Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

(09-17-2017, 10:50 AM)WingerDinger Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-17-2017, 10:49 AM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ]I wasn't picturing it being intentional.   He gave himself 3 points.   I was just trying to imagine the possibilities.  I picture him in dirty tighty whities, no shirt, slouching on the couch and an empty bottle on the floor.  Bad PI call on jags gives the tacs winning field goal and winger kicking the empty bottle.

You spyin on me boy?

You open the blinds for us all to see with your posts.  I for one appreciate the warped sense of humor.  Don't change.

[

Friendly reminder.. the word 'tacks' is not deserving of capitalization.

Most pundits I saw have the Jags losing this game (nice to know some things haven't changed). I think our defense is better than Oakland's on all three levels, but somehow the offense that couldn't run against them is projected to "get right" today. Not sure what to believe after last week, but we always play the tacks tough and I am not intimidated by their defense. Unless Blake implodes with a game plan designed to control the clock and manage the game, I see 2 and 0 in our sights.

(09-17-2017, 11:01 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ][

(09-17-2017, 10:26 AM)Thaddeus43 Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-17-2017, 10:22 AM)hb1148 Wrote: [ -> ]Jags 28, flaming thumbtacks: 13.

Jags O is incapable of putting up 28 points.

Gonna take another record setting day by your D to get close ... and you won't get another fluke game like that for 10 years.

Jags O put up 22 (probably should have been 26 but for poor kicking) against a lot better defense than yours.

I think that offense is much more capable of putting up points than most. I think that they are closer to the offense of 2015 than 2016. I also think that they will be overshadowed by the defense all year, which will keep them from being under the microscope, keeping a lot of pressure off of Blake, which is a good thing. I think that Tennessee is a tough team, but hopefully the home crowd can push us over the edge. I'll take the Jags 24 Titans 13. I think Blake goes 23-33, for 225 yards, 2 TD 0 INT's. I also think Fournette carries the load again with 25 carries for 110 yards and 1 TD. Meyers goes 1-1 on FG, and perfect on XP's. Defense plays well again, and the Jags WIN 24-13.

(09-17-2017, 11:05 AM)Kotite Wrote: [ -> ]Friendly reminder..  the word 'tacks' is not deserving of capitalization.

Most pundits I saw have the Jags losing this game (nice to know some things haven't changed). I think our defense is better than Oakland's on all three levels, but somehow the offense that couldn't run against them is projected to "get right" today. Not sure what to believe after last week, but we always play the tacks tough and I am not intimidated by their defense. Unless Blake implodes with a game plan designed to control the clock and manage the game, I see 2 and 0 in our sights.

Agree to disagree on the first line.

I want change when it comes to the media's respect for our offense, but that topic is for another day.

We do have a better defense than Oakland against the pass, but I am not sure about the run because they stopped a much better RB.

(09-17-2017, 10:11 AM)Jags Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-17-2017, 09:55 AM)mvannostran Wrote: [ -> ]Yeah, but that timeline doesn't have to be today!

I guess I'm still wondering if last week was a fluke or not.   Earn my trust Jaguars!

Same

Sent from my Z981 using Tapatalk

When will this become a live thread?

When the DJ starts playing some music, it'll liven up.

---

And when the drinks start flowing.

---

No doubt it'll lead to sacks

(09-17-2017, 11:01 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ][

Amen!

Alright, let's get a roll call:

Sec 228 in the house.

Where y'all at???

Go JAGS!

(09-17-2017, 11:31 AM)CAPTAIN Wrote: [ -> ]Alright, let's get a roll call:

Sec 228 in the house.

Where y'all at???

Go JAGS!

I'm somewhere near or in Sacksonville.   My GPS is acting screwy right now. Keeps recalculating. JDub wouldn't tell me where it is exactly.

(09-17-2017, 10:26 AM)Thaddeus43 Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-17-2017, 10:22 AM)hb1148 Wrote: [ -> ]Jags 28, flaming thumbtacks: 13.

Jags O is incapable of putting up 28 points.

Gonna take another record setting day by your D to get close ... and you won't get another fluke game like that for 10 years.

Same Jags O that dropped 31 on the tacks 9 months ago?

(09-17-2017, 11:31 AM)CAPTAIN Wrote: [ -> ]Alright, let's get a roll call:

Sec 228 in the house.

Where y'all at???

Go JAGS!

At home with a feline cheerleader.

GO JAGS

(09-17-2017, 11:36 AM)NCJag Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-17-2017, 10:26 AM)Thaddeus43 Wrote: [ -> ]Jags O is incapable of putting up 28 points.

Gonna take another record setting day by your D to get close ... and you won't get another fluke game like that for 10 years.

Same Jags O that dropped 31 on the tacks 9 months ago?

That didn't count, the titans had nothing to play for and just couldn't get up for the game.

Sheldon Day inactive? That's a surprise to me. Is he nicked up?

(09-17-2017, 11:36 AM)NCJag Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-17-2017, 10:26 AM)Thaddeus43 Wrote: [ -> ]Jags O is incapable of putting up 28 points.

Gonna take another record setting day by your D to get close ... and you won't get another fluke game like that for 10 years.

Same Jags O that dropped 31 on the tacks 9 months ago?

This is not the same Jaguars offense though. But that game certainly proved Blake Bortles can throw the ball when he needs to.

(09-17-2017, 11:40 AM)SeldomRite Wrote: [ -> ]

(09-17-2017, 11:36 AM)NCJag Wrote: [ -> ]Same Jags O that dropped 31 on the tacks 9 months ago?

That didn't count, the titans had nothing to play for and just couldn't get up for the game.

Nice sarcasm font!

(09-17-2017, 11:41 AM)newporttom Wrote: [ -> ]Sheldon Day inactive? That's a surprise to me.  Is he nicked up?

He could just be a healthy scratch. Jalen Ramsey apparently is the only player who has been listed on the injury report all week.