Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Quote:Of all the people I've argued with or have seen arguing with others on various online platforms, I can't believe the amount of people who will jump down someones throat the second they claim the voting is rigged. It's shocking. 

Of all the people I've argued with or have seen arguing with other on various online platforms, I can't believe the amount of people who will jump down someones throat the second they claim that voter suppression is happening. It's shocking. 

Quote:Why are people dissing Infowars on here? Despite some rather obvious bias, it's one of the most incredibly accurate news sites in the world.

He's right once in a great while. I mean, even the National Enquirer finds a dress now and then, but that doesn't make them an accurate or credible news organization.

 

Quote:It's only the people who are benefiting from these "glitches" that never seem to have a problem with them...

Quote:Of all the people I've argued with or have seen arguing with other on various online platforms, I can't believe the amount of people who will jump down someones throat the second they claim that voter suppression is happening. It's shocking. 

 

?

Quote:He's right once in a great while. I mean, even the National Enquirer finds a dress now and then, but that doesn't make them an accurate or credible news organization.

 

A dress...John Edwards baby momma...Gary Hart's Monkey Business...Jesse Jacksons baby momma...



They've got a couple things right.

Quote:?

Sometimes it appears that the same people that scream from the high heavens about what could easily amount to a machine glitch (really all voting should be done by paper mail in ballot IMO) or a bracelet hitting the screen and changing a selection being voter fraud are usually the same people that pretend there is not a concentrated effort to suppress votes to begin with. 

Quote:Sometimes it appears that the same people that scream from the high heavens about what could easily amount to a machine glitch (really all voting should be done by paper mail in ballot IMO) or a bracelet hitting the screen and changing a selection being voter fraud are usually the same people that pretend there is not a concentrated effort to suppress votes to begin with. 

 

I definitely agree that they should all be done on paper, especially being as that there is controversy during every election period. It's obviously an important issue.

Quote:Do you even listen to what this guy says? He's openly talked about targeting Americans based on their religion, suppressing the freedom of the press, violating the separation of powers, waterboarding.. the rules don't seem to apply to him and his legions of followers are clueless about the documents our nation was founded on. How would they even know if they were just blindly following a fascist bully?

 

 

Wow! You're stretching everything here way out of proportion. This is so not true. I'll address each point...


 

1. He's never talked about targeting religions. You'll have to explain this one in far more detail.
   
   
2. He wants the press to be honest and has talked against the current situation where they say whatever the establishment wants them to say.
   
   
3. Trump looks to abide by the Constitution and in no way has ever talked against the separation of church and state.
   
   
4. Waterboarding is a Hillary specialty. She's probably personally authorized it to be used.
   
   
5. The rules apply to Trump, but clearly they do not apply to Hillary whatsoever.
   
   
6. Trump has been a staple figure in America for a few decades, It's not like we don't know anything about him.
   
   

Rand Paul is projected to win re-election in his U.S. Senate Race in Kentucky.

Quote:I definitely agree that they should all be done on paper, especially being as that there is controversy during every election period. It's obviously an important issue.

It is so much easier to stuff ballot boxes and get away with it than it is to hack the booth without getting Snowden'd.

 

Quote:Rand Paul is projected to win re-election in his U.S. Senate Race in Kentucky.

Good. I look forward to supporting him in 2020.

Quote:Mexican food beating Trump? He won't be happy

And Hillary loooves tacos.

Quote:It is so much easier to stuff ballot boxes and get away with it than it is to hack the booth without getting Snowden'd.

 

Good. I look forward to supporting him in 2020.

 

So in other words there will be controversy no matter what.

Quote:Wow! You're stretching everything here way out of proportion. This is so not true. I'll address each point...


<ul class="bbcol decimal">[*]He's never talked about targeting religions. You'll have to explain this one in far more detail.
[*]He wants the press to be honest and has talked against the current situation where they say whatever the establishment wants them to say.
[*]Trump looks abide by the Constitution and in no way has ever talked against the separation of church and state.
[*]Waterboarding is a Hillary specialty. She's probably personally authorized it to be used.
[*]The rules apply to Trump, but clearly they do not apply to Hillary whatsoever.
[*]Trump has been a staple figure in America for a few decades, It's not like we don't know anything about him.
</ul>

I'd argue with you, but you're flat out wrong. This time tomorrow it won't matter. And you'll still be gullible and not educated on what the Constitution is supposed to preserve.

Quote:So in other words there will be controversy no matter what.

One of the two major party candidates has already filed a lawsuit and refused to accept the outcome of the election, which has turned his rabid supporters into a violent mob that will thump their chest and shout, "Come at me, bro!", to anyone who dares suggest that Trump lost because he straight up got fewer votes.

 

Yes, there will be controversy unless and until Trump tells his supporters to move on. He won't, so there will forever be people insisting that Clinton won in a landslide because tens of millions of dead people stole the race.

Quote:Why are people dissing Infowars on here? Despite some rather obvious bias, it's one of the most incredibly accurate news sites in the world.

Because there isn't an event conspiracy or position that Alex Jones haven't taken. He literally changes his stance and story by the day.


I remember hearing him call the Boston bombing a false flag it was a setup by democrates to frame the tea party. He went on for weeks about it. Now he Denys every calling it a false flag since they've caught and protected the Muslim kid that did it.


The real deal breaker for me was his years of anti-bank crony capitalist global conspiracy by the banks and wealth elites and then he was all in on trump day one.


In the end trumps better than Hillary but Jones ran smear stories about a gay rubio, an assassin father of ted Cruz, and so on, he's a shock jock that's it.

Quote:Trump supporters are like the Borg. I will not assimilate to join a legion that backs an unlikable pathological liar with bad ideas, thin skin and a lack of knowledge on the Constitution the role swears to uphold.

 

Yeah, so vote Hillary! 

 

Cmon Florida, we need this for Trump and for the United States

Josh Elliott ‏@JoshElliott32


Market update: Dow futures down 840 points.

(For context: the Dow lost 684 points the first day of trading following the 9/11 attacks.)

Great news!

 

 

https://twitter.com/AP/status/796235096164548608

 


<div><a class="" href='https://twitter.com/AP'>The Associated Press<span>Verified account </span>‏@<b>AP</b> </a> <a class="" href='https://twitter.com/AP/status/796235096164548608' title="10:16 PM - 8 Nov 2016">9m9 minutes ago</a>
</div>

<p class="">BREAKING: Republicans retain control of the Senate with victory in Pennsylvania.

<p class=""> 

<p class=""> 


 

https://twitter.com/AP/status/796234773261848576

 


<div><a class="" href='https://twitter.com/AP'>The Associated Press<span>Verified account </span>‏@<b>AP</b> </a> <a class="" href='https://twitter.com/AP/status/796234773261848576' title="10:15 PM - 8 Nov 2016">12m12 minutes ago</a>
</div>

<p class="">BREAKING: Toomey re-elected to U.S. Senate in Pennsylvania. <a class="" href='https://twitter.com/AP'>@<b>AP</b></a> race call at 1:14 a.m. EST. <a class="" href='https://twitter.com/hashtag/Election2016?src=hash'>#<b>Election2016</b></a> <a class="" href='https://twitter.com/hashtag/APracecall?src=hash'>#<b>APracecall</b></a>

Quote:Because there isn't an event conspiracy or position that Alex Jones haven't taken. He literally changes his stance and story by the day.


I remember hearing him call the Boston bombing a false flag it was a setup by democrates to frame the tea party. He went on for weeks about it. Now he Denys every calling it a false flag since they've caught and protected the Muslim kid that did it.


The real deal breaker for me was his years of anti-bank crony capitalist global conspiracy by the banks and wealth elites and then he was all in on trump day one.


In the end trumps better than Hillary but Jones ran smear stories about a gay rubio, an assassin father of ted Cruz, and so on, he's a shock jock that's it.

 

 

Interesting. I've just gotten to know about Alex Jones over the past few weeks, but he's been a blast to watch. Indeed though, everything with him is one kind of conspiracy theory or another. He claimed, though, that his takes and theories have been close to perfect over the past couple years, and I was starting to buy into that.

Quote:Trump supporters are like the Borg. I will not assimilate to join a legion that backs an unlikable pathological liar with bad ideas, thin skin and a lack of knowledge on the Constitution the role swears to uphold.

 

You're being officially called out.

 

You aren't going to be allowed to steal my Democrat/Borg analogy.  For the biggest reason, it simply doesn't fit.

 

Only the D votes in an assimilated fashion.  Around 90% or better for your demographic, isn't it?

 

THAT is assimilation, or is it some other -ation that sounds similar (and probably fits better, too?)