If Baalke then maybe he should get a chance.
Lawrence was the easy pick. He probably would of been crucified if not making that pick.
Campbell is the player we hoped CJ Henderson could be
Little has looked the part he last couple of weeks
Cisco seems to make an impact play or 2 a game
ETN is incomplete
IF alll can continue on the trend they played today that would be an A draft.
I got an idea. Let’s hire urban Meyer so we don’t mess it up….
“ Lawrence was the easy pick. He probably would of been crucified if not making that pick.”
Lol. You’ve been crucifying Lawrence since day 1 moron.
(01-09-2022, 05:31 PM)ClemsonRob Wrote: [ -> ]“ Lawrence was the easy pick. He probably would of been crucified if not making that pick.”
Lol. You’ve been crucifying Lawrence since day 1 moron.
QFT.
Urban likes speed. Wait until next year when #1 comes back and hopefully gets to play in the regular season. Tlaw will have his buddy from Clemson. Ofcourse urban got sacrificed. Plus most of this board is glad hes gone. I think balkie and urban made those draft choices together but who knows
(01-09-2022, 05:42 PM)Jag88 Wrote: [ -> ]Urban likes speed. Wait until next year when #1 comes back and hopefully gets to play in the regular season. Tlaw will have his buddy from Clemson. Ofcourse urban got sacrificed. Plus most of this board is glad hes gone. I think balkie and urban made those draft choices together but who knows
Of course you think Urban gets credit. Of course you do.
Khan ?
Nope. Listen, again, if the reports are true that top tier candidates are hesitant to coach this team under Baalke. He needs to go.
This team is still 3 - 14. It was under coached most of the season. Nothing was done in free agency. Baalke's history with the 49ers is enough for me not to trust him.
They got a home win over a team today that choked the previous week and also has a hard time winning in Jacksonville to begin with.
Little, Campbell and Cisco have shown promise. I can admit that. However. Little and Cisco were late RD1 and early RD2 prospects that fell due to injuries. (Just like Jack did in 2016).
Baalke never built an offense in San Francisco. Giving him another chance is how this team ended up with Henderson instead of Wirfs and Chaisson instead of Jefferson with Caldwell.
He needs to go. Start clean.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
(01-09-2022, 06:00 PM)StrayaJag Wrote: [ -> ]Khan ?
TONY Khan
In all seriousness, an astute member here pointed out today what a few of us had speculated around draft time.
Baalke has an affinity for players coming off injury who fall down boards. (Little, Cisco)
ETN was obviously a Meyer thing, and the players further down the draft haven't seen the field much or haven't made any remarkable impression.
Campbell is sort of the wildcard (to me anyway) - he seems more like a Baalke pick, but it's hard to have the same degree of certainty the other speculations seem to have.
(01-09-2022, 05:45 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (01-09-2022, 05:42 PM)Jag88 Wrote: [ -> ]Urban likes speed. Wait until next year when #1 comes back and hopefully gets to play in the regular season. Tlaw will have his buddy from Clemson. Ofcourse urban got sacrificed. Plus most of this board is glad hes gone. I think balkie and urban made those draft choices together but who knows
Of course you think Urban gets credit. Of course you do.
LMAO you always said urban was a 100% responsible for those picks...now if they pan out Urban doesn't get credit? such a clown... you definitely have UDS...
(01-09-2022, 06:03 PM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]Nope. Listen, again, if the reports are true that top tier candidates are hesitant to coach this team under Baalke. He needs to go.
This team is still 3 - 14. It was under coached most of the season. Nothing was done in free agency. Baalke's history with the 49ers is enough for me not to trust him.
They got a home win over a team today that choked the previous week and also has a hard time winning in Jacksonville to begin with.
Little, Campbell and Cisco have shown promise. I can admit that. However. Little and Cisco were late RD1 and early RD2 prospects that fell due to injuries. (Just like Jack did in 2016).
Baalke never built an offense in San Francisco. Giving him another chance is how this team ended up with Henderson instead of Wirfs and Chaisson instead of Jefferson with Caldwell.
He needs to go. Start clean.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
I see what you did there. LOL and agree except I thought Baalke only came on board in 2020. Nevertheless, Baalke needs to go. Like posthaste. Or sooner. It is my fervant hope that Shad is only keeping him during the coaching search and then tanks him.
Ah crap. They were both drafted in 2020 weren't they. Nevermind then.... After making an absolute Clown of myself
Doesn't matter. Baalke is toxic. He throws coaches under the bus. 4 years, 4 coaches. Not a good sign for anyone. Too many coaches just don't want to work with him. You don't want a GM that throws coaches under the bus like he does.
(01-09-2022, 05:25 PM)jaguarmvp Wrote: [ -> ]If Baalke then maybe he should get a chance.
Lawrence was the easy pick. He probably would of been crucified if not making that pick.
Campbell is the player we hoped CJ Henderson could be
Little has looked the part he last couple of weeks
Cisco seems to make an impact play or 2 a game
ETN is incomplete
IF alll can continue on the trend they played today that would be an A draft.
It literally doesn’t matter.
Baalke severing relationships with many NFL coaches is the reason he should go more so than player acquisition (which is also bad).
our record with Baalke in the building is horrific. It's time to move on.
(01-09-2022, 08:20 PM)Firesky Wrote: [ -> ]our record with Baalke in the building is horrific. It's time to move on.
Absolutely.
I enjoyed this win but it changes nothing I want a fresh start no more holdovers
(01-09-2022, 06:03 PM)Caldrac Wrote: [ -> ]Nope. Listen, again, if the reports are true that top tier candidates are hesitant to coach this team under Baalke. He needs to go.
This team is still 3 - 14. It was under coached most of the season. Nothing was done in free agency. Baalke's history with the 49ers is enough for me not to trust him.
They got a home win over a team today that choked the previous week and also has a hard time winning in Jacksonville to begin with.
Little, Campbell and Cisco have shown promise. I can admit that. However. Little and Cisco were late RD1 and early RD2 prospects that fell due to injuries. (Just like Jack did in 2016).
Baalke never built an offense in San Francisco. Giving him another chance is how this team ended up with Henderson instead of Wirfs and Chaisson instead of Jefferson with Caldwell.
He needs to go. Start clean.
Sent from my SM-G960U using Tapatalk
This. I have said this several times already. All three were actually looked at as possible first round picks. Before injury, Little was actually projected to be an earlier round 1 pick.
It's hard to give either of them any credit when a gamble was made. You picked the players that were best at those spots if going by earlier projections and
hoping that they recovered.
(01-09-2022, 06:10 PM)NYC4jags Wrote: [ -> ] (01-09-2022, 06:00 PM)StrayaJag Wrote: [ -> ]Khan ?
TONY Khan
In all seriousness, an astute member here pointed out today what a few of us had speculated around draft time.
Baalke has an affinity for players coming off injury who fall down boards. (Little, Cisco)
ETN was obviously a Meyer thing, and the players further down the draft haven't seen the field much or haven't made any remarkable impression.
Campbell is sort of the wildcard (to me anyway) - he seems more like a Baalke pick, but it's hard to have the same degree of certainty the other speculations seem to have.
If a GM sees a player who has been injured, a real gem, and speculates on that player - ok, it's a gamble but that's showing insight.
Baalke seems to make this his primary focus. So many torn ACLs and other injuries in all his picks, going back to San Francisco.
And there are a few things we're not talking about here . . .
We can talk about the players we picked in this draft, but what about the ones we left on the table?
What about the mediocre free agency in 2021? We had a massive amount of money for free agents and we did ok at best with that.
We had all the money and draft picks to make a huge splash this season. I don't think we did it.
(01-09-2022, 06:12 PM)nejagsfan Wrote: [ -> ] (01-09-2022, 05:45 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Of course you think Urban gets credit. Of course you do.
LMAO you always said urban was a 100% responsible for those picks...now if they pan out Urban doesn't get credit? such a clown... you definitely have UDS...
Of course you jump in to attack me while demonstrating your continuous ability to always be wrong. Did I say what I thought or did your leap to your usual boneheaded conclusion? We know the answer, because you're as predictable as the sunrise but much, much dimmer.