any association with Russia
. They are probably used by a wide range of other malicious actors, especially the 15% of IP addresses that are Tor exit nodes.

<p style="color:rgb(45,45,45);font-family:'Gotham SSm A', 'Gotham SSm B', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">The malware sample is old, widely used and appears to be Ukrainian. It has no apparent relationship with Russian intelligence
and it would be an indicator of compromise for any website.

<p style="color:rgb(45,45,45);font-family:'Gotham SSm A', 'Gotham SSm B', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">You can find a public repository containing the data used in this report on github.

<p style="color:rgb(45,45,45);font-family:'Gotham SSm A', 'Gotham SSm B', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">As always I welcome your comments. Please note that I will delete any political comments. Our goal in this report is to merely analyze the data DHS provided and share our findings.


<p style="color:rgb(45,45,45);font-family:'Gotham SSm A', 'Gotham SSm B', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;">Mark Maunder – Wordfence Founder/CEO

 

 

Did you even read the report that you linked?  What facts from the report indicate that Russia specifically targeted the election?

Quote:Seems it's all in here

<a class="bbc_url" href='https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications/JAR_16-20296A_GRIZZLY%20STEPPE-2016-1229.pdf'>https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications/JAR_16-20296A_GRIZZLY%20STEPPE-2016-1229.pdf</a>

 

I saw no names of the supposed 17 agencies.

Quote:Considering the blog is written by the founder and CEO of one of the cyber-security firms cited in numerous reports, I would certainly call it reputable. Of course it is very detailed and provides hard facts that conclude that there is no way to determine who initiated the attacks. Since you don't seem to be interested in finding out the truth on your own I'll leave you with this conclusion by somebody with far more knowledge of the facts.



Did you even read the report that you linked? What facts from the report indicate that Russia specifically targeted the election?

I am wondering why you believe that any of the government agencies would feel they have any requirement to lay out every detail or info to average citizens.


It's quite obvious that US intelligence has evidence of an attack. Even the Senate and House believe it.


So bury your head in the sand! Don't care anymore!

I don't get it. Perhaps I overslept, but when did Republicans/Conservatives/Populists become such apologists for the Soviets?

 

Somewhere Ronald Reagan is throwing up.

Quote:I am wondering why you believe that any of the government agencies would feel they have any requirement to lay out every detail or info to average citizens.


It's quite obvious that US intelligence has evidence of an attack. Even the Senate and House believe it.


So bury your head in the sand! Don't care anymore!

 

I'm not saying that there was no attack.  I'm saying that there is no evidence linking the attackers to the Russian government.  Keep lapping up all of the misinformation being reported.

Quote:I don't get it. Perhaps I overslept, but when did Republicans/Conservatives/Populists become such apologists for the Soviets?

 

Somewhere Ronald Reagan is throwing up.

 

Soviets?


 

1985 is calling you back.

Quote:I don't get it. Perhaps I overslept, but when did Republicans/Conservatives/Populists become such apologists for the Soviets?

 

Somewhere Ronald Reagan is throwing up.

Nobody is.  The Soviets are long gone.  However, there has been no evidence reported anywhere that the Russian government is behind the attacks.

Quote:Nobody is. The Soviets are long gone. However, there has been no evidence reported anywhere that the Russian government is behind the attacks.

You're not cleared for that information.

Quote:You're not cleared for that information.

 

Actually my statement is a FACT.