Quote:Sorry, your Isis argument was blown out of the water. I'm not buying that anymore.
You have no basis to say we intentionally armed Isis, and it also has no relevance to this discussion. You're just trying to distract from this topic.
the thousands of reports say differently. but ya, continue to live in a fantasy where governments are just negligent and their right hand doesn't know what their left hand is doing.
it all falls into the corruption bucket whether you like it or not. deal with it.
not meant to distract. please, let's discuss the 25,000 and how serious this is to American policy.
Quote:Your perception on what is true is clearly subjective. This investigation is naturally subjective in nature. It isn't a math problem. There will be bias, regardless of what happens. However, if you want this investigation to have any sort of credibility, it needs to be performed by someone whose mission isn't already to take down Trump and elect Hillary Clinton.
Benghazi committee was bi-partisan.
You have zero credibility as to who is or is not objective.
The fact that you can claim the Bengazi hearings were bi-partisan without any sense of embarrassment proves as much....
It was a fishing expedition by republicans and democrats at the hearing attacked gop members and defended Hillary.
Don't be such a rube.
That one conservative fool that was lined up to be the next house speaker lost his credibility when he openly admitted that the hearings were meant to hurt Hillary's campaign for the white house.
But yah... Totes bipartisan.
Dude, did you even politics before trump?
Quote:the thousands of reports say differently. but ya, continue to live in a fantasy where governments are just negligent and their right hand doesn't know what their left hand is doing.
it all falls into the corruption bucket whether you like it or not. deal with it.
not meant to distract. please, let's discuss the 25,000 and how serious this is to American policy.
Lol, thousands of reports??? Trololol
If you think corruption is a big deal, it's a big deal. The reporting is that the 25k resulted in the ag not persuing a class action law suit where Americans lost their savings on a sham.
Yet another example of trumpettes ignoring any truth that exposes trump as the fraud and corrupt charlatan he is.
Quote:You have zero credibility as to who is or is not objective.
The fact that you can claim the Bengazi hearings were bi-partisan without any sense of embarrassment proves as much....
It was a fishing expedition by republicans and democrats at the hearing attacked gop members and defended Hillary.
Don't be such a rube.
That one conservative fool that was lined up to be the next house speaker lost his credibility when he openly admitted that the hearings were meant to hurt Hillary's campaign for the white house.
But yah... Totes bipartisan.
Dude, did you even politics before trump?
So you have an issue with Benghazi not being bi-partisan enough, but then think its totally fine for a Democrat AG who is an advisor, activist, and confident of Hillary Clinton's to investigate the Trump foundation. Then you attack me personally.
Quote:Lol, thousands of reports??? Trololol
If you think corruption is a big deal, it's a big deal. The reporting is that the 25k resulted in the ag not persuing a class action law suit where Americans lost their savings on a sham.
Yet another example of trumpettes ignoring any truth that exposes trump as the fraud and corrupt charlatan he is.
Yes, hundreds if not thousands. Educate yourself. Use google. Not like it matters though, even if the evidence is right there crapping on your head you will just say, "Wellll, they couldn't have done this could they? Nah, our government is pretty swell."
Who ignored this? I'm saying let's talk about the 25,000 and how obviously significant it is. Let's go. Please tell me it's SUPER SERIOUS.
Quote:So you have an issue with Benghazi not being bi-partisan enough, but then think its totally fine for a Democrat AG who is an advisor, activist, and confident of Hillary Clinton's to investigate the Trump foundation. Then you attack me personally.
Again, read.
The truth is not biased. I'm fine with the Bengazi hearings. But they clearly were not bi-partisan.
I'm pointing out that if you don't like trump being looked into, you'd be a total hypocrite and a shill if you are ok with all the hearings on Bengazi that Hillary has had to endure.
It's not that hard to understand.
And you called me a loon earlier. Don't whine when I respond in kind.
Poor Hillary being picked on for Benghazi. She clearly handled everything so well and is blameless. We did not lose one American life, remember? Gosh why can't people just forget about this? It's not like lives were lost or something.
Quote:Yes, hundreds if not thousands. Educate yourself. Use google. Not like it matters though, even if the evidence is right there crapping on your head you will just say, "Wellll, they couldn't have done this could they? Nah, our government is pretty swell."
Who ignored this? I'm saying let's talk about the 25,000 and how obviously significant it is. Let's go. Please tell me it's SUPER SERIOUS.
Read my posts. I already did. I'm not going to repeat what I just wrote like 30 minutes ago.
And again nothing has been proven that shows we intentionally armed Isis. The fact that you keep harping on something you can't prove is getting sad. You're embarrassing yourself when you keep bringing up nonsense.
Quote:Poor Hillary being picked on for Benghazi. She clearly handled everything so well and is blameless. We did not lose one American life, remember? Gosh why can't people just forget about this? It's not like lives were lost or something.
Lol. I keep forgetting that she killed those four on purpose.
I'm sure you guys were just a mad when people died under Bush, right?
Hypocrites
Quote:Read my posts. I already did. I'm not going to repeat what I just wrote like 30 minutes ago.
And again nothing has been proven that shows we intentionally armed Isis. The fact that you keep harping on something you can't prove is getting sad. You're embarrassing yourself when you keep bringing up nonsense.
You said yourself they were just short sighted. That is beyond naive. I dont know how one could be familiar at all with history and think such a thing, but you are one that has to be told by the government directly what is true. You're told what to think and it's always evolving and your truth is always changing.
You'll get up to speed eventually. Some kind of commission or declassification will reveal evidence so blatant that you will once again change your views.
Quote:Again, read.
The truth is not biased. I'm fine with the Bengazi hearings. But they clearly were not bi-partisan.
I'm pointing out that if you don't like trump being looked into, you'd be a total hypocrite and a shill if you are ok with all the hearings on Bengazi that Hillary has had to endure.
It's not that hard to understand.
And you called me a loon earlier. Don't whine when I respond in kind.
Well you were talking to yourself.
Quote:Lol. I keep forgetting that she killed those four on purpose.
I'm sure you guys were just a mad when people died under Bush, right?
Hypocrites
Dont Bush me to death. I hate that war criminal and would never vote for any Bush ever again. Unlike you, you're still suckling on Hillary's you know what
Quote:You said yourself they were just short sighted. That is beyond naive. I dont know how one could be familiar at all with history and think such a thing, but you are one that has to be told by the government directly what is true. You're told what to think and it's always evolving and your truth is always changing.
You'll get up to speed eventually. Some kind of commission or declassification will reveal evidence so blatant that you will once again change your views.
I've also said I disagree with this middle eastern policy we've had for at least 40 years.
The trumpette and conservative outrage on how we've destroyed the middle East was non existent until now. Hypoctrites...
Quote:I've also said I disagree with this middle eastern policy we've had for at least 40 years.
The trumpette and conservative outrage on how we've destroyed the middle East was non existent until now. Hypoctrites...
ive actually learned from the past and wish our country not to repeat it. you on the other hand are still voting for it. that's real smart. cry hypocrite all you want. you are still on board for it with your vote.
Quote:Dont Bush me to death. I hate that war criminal and would never vote for any Bush ever again. Unlike you, you're still suckling on Hillary's you know what
I won't Bush you to death if you stop Hillary-ing me to death.
How many times do I have to point out all the things I am opposed to regarding her policies and campaign???
We have more in common than we have opposed, my friend. That goes for copycat, jagwired, and JW
Quote:I won't Bush you to death if you stop Hillary-ing me to death.
How many times do I have to point out all the things I am opposed to regarding her policies and campaign???
We have more in common than we have opposed, my friend. That goes for copycat, jagwired, and JW
because you're voting for her... if I was voting for Jeb then you could talk about Bush. im not. im voting for the anti-Bush, the guy the Bush's attacked repeatedly
you're voting for a Clinton. they vacation with the Bush family and sit together at dinners for grand old times.
Quote:because you're voting for her... if I was voting for Jeb then you could talk about Bush. im not. im voting for the anti-Bush, the guy the Bush's attacked repeatedly
you're voting for a Clinton. they vacation with the Bush family and sit together at dinners for grand old times.
If it were Jeb Bush vs Clinton, this board wouldn't have half the posts it has now and I would be writing in Ron Paul.
Quote:If it were Jeb Bush vs Clinton, this board wouldn't have half the posts it has now and I would be writing in Ron Paul.
that's right. i would probably do the same thing
Quote:because you're voting for her... if I was voting for Jeb then you could talk about Bush. im not. im voting for the anti-Bush, the guy the Bush's attacked repeatedly
you're voting for a Clinton. they vacation with the Bush family and sit together at dinners for grand old times.
Look, I'm not sure how you got bamboozled into thinking that trump is going to be this amazing President, but I'm not buying it.
Jeb Bush is far more qualified than trump. You realize that trump basically said we'd go to war with iran is they antagonized one of our destroyers.
You realize how dangerous that is to say?
Hillary isn't a great candidate and a hawk, and a wall street Democrat. Trump is even worse.
Just listen to what he says about the middle East. His policies are more hawkish than Hillary's!
Quote:Look, I'm not sure how you got bamboozled into thinking that trump is going to be this amazing President, but I'm not buying it.
Jeb Bush is far more qualified than trump. You realize that trump basically said we'd go to war with iran is they antagonized one of our destroyers.
You realize how dangerous that is to say?
Hillary isn't a great candidate and a hawk, and a wall street Democrat. Trump is even worse.
Just listen to what he says about the middle East. His policies are more hawkish than Hillary's!
I have listened to his policies. Trump's most hawkish plan is to quickly eliminate ISIS. Every candidate has said they want to do this, even Hillary. Trump stated he wants to get out of the Middle-East after removing ISIS, and "possibly" leave behind ground forces to guard oil reserves from future terror organizations likely to spring up after their elimination. The difference comes where Hillary says she wants to continue arming "rebels" in the Middle-East and then establish a no-fly zone over Russian air bases in Syria. She wants to remove Assad from power then continue supporting Iran's nuclear rearming. Her continued arming of rebels will likely lead to more terror uprisings, where she will, again, have an opportunity to remove an established power (Like the Kingdom of Jordan) and insert her own puppet.