He spent billions on twitter only to bankrupt it by allowing all of the foreign propagandists and smut peddlers back in that they had previously weeded out and lost his ad money as a result. He doesn't care, he wants the power of the platform to be able to push the propaganda. It's a cesspool there now by comparison. 

My understanding is the starlink stuff is being donated in certain areas and being paid for in others, as is the case with many countries and many states where he profits from the business. Kudos to him for waiving some fees in certain areas. 

Don't forget another starlink client , Russia, who use his starlink equipment to outfit/navigate drones that kill Ukrainians.

---

That's a lot of typing to say he lied and they called him out even though they agreed to let him lie.

No, the journalists get to lie with the veneer of legitimacy, that's how most debates go. What they did was what everyone knew they would do and why the Republicans put the clause in at the start. Everyone also knew they wouldn't be able to control themselves and just have to interject their bias into the debate. Then when Vance calls them on it live on television the True Believers want to act like he was wrong for doing so, while the Normies recognize that Vance was in the right.

I never said he was wrong to call them on it - I said it was weak. 

He was wrong to lie in the first place. They were wrong to deviate from the agreed upon format of letting him lie. 

Which is also pathetically weak.

---

https://twitter.com/DefiantLs/status/184...eJ0uw&s=19

Sent from my SM-S906U using Tapatalk

---

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."

You can find thirty more articles saying the same things from an array of sources. 

You always do this when presented facts you don't like. Attack the source. 
It's weak.

How 'bout you prove any of that article to be inaccurate?

The entire internet says he was right, including your boy Cuomo. You are shifting the goal posts in what was being fact checked.

https://twitter.com/saras76/status/18413...1dE3g&s=19

Hell has frozen over when Cumo defends a republican.

---

Jesus Christ, libs are stupid..

I know man. I can't do it anymore. Dude is off his rocker.  I've lost a couple of college buddies to NYC who were once normal. That place changes people.

You cannot get through to liberals, its is in their brainwashing.  They see a picture of trump and all they know is "orange man bad." Hopefully the American people has had enough of this insanity and boot Harris/Walsh back to where they came from.  Harris had had almost 4 years to implement her policies. She said she completely backed Biden's policies now she is flip flopping.

Kakula is a liar and a chameleon. She is whoever you need her to be for the moment but she is anything but authentic.

---

As far as who won the debate poll?

I have yet to see a single poll that says Tim Waltz won the debate. Every poll I have seen has Vance easily won the debate and actually impressed democratic voters.

This is coming from the NY times that is one of the most liberal news outlets in the country

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/02/us/po...-walz.html

CBS: The moderators (especially the blonde) looked like Childish mean old cat ladies. The blonde looked like someone took a dump in her cheerios. I feel bad for the man who deal with that. But even their biased take has Vance won:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-news-vp...poll-2024/

---

As far as who won the debate poll?

I have yet to see a single poll that says Tim Waltz won the debate.  Every poll I have seen has Vance easily won the debate and actually impressed democratic voters.

This is coming from the NY times that is one of the most liberal news outlets in the country

https://www.nytimes.com/2024/10/02/us/po...-walz.html

CBS: The moderators (especially the blonde) looked like Childish mean old cat ladies. The blonde looked like someone took a dump in her cheerios. I feel bad for the man who deal with that.  But even their biased take has Vance won:

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/cbs-news-vp...poll-2024/

The blonde, Margaret Brennan, is married to a lawyer, global business consultant and former Marine named Ali Iyad Yakub who is now the Principle of a D.C. consulting firm called Y2 Global Advisory. You'll never guess what he wrote: https://repository.law.miami.edu/cgi/vie...ext=umiclr

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Oh, okay. 

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/ukr...024-02-11/

You can trust that guy if you choose to. 

I do not. 

They keep finding downed drones with the gear onboard. 

Thanks for the article, though. Maybe that's legit, but if it is captured equipment, why is it so easily functional for the unintended purpose?  Technologically speaking, that should be easy to prevent, no? I'm sure if you have a starlink receiver in your home and you don't pay your bill, it will cease to operate. Why not here?

From the article:

…"If SpaceX obtains knowledge that a Starlink terminal is being used by a sanctioned or unauthorized party, we investigate the claim and take actions to deactivate the terminal if confirmed," it said…

---