Create Account

Jacksonville Jaguars Fan Forums The Gridiron The Home Team What Fantasy Geeks shouldn't talk football


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
What Fantasy Geeks shouldn't talk football

  • Offline JAGANTIUS
    Banned

  • Posts: 316
    Threads: 41
    Joined: Aug 2004
#1
08-17-2016, 02:40 PM

Listen to what the last Guy say's about Blake? Are you kidding me he's a bad QB? Come on dude I've been harsh on Blake in the past 

but he definitely proved he could be a top QB in this league Laughable. 

 

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/these-...p-so-fast/

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline J-Mizzal
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,756
    Threads: 116
    Joined: Mar 2006
    Reputation: 24
#2
08-17-2016, 02:42 PM

He puts up similar to better numbers then Luck, but he sucks  and Luck is the next great thing

<B><FONT color=cyan>Jags this is your year</FONT></B>
Reply

  • Offline HIGH SCORE
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,530
    Threads: 67
    Joined: Mar 2007
    Reputation: 1
#3
08-17-2016, 02:46 PM

So....your link? I don't get it.

Reply

  • Offline HIGH SCORE
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,530
    Threads: 67
    Joined: Mar 2007
    Reputation: 1
#4
08-17-2016, 02:47 PM

Oh....the video.

Reply

  • Offline ThunderCat
    Journeyman

  • ****
  • Posts: 1,733
    Threads: 33
    Joined: Oct 2005
    Reputation: 0
#5
08-17-2016, 02:54 PM

If the running game improves it is very possible that BB5 numbers go down. From a FF perspective that's not a good thing. You have to remember the context in which these nerds are projecting. Don't be so sensitive.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline jagibelieve
    Administrator

  • *******
  • Posts: 13,099
    Threads: 260
    Joined: Mar 2002
    Reputation: 276
#6
08-17-2016, 03:05 PM

Eh...  I take comments like that with a grain of salt.  You know the saying about opinions and a certain orface that everybody has...



There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

  • Offline JAGANTIUS
    Banned

  • Posts: 316
    Threads: 41
    Joined: Aug 2004
#7
08-17-2016, 03:06 PM

I think jag fans would be happy if we go 10-6 or 9-7 and Blake throws 25 td 9 picks I 62% completion that would be a better year for him

Reply

  • Offline The Holy Teal
    Rookie

  • ***
  • Posts: 374
    Threads: 8
    Joined: Jul 2011
    Reputation: 3
#8
08-17-2016, 03:20 PM

Quote:I think jag fans would be happy if we go 10-6 or 9-7 and Blake throws 25 td 9 picks I 62% completion that would be a better year for him


We would go crazy for 10-6 and those stats from Bortles.
Reply

  • Offline pirkster
    Hall of Famer

  • *******
  • Posts: 11,177
    Threads: 118
    Joined: May 2006
    Reputation: 74
#9
08-17-2016, 03:24 PM


What Fantasy Geeks shouldn't talk football
 


What? Fantasy Geeks shouldn't talk football?
 


What? Fantasy? Geeks? shouldn't talk... football.
 


What? Fantasy Geeks? shouldn't talk. football.
 


What Fantasy? Geeks shouldn't talk football.
 


What Fantasy Geeks? shouldn't talk football.
 


What Fantasy? Geeks shouldn't. talk football?
 


What? Fantasy Geeks? shouldn't talk football...
 


What? Fantasy Geeks shouldn't talk. football?
 


What Fantasy Geeks shouldn't? talk football?
"You do your own thing in your own time. You should be proud."
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline jagibelieve
    Administrator

  • *******
  • Posts: 13,099
    Threads: 260
    Joined: Mar 2002
    Reputation: 276
#10
08-17-2016, 03:24 PM

Quote:I think jag fans would be happy if we go 10-6 or 9-7 and Blake throws 25 td 9 picks I 62% completion that would be a better year for him
 

It's all about perspective.  From a FF perspective he'll be average to above-average.  He probably will not get the TD's that he had last season (35) and 25 TD's is pretty much "middle of the pack".  He does need to bring his INT number down as he had the most last season with 18.  Again 9 INT's would put him around average.

 

So from a FF perspective he's not all that big of a deal.

 

The last guy in the video is pretty much an idiot.


There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

  • Offline DragonFury
    Super Moderator

  • ******
  • Posts: 28,973
    Threads: 42
    Joined: Jul 2005
    Reputation: 90
#11
08-17-2016, 03:30 PM

RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE!!!

Reply

  • Offline HIGH SCORE
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 4,530
    Threads: 67
    Joined: Mar 2007
    Reputation: 1
#12
08-17-2016, 03:30 PM

Blake's TDs may dip a bit, but I think his yards go up this season. 

Reply

  • Offline jagibelieve
    Administrator

  • *******
  • Posts: 13,099
    Threads: 260
    Joined: Mar 2002
    Reputation: 276
#13
08-17-2016, 03:37 PM

Quote:Blake's TDs may dip a bit, but I think his yards go up this season. 
 

I doubt that... and not in a bad way.  You have to admit that a significant amount of his yards and TD's came during "garbage time" when the Jaguars were losing.  I'm willing to bet with a better run game and an improved defense some of his stats actually go down just a bit.


There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline JagFanatic24
    Hall of Famer

  • *******
  • Posts: 15,793
    Threads: 803
    Joined: Feb 2009
    Reputation: 184
#14
08-17-2016, 03:42 PM

What? Fantasy geeks, shouldn't talk football?
Reply

  • Offline knarnn
    Hall of Famer

  • *******
  • Posts: 19,654
    Threads: 692
    Joined: Sep 2012
    Reputation: 132
#15
08-17-2016, 04:13 PM

Quote:What Fantasy Geeks shouldn't talk football
What? Fantasy Geeks shouldn't talk football?
What? Fantasy? Geeks? shouldn't talk... football.
What? Fantasy Geeks? shouldn't talk. football.
What Fantasy? Geeks shouldn't talk football.
What Fantasy Geeks? shouldn't talk football.
What Fantasy? Geeks shouldn't. talk football?
What? Fantasy Geeks? shouldn't talk football...
What? Fantasy Geeks shouldn't talk. football?
What Fantasy Geeks shouldn't? talk football?


This made me laugh.
"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."
Reply

  • Offline imtheblkranger
    Hall of Famer

  • *******
  • Posts: 12,168
    Threads: 427
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Reputation: 344
#16
08-17-2016, 04:23 PM

Quote:I doubt that... and not in a bad way.  You have to admit that a significant amount of his yards and TD's came during "garbage time" when the Jaguars were losing.  I'm willing to bet with a better run game and an improved defense some of his stats actually go down just a bit.
 


Then again, he threw for over 100 yards in a quarter when we were beating the Jets and our running game was strong. It could go either way.
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Reply

  • Offline jagibelieve
    Administrator

  • *******
  • Posts: 13,099
    Threads: 260
    Joined: Mar 2002
    Reputation: 276
#17
08-17-2016, 04:58 PM

Quote:Then again, he threw for over 100 yards in a quarter when we were beating the Jets and our running game was strong. It could go either way.

I personally would just like to see improvement, specifically with the INT's.  The rest will take care of itself.  I'm not a big "stats guy" although I do play FF and watch both.  If Blake can minimize his mistakes and the Jaguars win, I really don't care much about what the stats say as far as number of TD passes, number of TD yards, etc.



There are 10 kinds of people in this world.  Those who understand binary and those who don't.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


  • Offline leopold332002
    Veteran

  • *****
  • Posts: 2,462
    Threads: 56
    Joined: Sep 2008
    Reputation: 23
#18
08-17-2016, 07:00 PM

that guy on the video is a joke. 

[Image: giphy.gif]
Reply

  • Offline imtheblkranger
    Hall of Famer

  • *******
  • Posts: 12,168
    Threads: 427
    Joined: Oct 2011
    Reputation: 344
#19
08-18-2016, 07:08 AM

Quote:I personally would just like to see improvement, specifically with the INT's. The rest will take care of itself. I'm not a big "stats guy" although I do play FF and watch both. If Blake can minimize his mistakes and the Jaguars win, I really don't care much about what the stats say as far as number of TD passes, number of TD yards, etc.


I'm with you. At the end of the day I just want a better comp % and less INTs, leading to wins. That being said, I'd love for him to lead me to my FF super bowl again lol
IT WAS ALWAYS THE JAGS
Reply




Users browsing this thread:

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.

Forum software by © MyBB - Theme © iAndrew 2017

ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!