Create Account



The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Richard Sherman done for the season.

#21

(11-10-2017, 04:56 PM)Kane Wrote:
(11-10-2017, 04:51 PM)jagibelieve Wrote: Of course you do snowflake.

Me and a few others would like to see victories against teams that put up their best.

Richard Sherman is Seattle's Jalen Ramsey.  I hate to see a player of that caliber (any player for that matter) to go down with a season ending injury.

Hey hey admin... snowflake comments go in political section!
I don't care where or how the Ws come personally....

Are you going to get extra cookies for having a team face of against the best of the best of the best?

You think Manning is sad he didn't face a fearful team in his first SB win instead getting to face off VS Rex frickin Grossman?

You should try to play nice Mr. Admin.

Hey hey user... since when is the term "snowflake" political?

This thread is about Richard Sherman.  I would much rather face a Seattle team with him starting than face a Seattle team with a backup.

Think about it this way.  Is an accomplishment (a victory) really an accomplishment if it's "easy"?  I would have liked to face Houston again with a healthy Watson just like I would like to face Tennessee with a healthy Mariota, just like I would like to face <insert team> with a healthy <insert player>.

To be the best you have to beat the best.


There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


#22

I see the point about playing a team at their best. But if those injuries occurred on the Jags, we’d be saying, ‘next man up’. Team would need to step up and perform. Does that not hold true to our opponents? Whichever year it was, last year or year before, we seemed to face every teams back up QB. They stepped up and handed us many L’s that year. So I guess I’m saying, “what’s it really matter?”
Reply

#23

(11-10-2017, 09:22 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: The "beat them at their best" theory is silly. I want these victories to be as EASY as possible. Why would you want it any other way?

Yes.

Nobody is shedding any tears for us because we lost Allen Robinson.
 

Worst to 1st.  Curse Reversed!





Reply

#24

(11-10-2017, 05:13 PM)jagibelieve Wrote:
(11-10-2017, 04:56 PM)Kane Wrote: Hey hey admin... snowflake comments go in political section!
I don't care where or how the Ws come personally....

Are you going to get extra cookies for having a team face of against the best of the best of the best?

You think Manning is sad he didn't face a fearful team in his first SB win instead getting to face off VS Rex frickin Grossman?

You should try to play nice Mr. Admin.

Hey hey user... since when is the term "snowflake" political?

This thread is about Richard Sherman.  I would much rather face a Seattle team with him starting than face a Seattle team with a backup.

Think about it this way.  Is an accomplishment (a victory) really an accomplishment if it's "easy"?  I would have liked to face Houston again with a healthy Watson just like I would like to face Tennessee with a healthy Mariota, just like I would like to face <insert team> with a healthy <insert player>.

To be the best you have to beat the best.

Yes. You beat your sister in an arm wrestling match? A win is a win.

A SB ring is a SB ring... doesn't matter who you faced to get there. Injuries pile up all the time in the NFL.
No matter the opponents or the state of their roster (ours is far from perfect/healthy halfway through the season) the wins count and a Superbowl victory would feel just as sweet if it came against the best the NFL had to offer or otherwise.

Snowflake is the right's term for the left... it's always been political in nature when used in the manner you used it.... but I digress.
To be the best, you have to make it to the SB and win. Period. Clots beat the Grossman led Bears... you think Manning gives a hoot he didn't face off VS the better NFC team that year? Nope. Got him his first ring.

The NFL has 32 teams, and no matter how bad any of them may be, winning in the NFL is never easy.
Think teams will feel bad beating us with AR15 out? With our OL falling apart as the season goes on?

Nahhh
Reply

#25

Snowflake is a pejorative for whiny college kids. Though they tend to be lefties, the commonality is that they're all whiny, entitled, spoiled brats.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!





Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!