Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums

Quote:Then it's a good thing that one person isn't responsible for creating laws.

 

Even if he has a pen?

Quote:Even if he has a pen?

Depends on the pen.

Quote:Heck, even Reagan's <a class="bbc_url" href='https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/docs/publications/usbudget/bus_1990.pdf'>own budget</a> submitted in 1990 concluded that his tax cuts had reduced revenue. His administration's words, no one else's. See chapter 4 page 4.

Revenues in 1981 roughly 590 billion revenues when he left roughly 909 billion...


In any given year a higher rate of taxation would lead to a static estimate of more revenue, that doesn't account for the dynamic view of how those rates would have influenced economic decisions and risk or take into account the long-term compounding effects of stimulated economic growth.

Quote:It's Pence. He believes the Bible should dictate law!!!

Childish, he believes the 14th amendment definition of person shouldn't be truncated by birth status avid that the first amendment means you shouldn't be compelled to violate your religious conscience just for the privilege of seeking a product or service in the public square.


If you have a disdain for people of faith that's your business, but you better have a much better understanding of the issues at hand!

Quote:Revenues in 1981 roughly 590 billion revenues when he left roughly 909 billion...


In any given year a higher rate of taxation would lead to a static estimate of more revenue, that doesn't account for the dynamic view of how those rates would have influenced economic decisions and risk or take into account the long-term compounding effects of stimulated economic growth.

That is not measuring just the effect of the 1981 tax cuts, however. Reagan's actions in '82 and '84 were huge revenue increasers. In fact some historians call them the biggest tax increases in peacetime. By broadening the base through his tax reform, he was able to offset the tax cuts of '81. It was a really great set of proposals, but it was NOT the '81 cuts that got that money coming back into the Federal system. Indeed, from what I understand most economists (including those that pushed for the '81 cuts, I believe), think that the effect cuts like '81 only have about a 35% payback through increased wealth offsets. This is not a bash on Reagan. He did a great job of getting down inflation, and I think the later base broadening was a really good thing. But the '81 cuts are given a ridiculous amount of the credit by those who want lower taxes on the rich.

Quote:dear lord he's running for President, not Pastor of the United States

 

you can be an [BAD WORD REMOVED] and still be good at your job

 

Andrew Jackson says hi...  If a leader hates or has no respect for a group of people, it's gonna be a bad time for that group of people while that leader is in power.

 

Just something to consider...

Quote:what's important:  Trump calling some lady a pig

 

what's not important: Hillary supporting jihadists in Syria who saw peoples head off with dull blades

 

Something trump would have done as well?  LOL, terrible arguement

Quote:Something trump would have done as well?  LOL, terrible arguement

 

im sorry, what would Trump have also done?  Arm jihadists?  BAAAHAHA ok man.

Quote:im sorry, what would Trump have also done?  Arm jihadists?  BAAAHAHA ok man.

The fact the he allegedly "might" have done it is WAY worse than her actually doing it. Crazy huh?

Quote:The fact the he allegedly "might" have done it is WAY worse than her actually doing it. Crazy huh?

 

lol good point

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/30/politics/d...index.html


Guess who wasn't just making things up...

[BLEEP] is rigged

Quote:<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/30/politics/debate-commission-trump-had-audio-issues/index.html'>http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/30/politics/debate-commission-trump-had-audio-issues/index.html</a>

Guess who wasn't just making things up...

So the folks in the back couldn't hear? Isn't this a good thing? The 80 million at home heard him loud and clear and are watching him go down like the Hindenburg.


May be finding himself in legal trouble now too.

Quote:So the folks in the back couldn't hear? Isn't this a good thing? The 80 million at home heard him loud and clear and are watching him go down like the Hindenburg.

May be finding himself in legal trouble now too.

They were the lucky ones who didn't hearthe interruptions and sniffling, and how he described his smartness.

I don't know, I don't know, but plenty of people are talking. Plenty of people are saying it, believe me, but maybe he was born with a silver spoon in his nose. Maybe, just maybe. I read plenty of tweets. Believe me folks. Ya never now. Just sayin.


I would like to know what kind of water he was drinking. He loved that stuff. Funny how he criticized Lil Marco for the same thing. But that piss looked good.

Quote:<a class="bbc_url" href='http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/30/politics/debate-commission-trump-had-audio-issues/index.html'>http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/30/politics/debate-commission-trump-had-audio-issues/index.html</a>


Guess who wasn't just making things up...

Yeah after he was told to not touch it. He jacked it up and now again it's always somebody else's fault with Donald.

Quote:Yeah after he was told to not touch it. He jacked it up and now again it's always somebody else's fault with Donald.

Trump, an unprepared buffoon, ignores instruction and messes up his own Mic?


Sounds like exactly what happened!! The delicious irony is too much.