The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
2019 Site Wide Mock Discussion Thead
|
Hes really fast and I think will be a solid receiver but I just think it was a reach especially when you have McGary, Gardner, Adderley on the board and bigger needs as well
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (03-26-2019, 08:39 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:(03-26-2019, 08:29 PM)JackCity Wrote: Some people have his age at 1995 which would make him 25 in march, which is what my comment said. Other places have him 96 so I got rid of it.If he lasts until the 4th round, you can change my avatar to anything you want. lol I don't doubt he might go higher than that. Just would have a hard time taking him over a lot of other WRs in that range. No doubt he'll be an amazing ST guy which Tom would love
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
I also think that's at least a round too early for McLaurin, but I do like him as a player. I'd probably go with one of the safeties there. No safeties have been drafted yet right?
Also, I apologize for somewhat deliberately throwing a spanner in the works by drafting Lindstrom for the Cards and Butler for the 49ers...
McLaurin appears to barely be a top 15 WR with some top 5 WRs still on the board.
This is just a loose ranking, but among those still available, the following appear to unanimously rank ahead of McLaurin
'02
(03-27-2019, 02:33 AM)Jags02 Wrote: McLaurin appears to barely be a top 15 WR with some top 5 WRs still on the board. Ridley would be behind him (03-27-2019, 02:48 AM)JackCity Wrote:(03-27-2019, 02:33 AM)Jags02 Wrote: McLaurin appears to barely be a top 15 WR with some top 5 WRs still on the board. Can you show me a ranking that lists Ridley behind McLaurin? I don't see any.
'02
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Yeah, I'd take McLaurin before Ridley but the rest I'd take before and add Isabella
(03-27-2019, 02:51 AM)Jags02 Wrote:(03-27-2019, 02:48 AM)JackCity Wrote: Ridley would be behind him He's right, after the combine most rankings will have McLaurin ahead of Ridley, but they'd be close. Ridley doesn't have enough production to get away with poor testing numbers. (03-26-2019, 07:53 PM)Cleatwood Wrote:(03-26-2019, 07:48 PM)flgatorsandjags Wrote: For me it would of been between McGary, Adderley, or Gardner. McGary would of been a good pickYea. McGary is good but Mclaurin is going to be a very good WR. At first read I felt overdrafted a little bit, but McLaurin might be my draft crush this year. I wouldn't complain if we took him there on darft day. (03-26-2019, 10:12 PM)JagJohn Wrote: I also think that's at least a round too early for McLaurin, but I do like him as a player. I'd probably go with one of the safeties there. No safeties have been drafted yet right? Murray and Lindstrom in one darft is half this MB's wet dream ![]() We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (03-27-2019, 07:55 AM)JagJohn Wrote:(03-27-2019, 02:51 AM)Jags02 Wrote: Can you show me a ranking that lists Ridley behind McLaurin? I don't see any. Actually, I take this back. 02 is right, there still aren't hardly any rankings that list McLaurin above Ridley... That surprised me.
Jeffery Simmons - DT - Mississippi St. would be really tempting to me if he is still there at our 2nd round pick...I understand the ACL but if healthy he was a top 5 pick.
Dareus gone next year and Simmons stepping in would be really nice... We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (03-27-2019, 09:15 AM)BlueEyedJag Wrote: Jeffery Simmons - DT - Mississippi St. would be really tempting to me if he is still there at our 2nd round pick...I understand the ACL but if healthy he was a top 5 pick.I was actually choosing between McLaurin, Simmons and McGary. I have no issues with Simmons but I think the Jags want day 1 difference makers for this season with their first 3 picks. Simmons, Bryan and Yan would be really good together when the older guys leave.
(03-27-2019, 10:07 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:(03-27-2019, 09:15 AM)BlueEyedJag Wrote: Jeffery Simmons - DT - Mississippi St. would be really tempting to me if he is still there at our 2nd round pick...I understand the ACL but if healthy he was a top 5 pick.I was actually choosing between McLaurin, Simmons and McGary. I have no issues with Simmons but I think the Jags want day 1 difference makers for this season with their first 3 picks. Simmons would have to put on a little size. We are bad enough against the run as it is. We need a NT for whoever is gonna replace Dareus
(03-27-2019, 10:38 AM)flgatorsandjags Wrote:(03-27-2019, 10:07 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: I was actually choosing between McLaurin, Simmons and McGary. I have no issues with Simmons but I think the Jags want day 1 difference makers for this season with their first 3 picks. Simmons isn't a slouch when it comes to run defense...he has the frame and a year to add more bulk but the dude is legit as is @ 305. |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.