Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
It Just Takes 1 Win!

#61

Quote:It's amazing - people will want a few meaningless wins that will likely mean a 2nd tier QB and ANOTHER 10 years of mediocrity instead of getting the 1st pick in the draft and likely - although not guaranteed - a true franchise QB.

 

Come on - true fans are tired of the mediocrity and want to win in the long haul. 

 

TMD is right on target...
 

True fans want to win.  Period, paragraph.  Anything else is icing on the cake.

I'm condescending. That means I talk down to you.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#62
(This post was last modified: 10-19-2013, 12:17 AM by CSTblank.)

Quote:True fans want to win. Period, paragraph. Anything else is icing on the cake.
When three teams are vying for the #1 pick, there really are such things as meaningless wins.


Edit: I suppose you could call them harmful victories
Reply

#63

Quote:True fans Winners want to win.  Period, paragraph.  Anything else is icing on the cake.
 

Original true statement augmented for clarity. 

 

There is no such thing as losing for the greater good.

 

Only losing. 

 

Coughlin would be so ashamed.  And he's got his own problems.  I wonder who the Giants are tanking for?

Reply

#64

Quote:Original true statement augmented for clarity.


There is no such thing as losing for the greater good.


Only losing.


Coughlin would be so ashamed. And he's got his own problems. I wonder who the Giants are tanking for?


So .500 constantly missing out on top tier talent while staying .500 is better than 1-15 getting top talent and becoming better?
Reply

#65

Quote:So .500 constantly missing out on top tier talent while staying .500 is better than 1-15 getting top talent and becoming better?
While I understand the "Lose now so you can win more later" argument, there's no way, as a competitor, I can buy into it.

 

Losing now ALWAYS - repeat - ALWAYS sucks.  The Pats didn't go 1-15, get Tom Brady, and suddenly become successful.  The Steelers and Packers found their missing piece despite a lack of really bad seasons.  Arizona, Carolina, and Seattle didn't have to win the "QB X" sweepstakes to make SB appearances.  But all that is despite my main point.

 

Find me a coach that would accept 0-16 with a shrug and a fist-pump that he's picking first, and I'll show you a guy headed for the unemployment line.

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#66
(This post was last modified: 10-20-2013, 02:05 AM by The Mad Dog.)

Quote:While I understand the "Lose now so you can win more later" argument, there's no way, as a competitor, I can buy into it.

 

Losing now ALWAYS - repeat - ALWAYS sucks.  The Pats didn't go 1-15, get Tom Brady, and suddenly become successful.  The Steelers and Packers found their missing piece despite a lack of really bad seasons.  Arizona, Carolina, and Seattle didn't have to win the "QB X" sweepstakes to make SB appearances.  But all that is despite my main point.

 

Find me a coach that would accept 0-16 with a shrug and a fist-pump that he's picking first, and I'll show you a guy headed for the unemployment line.
 

Dude, the Niners went 2-14 to bottom out and then get Joe Montana and then win for 15 years, the Cowboys went 1-15 before winning 3 of 4 SB's starting 3 years later, and yes, the Patriots did bottom out before getting brady, it may not have been the immmediate season before, but prior to kraft getting that team they were in a horrible ebb period like we have been in, and then then in a few years they started their dominance that they currently reside in........please, just stop....

 

Nobody likes to lose. But bottoming out is sometimes necessary to reach the golden heights.  


Reply

#67

Quote:Dude, the Niners went 2-14 to bottom out and then get Joe Montana and then win for 15 years, the Cowboys went 1-15 before winning 3 of 4 SB's starting 3 years later, and yes, the Patriots did bottom out before getting brady, it may not have been the immmediate season before, but prior to kraft getting that team they were in a horrible ebb period like we have been in, and then then in a few years they started their dominance that they currently reside in........please, just stop....

 

Nobody likes to lose. But bottoming out is sometimes necessary to reach the golden heights.  
 

Gotta lose to win?

 

Spoken like a true loser.

Reply

#68

Quote:Gotta lose to win?

 

Spoken like a true loser.
 

I guess you like "winning" to "lose" better. 

 

At least my way generally culminates in great things down the road. 

 

What you hope for, generally leads to perpetual NFL purgatory. 

Reply




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!