(12-17-2024, 10:42 AM)Jagwired Wrote: [ -> ]Here it is. The truth.
That's pure [BLEEP].
There were 17 FBI informants there. So what? 17 out of 2,000 is less than 1%.
More than 99% of those who entered sincerely wanted to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.
(12-17-2024, 04:40 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (12-17-2024, 10:42 AM)Jagwired Wrote: [ -> ]Here it is. The truth.
That's pure [BLEEP].
There were 17 FBI informants there. So what? 17 out of 2,000 is less than 1%.
More than 99% of those who entered sincerely wanted to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.
![[Image: GettyImages-1230453994-1.jpg?w=1280]](https://www.cbs17.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/29/2021/01/GettyImages-1230453994-1.jpg?w=1280)
LOL. Looks like more than 1% in this photo alone, just standing around taking pictures.
(12-17-2024, 09:48 PM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ] (12-17-2024, 04:40 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]That's pure [BLEEP].
There were 17 FBI informants there. So what? 17 out of 2,000 is less than 1%.
More than 99% of those who entered sincerely wanted to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power.
LOL. Looks like more than 1% in this photo alone, just standing around taking pictures.
Was Congress in session at that moment, or were they hiding?
(12-17-2024, 09:56 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (12-17-2024, 09:48 PM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]
LOL. Looks like more than 1% in this photo alone, just standing around taking pictures.
Was Congress in session at that moment, or were they hiding?
Pelosi was advised to have National guard present. She was in charge and declined, then it happened. There are videos on the net where she even says it. I believe her daughter filmed one. It was a setup and the Jan 6 was a taxpayer funded attempt to get the accountability away from her. That is why the documents were destroyed. You can find them. Since this does not fit with what you are attempting here I have little hope of anything but denials,delay and distraction.
(12-17-2024, 11:02 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-17-2024, 09:56 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Was Congress in session at that moment, or were they hiding?
Pelosi was advised to have National guard present. She was in charge and declined, then it happened. There are videos on the net where she even says it. I believe her daughter filmed one. It was a setup and the Jan 6 was a taxpayer funded attempt to get the accountability away from her. That is why the documents were destroyed. You can find them. Since this does not fit with what you are attempting here I have little hope of anything but denials,delay and distraction.
You didn't answer my question. Instead, you put out another red herring
Your reply is just like, if I left my front door unlocked, it's not trespassing if you come in and not stealing if you take my stuff.
(12-18-2024, 07:59 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (12-17-2024, 11:02 PM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]Pelosi was advised to have National guard present. She was in charge and declined, then it happened. There are videos on the net where she even says it. I believe her daughter filmed one. It was a setup and the Jan 6 was a taxpayer funded attempt to get the accountability away from her. That is why the documents were destroyed. You can find them. Since this does not fit with what you are attempting here I have little hope of anything but denials,delay and distraction.
You didn't answer my question. Instead, you put out another red herring
Your reply is just like, if I left my front door unlocked, it's not trespassing if you come in and not stealing if you take my stuff.
Whatever man, this whole thing was a setup. Just one attempt of many to suppress a political opponent. If you read the papers lately then you must know we had a vote recently. I do believe the majority of people are on my side on this one. Might want to mine in another spot, this one is mined out.
(12-18-2024, 08:48 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-18-2024, 07:59 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]You didn't answer my question. Instead, you put out another red herring
Your reply is just like, if I left my front door unlocked, it's not trespassing if you come in and not stealing if you take my stuff.
Whatever man, this whole thing was a setup. Just one attempt of many to suppress a political opponent. If you read the papers lately then you must know we had a vote recently. I do believe the majority of people are on my side on this one. Might want to mine in another spot, this one is mined out.
Look Fat, he knows what he saw that they showed him. He's emotionally invested in his position and never going to change it.
(12-18-2024, 08:48 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-18-2024, 07:59 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]You didn't answer my question. Instead, you put out another red herring
Your reply is just like, if I left my front door unlocked, it's not trespassing if you come in and not stealing if you take my stuff.
Whatever man, this whole thing was a setup. Just one attempt of many to suppress a political opponent. If you read the papers lately then you must know we had a vote recently. I do believe the majority of people are on my side on this one. Might want to mine in another spot, this one is mined out.
Great, next we can have elections about gravity and quantum mechanics. We could finally come up with a grand unified theory of physics if we just vote on it! I had no idea that majorities were so powerful, that their opinions could change facts, Thank you for enlightening me.
In seriousness, though, I said this would be the last thread on the subject and I didn't resurrect the thread this time.
Also, polls still say that people believe Biden won in 2020, that the January 6 riots were a violent attempt to overturn the election, and Trump more than anyone else instigated those riots. It's just that enough people were willing to overlook that as they either voted for Trump or stayed home.
(12-18-2024, 09:42 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (12-18-2024, 08:48 AM)Jag149 Wrote: [ -> ]Whatever man, this whole thing was a setup. Just one attempt of many to suppress a political opponent. If you read the papers lately then you must know we had a vote recently. I do believe the majority of people are on my side on this one. Might want to mine in another spot, this one is mined out.
Great, next we can have elections about gravity and quantum mechanics. We could finally come up with a grand unified theory of physics if we just vote on it! I had no idea that majorities were so powerful, that their opinions could change facts, Thank you for enlightening me.
In seriousness, though, I said this would be the last thread on the subject and I didn't resurrect the thread this time.
Also, polls still say that people believe Biden won in 2020, that the January 6 riots were a violent attempt to overturn the election, and Trump more than anyone else instigated those riots. It's just that enough people were willing to overlook that as they either voted for Trump or stayed home.
No issue, we just disagree. However were these the same poll guys that showed Harris ahead of Trump? That poor Iowa lady had to retire after she sold out.
(03-25-2024, 09:39 AM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (03-25-2024, 09:30 AM)snarkyguy_he_him_his Wrote: [ -> ]Are these John Kerry injuries or real ones?
I'm not counting a bruise or a splinter they got while getting their fat incompetent [BLEEP] out of the way.
Let's agree that John Kerry exaggerated each of the injuries he got purple hearts for.
Let's agree that most soldiers at the time would have said "NBD" to the type of injury Kerry got.
Do you mean to suggest that every single member of the DC metro police and Capitol police forces take the John Kerry approach to injury reporting?
If so, do you mean to imply that this makes it OK to push and shove cops and pepper spray them?
Does the Seattle police force have this apparent "John Kerry syndrome"?
(03-25-2024, 09:32 AM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]No, it doesn't, and the number injured in Seattle is irrelevant. The fact that you present the officer's death, which was not attributable to his injuries, as an argument, however, illustrates your bias. You're consumed by hatred of Trump and incapable of looking at the evidence objectively.
This isn't about me. This is about January 6. Stop making it about me. If you want a thread that's about me start a new thread.
It's what happens when they have nothing.
J6 Bombshell: Trump Didn't Just Offer Military to Protect Capitol, He Ordered It but Was Disobeyed
On the eve of former President Donald Trump’s return to power, a new report is turning the story of the 2021 Capitol incursion on its head.
For four years, a Democratic-run “select” committee on Jan. 6, anti-Trump Republicans, and the establishment media have blamed Trump for the violence in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021, but the report released Tuesday accused Trump’s acting defense secretary at the time, Christopher Miller, of defying Trump’s specific orders.
It’s the very first finding of the report, and it paints a scathing picture of Nancy Pelosi’s “select” committee — and former Rep. Liz Cheney’s role in the whole affair.
https://www.westernjournal.com/j6-bombsh...ivtps1uYCw
(12-18-2024, 11:32 AM)The Drifter Wrote: [ -> ]J6 Bombshell: Trump Didn't Just Offer Military to Protect Capitol, He Ordered It but Was Disobeyed
On the eve of former President Donald Trump’s return to power, a new report is turning the story of the 2021 Capitol incursion on its head.
For four years, a Democratic-run “select” committee on Jan. 6, anti-Trump Republicans, and the establishment media have blamed Trump for the violence in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021, but the report released Tuesday accused Trump’s acting defense secretary at the time, Christopher Miller, of defying Trump’s specific orders.
It’s the very first finding of the report, and it paints a scathing picture of Nancy Pelosi’s “select” committee — and former Rep. Liz Cheney’s role in the whole affair.
https://www.westernjournal.com/j6-bombsh...ivtps1uYCw
Maybe that's evidence that Trump didn't want the building to be breached.
But if he didn't want the building to be breached, why did he wait 3 hours before telling the rioters to go home?
(12-17-2024, 09:56 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (12-17-2024, 09:48 PM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]
LOL. Looks like more than 1% in this photo alone, just standing around taking pictures.
Was Congress in session at that moment, or were they hiding?
Irrelevant. You made a grossly exaggerated and indefensible claim, and I called you out on it, providing photographic evidence. Now you're just backpedaling to avoid admitting you pulled the 99% ratio out of your posterior.
Yes, a very small percentage of those who entered the Capitol had ill intent. Most were just angry over what they believed (rightly or wrongly) to have been an injustice. Others were simply following the crowd.
Signed,
Sneakers, your humble Guardian of the Truth.
(12-18-2024, 03:19 PM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ] (12-17-2024, 09:56 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]Was Congress in session at that moment, or were they hiding?
Irrelevant. You made a grossly exaggerated and indefensible claim, and I called you out on it, providing photographic evidence. Now you're just backpedaling to avoid admitting you pulled the 99% ratio out of your posterior.
Yes, a very small percentage of those who entered the Capitol had ill intent. Most were just angry over what they believed (rightly or wrongly) to have been an injustice. Others were simply following the crowd.
Signed,
Sneakers, your humble Guardian of the Truth.
My claim was that 99% of them were there intending to disrupt Congress. That photo catches them milling around because Congress was disrupted at that time. I am not backpedaling. I am proving my point.
You're a liar and you know it, so you have to be a bully on top of it.
(12-18-2024, 03:26 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (12-18-2024, 03:19 PM)Sneakers Wrote: [ -> ]Irrelevant. You made a grossly exaggerated and indefensible claim, and I called you out on it, providing photographic evidence. Now you're just backpedaling to avoid admitting you pulled the 99% ratio out of your posterior.
Yes, a very small percentage of those who entered the Capitol had ill intent. Most were just angry over what they believed (rightly or wrongly) to have been an injustice. Others were simply following the crowd.
Signed,
Sneakers, your humble Guardian of the Truth.
My claim was that 99% of them were there intending to disrupt Congress. That photo catches them milling around because Congress was disrupted at that time. I am not backpedaling. I am proving my point.
You're a liar and you know it, so you have to be a bully on top of it.
Bull [BLEEP] meter is at 10 DOOFS for that one.
(12-18-2024, 05:20 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ] (12-18-2024, 03:26 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]My claim was that 99% of them were there intending to disrupt Congress. That photo catches them milling around because Congress was disrupted at that time. I am not backpedaling. I am proving my point.
You're a liar and you know it, so you have to be a bully on top of it.
Bull [BLEEP] meter is at 10 DOOFS for that one.
We already know your BS meter is broken.
(12-18-2024, 05:51 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ] (12-18-2024, 05:20 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote: [ -> ]Bull [BLEEP] meter is at 10 DOOFS for that one.
We already know your BS meter is broken.
They hate the fact that their Orange Leader is a traitor.
(12-18-2024, 06:15 PM)TDOSS Wrote: [ -> ] (12-18-2024, 05:51 PM)mikesez Wrote: [ -> ]We already know your BS meter is broken.
They hate the fact that their Orange Leader is a traitor.
No, we hate the fact that your type is allowed to breathe our air..