Im very curious, what makes my question "off the wall"? It was a interesting observation I noticed and just wanted clarification from you.

Should I go in every thread you post in and comment about you? So, because I didn't go in one thread and post how you think I should means what exactly?

 

Like I said, posts speak for themselves.

---

TravC59, aka JacksJags. @TravC59 on Twitter
;
; "This is really good, you want a bite, Honey?"

Should I go in every thread you post in and comment about you? So, because I didn't go in one thread and post how you think I should means what exactly?

 

Like I said, posts speak for themselves.

 

No not every thread I post in, but the two topics I have heavily contributed to which are race and Tim Tebow.

 

You did it when it came to race, but I dont recall you telling posters in threads about Tebow "Now people have seen the light", when it came to the behavior of my posts. 

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

No not every thread I post in, but the two topics I have heavily contributed to which are race and Tim Tebow.

 

You did it when it came to race, but I dont recall you telling posters in threads about Tebow "Now people have seen the light", when it came to the behavior of my posts. 

Tebow and race have nothing to do why he is not in the NFL. None.

---

TravC59, aka JacksJags. @TravC59 on Twitter
;
; "This is really good, you want a bite, Honey?"

Tebow and race have nothing to do why he is not in the NFL. None.

 

Huh?

 

I said when it came to (discussing) race topics you kept telling posters "Now people have seen the light".

 

You didnt do the same actions when I was posting in the Tebow threads.

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

I am unable to "explain/articulate" his point because I dont understand it and see any relation to what I am saying. If its making you this upset and enraged that I am not giving you the answers you want to hear, then I cant help you with that.  You keep asking the same question 27 different ways, I am not going to change my response.

 

You are correct when it comes to regards to anyone being able to respond to anyone's response(s), but dont throw a female dog fit when someone dosent understand their point.

 

 

Okay, you could have simply said "hey, I don't understand your point, can you explain further"...  The only person who seems upset or enraged (well, I wouldn't even say enraged) is you.  It has nothing to do with giving an answer I want to hear.  It has to do with the fact you completely dismissed his post and didn't respond to it and also stating it had nothing to do with what you said when in fact it had everything to do with what you said.  

 

Again, no one is throwing a female dog fit in this thread besides yourself.  If you don't understand someones point than have them expound on it.  Don't say it has nothing to do with what you said especially if you don't even understand what he said. 

---

Huh?

 

I said when it came to (discussing) race topics you kept telling posters "Now people have seen the light".

 

You didnt do the same actions when I was posting in the Tebow threads.

One, I didn't tell people anything. They saw this on their own accord. Two, you asked why I didn't say anything in the Tebow thread regarding race. I didn't say anything because Tebow not being in the NFL has nothing to do with race. I don't recall the thread you are bringing up and how it went at all. Did race get drug into the conversation there too?

---

TravC59, aka JacksJags. @TravC59 on Twitter
;
; "This is really good, you want a bite, Honey?"

One, I didn't tell people anything. They saw this on their own accord. Two, you asked why I didn't say anything in the Tebow thread regarding race. I didn't say anything because Tebow not being in the NFL has nothing to do with race. I don't recall the thread you are bringing up and how it went at all. Did race get drug into the conversation there too?

 

He is stating why you said it in the race threads and not the Tebow threads.  He isn't implying race and tebow are connected.

---

Okay, you could have simply said "hey, I don't understand your point, can you explain further"...  The only person who seems upset or enraged (well, I wouldn't even say enraged) is you.  It has nothing to do with giving an answer I want to hear.  It has to do with the fact you completely dismissed his post and didn't respond to it and also stating it had nothing to do with what you said when in fact it had everything to do with what you said.  

 

Again, no one is throwing a female dog fit in this thread besides yourself.  If you don't understand someones point than have them expound on it.  Don't say it has nothing to do with what you said especially if you don't even understand what he said. 

 

Did you even pay attention to what you just posted?

 

I said I dont see or understand his point because I dont understand the correlation to what I am saying, yet you keep making these assumptions that im dismissing it. Once again, I acknowledged his point by not understanding it. If you call it dismissive then so be it.

 

 

One, I didn't tell people anything. They saw this on their own accord. Two, you asked why I didn't say anything in the Tebow thread regarding race. I didn't say anything because Tebow not being in the NFL has nothing to do with race. I don't recall the thread you are bringing up and how it went at all. Did race get drug into the conversation there too?

 

Tebow and race has no correlation.

 

Focus trav, focus.

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

Did you even pay attention to what you just posted?

 

I said I dont see or understand his point because I dont understand the correlation to what I am saying, yet you keep making these assumptions that im dismissing it. Once again, I acknowledged his point by not understanding it. If you call it dismissive then so be it.

 

 


 

Tebow and race has no correlation.

 

Focus trav, focus.

If Tebow were black we'd have a LOT fewer one post Tebros.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Okay, so why didn't you ask him how it correlated to what you said? This is simple stuff JFC. It does correlate. For whatever reason you can't see why. I also explained it using an example. No surprise you didn't even respond to it. I guess that is the difference between someone who is open minded and close minded.

---

No not every thread I post in, but the two topics I have heavily contributed to which are race and Tim Tebow.

 

You did it when it came to race, but I dont recall you telling posters in threads about Tebow "Now people have seen the light", when it came to the behavior of my posts. 

 

 

Tebow and race has no correlation.
 

Focus trav, focus.

You are one of the most confusing posters ever.

 

I already said Tebow and the NFL wasn't a race issue. The way you worded implied that Tebow and race were talked about.

 

But I digress....Let's assume you wanted me to read your mind and you simply wondered why I didn't post in the Tebow thread on how you were posting. Simple answer, because I felt no need. That good enough for you? I am sure there are plenty of threads and posts I haven't seen or posted in that you have. It happens.

 

And with that I am out of this thread. This is more round and round, bring up more pointless stuff to cover other bull. Tired of it.

---

TravC59, aka JacksJags. @TravC59 on Twitter
;
; "This is really good, you want a bite, Honey?"

You are one of the most confusing posters ever.

 

I already said Tebow and the NFL wasn't a race issue. The way you worded implied that Tebow and race were talked about.

 

But I digress....Let's assume you wanted me to read your mind and you simply wondered why I didn't post in the Tebow thread on how you were posting. Simple answer, because I felt no need. That good enough for you? I am sure there are plenty of threads and posts I haven't seen or posted in that you have. It happens.

 

And with that I am out of this thread. This is more round and round, bring up more pointless stuff to cover other bull. Tired of it.

 

 

He is stating why you said it in the race threads and not the Tebow threads.  He isn't implying race and tebow are connected.

 

Seems like JT understands it.

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

Seems like JT understands it.

Like I said, jt is a bright guy

You are one of the most confusing posters ever.

 

I already said Tebow and the NFL wasn't a race issue. The way you worded implied that Tebow and race were talked about.

 

But I digress....Let's assume you wanted me to read your mind and you simply wondered why I didn't post in the Tebow thread on how you were posting. Simple answer, because I felt no need. That good enough for you? I am sure there are plenty of threads and posts I haven't seen or posted in that you have. It happens.

 

And with that I am out of this thread. This is more round and round, bring up more pointless stuff to cover other bull. Tired of it.

---

TravC59, aka JacksJags. @TravC59 on Twitter
;
; "This is really good, you want a bite, Honey?"

Like I said, jt is a bright guy

I concur!!!

---

You are one of the most confusing posters ever.

 

I already said Tebow and the NFL wasn't a race issue. The way you worded implied that Tebow and race were talked about.

 

But I digress....Let's assume you wanted me to read your mind and you simply wondered why I didn't post in the Tebow thread on how you were posting. Simple answer, because I felt no need. That good enough for you? I am sure there are plenty of threads and posts I haven't seen or posted in that you have. It happens.

 

And with that I am out of this thread. This is more round and round, bring up more pointless stuff to cover other bull. Tired of it.

 

LOL, I never wanted you to read my mind.

 

It's interesting you felt no need (in regards to pointing out the behavior of my posts in that thread) though.

 

Like i said its very interesting and intriguing.

 

Now im bringing up "more round and round, bringing up more pointless stuff to cover bull".

 

Im not covering anything, I am just acknowledging your influence. 

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.

Okay, so why didn't you ask him how it correlated to what you said? This is simple stuff JFC. It does correlate. For whatever reason you can't see why. I also explained it using an example. No surprise you didn't even respond to it. I guess that is the difference between someone who is open minded and close minded.

 

I didnt understand his point and never thought about asking him to correlate with what I am saying.

 

I saw your example and thought I responded to it.

 

No im not closed minded, good try though.

---

Whether someone has a liberal, or conservative viewpoint, a authoritative figure should not lock a thread for the sole purpose to get the last word in all the while prohibiting someone else from being able to respond.