10-15-2017, 10:48 PM
This guy is way too special. It's not fair. He's a special talent. You have to get him a QB who can pass the ball and not constantly stack the box against him. You're shortening his career with those hits. We NEED him healthy.
(10-15-2017, 10:50 PM)GlockBortles Wrote: [ -> ]I dont think they care all that much. Marrone ran his mouth all summer about how he never wanted blake to throw. He doesnt care about saving fournette he cares about running his stoneage gameplan.
(10-15-2017, 10:52 PM)haveaseat Wrote: [ -> ](10-15-2017, 10:50 PM)GlockBortles Wrote: [ -> ]I dont think they care all that much. Marrone ran his mouth all summer about how he never wanted blake to throw. He doesnt care about saving fournette he cares about running his stoneage gameplan.
Well, look at who the QB is? Would you want him to throw? I'm just saying that this guy is a special talent. Compared to Michael Jordan/Bo Jackson potential. It's not worth shortening his career because this franchise holds on to QBs too long.
(10-15-2017, 11:11 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: [ -> ](10-15-2017, 10:52 PM)haveaseat Wrote: [ -> ]Well, look at who the QB is? Would you want him to throw? I'm just saying that this guy is a special talent. Compared to Michael Jordan/Bo Jackson potential. It's not worth shortening his career because this franchise holds on to QBs too long.
Unfortunately my friend we will have to wait another year but I can promise you this team will bring in at minimum 2 new qbs next year. A vet and a rookie unless they go after Cousins. This year was never about only this year. This was the first year of the Coughlin/Marrone regime. The qb position will be resolved we just saw the potential of this team and now it is painfully obvious we are a qb away from being an above .500 team consistently. Just a little more patience. We are almost to the light at the end of this 10 year tunnel
(10-16-2017, 12:27 AM)wrong_box Wrote: [ -> ](10-15-2017, 11:11 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: [ -> ]Unfortunately my friend we will have to wait another year but I can promise you this team will bring in at minimum 2 new qbs next year. A vet and a rookie unless they go after Cousins. This year was never about only this year. This was the first year of the Coughlin/Marrone regime. The qb position will be resolved we just saw the potential of this team and now it is painfully obvious we are a qb away from being an above .500 team consistently. Just a little more patience. We are almost to the light at the end of this 10 year tunnel
IDK about 2 QBs but I would believe one...I doubt they go after Cousins unless he will restructure his contract...We can get a brand new still wet behind the ears rookie QB for less out of the draft and keep longer, but knowing the Jags they will pick up some mediocre guy in the late 3rd round
(10-16-2017, 12:54 AM)lastonealive Wrote: [ -> ]Yes it will be the greatest show on turf throwing to Lewis hurns and Lee. The magic bullet is coming!
(10-16-2017, 12:29 AM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: [ -> ](10-16-2017, 12:27 AM)wrong_box Wrote: [ -> ]IDK about 2 QBs but I would believe one...I doubt they go after Cousins unless he will restructure his contract...We can get a brand new still wet behind the ears rookie QB for less out of the draft and keep longer, but knowing the Jags they will pick up some mediocre guy in the late 3rd round
With Coughlin here I’m sure we will bring in a vet and draft a qb in the first round. I wouldn’t mind a Garoppolo but I don’t think they want to hitch their wagons to someone else’s guy. I think they want their own qb to mold.
(10-16-2017, 01:18 AM)lastonealive Wrote: [ -> ]Mediocre qbs make mistakes. Replacing him with another mediocre one won't help. If there is a big upgrade out there sure.
(10-16-2017, 03:53 AM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]We dodged a major bullet today. I still wouldn't call it out of the woods quite yet everyone knows how tricky ankles can be the next day after the adrenaline wears off, but fingers crossed.
Regardless, while I certainly haven't been alone I have probably been the most consistent person saying we need to use Fournette more judiciously. Unfortunately the guys in charge don't seem to care about Fournette's 3rd/4th/5th/etc seasons. Which is understandable Coughlin is the oldest front office man in the league and Caldwell is on some of the thinnest ice in the league. Just sucks as a long term invested fan to see the FO care so little about the long term future.
(10-16-2017, 12:27 AM)wrong_box Wrote: [ -> ]Restructue what? Dude's on a one year deal and will have a record breaking contract next offseason.(10-15-2017, 11:11 PM)Etdavis2006 Wrote: [ -> ]Unfortunately my friend we will have to wait another year but I can promise you this team will bring in at minimum 2 new qbs next year. A vet and a rookie unless they go after Cousins. This year was never about only this year. This was the first year of the Coughlin/Marrone regime. The qb position will be resolved we just saw the potential of this team and now it is painfully obvious we are a qb away from being an above .500 team consistently. Just a little more patience. We are almost to the light at the end of this 10 year tunnel
IDK about 2 QBs but I would believe one...I doubt they go after Cousins unless he will restructure his contract...We can get a brand new still wet behind the ears rookie QB for less out of the draft and keep longer, but knowing the Jags they will pick up some mediocre guy in the late 3rd round
(10-16-2017, 03:53 AM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ]We dodged a major bullet today. I still wouldn't call it out of the woods quite yet everyone knows how tricky ankles can be the next day after the adrenaline wears off, but fingers crossed.
Regardless, while I certainly haven't been alone I have probably been the most consistent person saying we need to use Fournette more judiciously. Unfortunately the guys in charge don't seem to care about Fournette's 3rd/4th/5th/etc seasons. Which is understandable Coughlin is the oldest front office man in the league and Caldwell is on some of the thinnest ice in the league. Just sucks as a long term invested fan to see the FO care so little about the long term future.
(10-16-2017, 02:21 PM)Senor Fantastico Wrote: [ -> ]Last week people were saying keep Ivory off the field and give MORE touches to Fournette.
(10-16-2017, 02:21 PM)Senor Fantastico Wrote: [ -> ]Last week people were saying keep Ivory off the field and give MORE touches to Fournette.
(10-09-2017, 04:32 PM)Upper Wrote: [ -> ](10-08-2017, 08:40 PM)Frailbones Wrote: [ -> ]Who’s the guy who said we should cut back on how many touches Fournette gets?
I am one of the many who have said that. Why is this being brought up though? It's obviously an argument based on long term preservation, not to try to call it as a victory for one side or another after a month. If, and more likely when, Fournette is hobbled and banged up (if not worse) in week 14 in the heat of the division/playoff race we might wish we had curtailed his carries a bit when we were ahead by 2+ scores late in some of these games.
(10-16-2017, 02:56 PM)JackCity Wrote: [ -> ]Like Marrone said in his presser. When we win there's been zero complaints about Fournettes touches. When we lose its seems he's either had gotten too much or not enough.