Create Account


Board Performance Issues We are aware of performance issues on the board and are working to resolve them! The board may be intermittently unavailable during this time. (May 07) x


The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
2020 Presidental Election


(12-02-2020, 09:30 AM)flsprtsgod Wrote:
(12-02-2020, 08:59 AM)Sneakers Wrote: I have read his post and can find proclamation of neither guilt, nor innocence.  The first sentence opines that political motives may be driving certain investigations.  The second predicts Trump's legal response to any charges that may be brought and the eventual settlement structure of said charges.

Your hatred of Trump blinds you.

Uh oh, you're about to get banished to the kiddie table. If you really upset him you might even get what he thinks is a funny nickname! Of course he's about as witty as earwax, so it will be fine I'm sure.

The Kidde Table - Reserved seating for those who question "Because I said so."

Nicknames are GREAT!  Did you get one?  This forum is just a battle of wits.............when he uses nicknames, you know he's out of ammo!
When you get into the endzone, act like you've been there before.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(12-01-2020, 10:51 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: Meh, it's nothing more than a bunch of posturing by politically ambitious lawyers who want a piece of orangeman as a trophy. Trump will counter with a team of high dollar attorneys and it will be whittled down to a parking ticket, if anything, about the time Biden leaves office.

He needs to drop Guiliani and go back to his Michael Cohen days where he's just pay cash via crooked attorneys to cover up his unlawful dealings.  I agree that he will avoid any jailtime so it's probably time for him to make some $$$.
Reply


Why was Ivanka deposed yesterday?
Reply

(This post was last modified: 12-03-2020, 09:30 AM by homebiscuit.)

(12-03-2020, 09:02 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: Why was Ivanka deposed yesterday?

[font=arial, sans-serif][font=arial, sans-serif][font=arial, sans-serif]https://lmgtfy.app/?q=Ivanka+Trump+deposed[/font][/font][/font]
Reply


(12-03-2020, 09:02 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: Why was Ivanka deposed yesterday?

For being hot and successful.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(12-03-2020, 09:15 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:
(12-03-2020, 09:02 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: Why was Ivanka deposed yesterday?

[font=arial, sans-serif][font=arial, sans-serif][font=arial, sans-serif]https://lmgtfy.app/?q=Ivanka+Trump+deposed[/font][/font][/font]
So self dealing? Got it.
Reply


(12-03-2020, 09:31 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:
(12-03-2020, 09:15 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: [font=arial, sans-serif][font=arial, sans-serif][font=arial, sans-serif]https://lmgtfy.app/?q=Ivanka+Trump+deposed[/font][/font][/font]
So self dealing? Got it.

Apparently you don't. She was deposed, not convicted.
Reply


(12-03-2020, 09:36 AM)homebiscuit Wrote:
(12-03-2020, 09:31 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: So self dealing? Got it.

Apparently you don't. She was deposed, not convicted.
Hahaha oooook


Basically ivanka, chairwoman of the inaugural committee, was informed before the inauguration that the initial amount the TRUMP hotel intended to charge the nonprofit inaugural committee $450,000 a day was considered too much.

They lowered it to $175k a day which hotel staff said was still too much. 

Basically self dealing. She owns the hotel and they are using tax dollars to try to jack up the price.

The whole presidency is self dealing in my opinion. Every time he goes to his hotel or club, tax payer money is used and he charges the government.
Reply


(12-03-2020, 09:43 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:
(12-03-2020, 09:36 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: Apparently you don't. She was deposed, not convicted.
Hahaha oooook


Basically ivanka, chairwoman of the inaugural committee, was informed before the inauguration that the initial amount the TRUMP hotel intended to charge the nonprofit inaugural committee $450,000 a day was considered too much.

They lowered it to $175k a day which hotel staff said was still too much. 

Basically self dealing. She owns the hotel and they are using tax dollars to try to jack up the price.

The whole presidency is self dealing in my opinion. Every time he goes to his hotel or club, tax payer money is used and he charges the government.


I agree, they should not have done that. It's unseemly.
“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



(12-03-2020, 09:43 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:
(12-03-2020, 09:36 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: Apparently you don't. She was deposed, not convicted.
Hahaha oooook


Basically ivanka, chairwoman of the inaugural committee, was informed before the inauguration that the initial amount the TRUMP hotel intended to charge the nonprofit inaugural committee $450,000 a day was considered too much.

They lowered it to $175k a day which hotel staff said was still too much. 

Basically self dealing. She owns the hotel and they are using tax dollars to try to jack up the price.

The whole presidency is self dealing in my opinion. Every time he goes to his hotel or club, tax payer money is used and he charges the government.

Understood. I got ahead of my skis, there. My bad.
Reply


(12-03-2020, 09:43 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:
(12-03-2020, 09:36 AM)homebiscuit Wrote: Apparently you don't. She was deposed, not convicted.
Hahaha oooook


Basically ivanka, chairwoman of the inaugural committee, was informed before the inauguration that the initial amount the TRUMP hotel intended to charge the nonprofit inaugural committee $450,000 a day was considered too much.

They lowered it to $175k a day which hotel staff said was still too much. 

Basically self dealing. She owns the hotel and they are using tax dollars to try to jack up the price.

The whole presidency is self dealing in my opinion. Every time he goes to his hotel or club, tax payer money is used and he charges the government.

It is quite a change of pace having a president who was wealthy BEFORE he became POTUS versus AFTER. 

I'm sure if Obama was wealthy enough to own a hotel before his 65 million dollar Netflix deal & 65 million dollar book deal, you would have seen similar shenanigans.
Reply


(12-03-2020, 10:05 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote:
(12-03-2020, 09:43 AM)Cleatwood Wrote: Hahaha oooook


Basically ivanka, chairwoman of the inaugural committee, was informed before the inauguration that the initial amount the TRUMP hotel intended to charge the nonprofit inaugural committee $450,000 a day was considered too much.

They lowered it to $175k a day which hotel staff said was still too much. 

Basically self dealing. She owns the hotel and they are using tax dollars to try to jack up the price.

The whole presidency is self dealing in my opinion. Every time he goes to his hotel or club, tax payer money is used and he charges the government.

It is quite a change of pace having a president who was wealthy BEFORE he became POTUS versus AFTER. 

I'm sure if Obama was wealthy enough to own a hotel before his 65 million dollar Netflix deal & 65 million dollar book deal, you would have seen similar shenanigans.
This was your takeaway?
Reply


(12-03-2020, 10:24 AM)Cleatwood Wrote:
(12-03-2020, 10:05 AM)StroudCrowd1 Wrote: It is quite a change of pace having a president who was wealthy BEFORE he became POTUS versus AFTER. 

I'm sure if Obama was wealthy enough to own a hotel before his 65 million dollar Netflix deal & 65 million dollar book deal, you would have seen similar shenanigans.
This was your takeaway?

My takeaway is that this kind of thing happens all the time, and having seen first hand in my job where some of our tax dollars go, this doesn't bother me in the least.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!



In the grand scheme of things this is a one-off low level event. During the last four years Trump has been scrutinized up and down every time a Trump property was involved in White House travel.

With that being said, does anyone honestly believe this DA would be so driven if a democrat was involved? The amount of money concerned in this suit is a pittance compared to the malfeasance and corruption payoffs that occur on a daily basis with politicians of every stripe in D.C. Ask Hunter, he knows.
Reply

(This post was last modified: 12-03-2020, 11:20 AM by The Real Marty.)

As if things can't get any wackier- 

Roger Stone says he has absolutely irrefutable evidence that North Korean boats delivered ballots through a Maine harbor.  

https://www.newsweek.com/roger-stone-say...ud-1551937

Michael Flynn, who just got a pardon, has called on President Trump to declare martial law and have the military run a do-over election.  

https://news.yahoo.com/freshly-pardoned-...08613.html

Yesterday, Rudy Giuliani's "witness" turned the crazy up to 11.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/rudy-giuli...ud-hearing
Reply


(12-03-2020, 11:11 AM)The Real Marty Wrote: As if things can't get any wackier- 

Roger Stone says he has absolutely irrefutable evidence that North Korean boats delivered ballots through a Maine harbor.  

https://www.newsweek.com/roger-stone-say...ud-1551937

Michael Flynn, who just got a pardon, has called on President Trump to declare martial law and have the military run a do-over election.  

https://news.yahoo.com/freshly-pardoned-...08613.html

Yesterday, Rudy Giuliani's "witness" turned the crazy up to 11.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/rudy-giuli...ud-hearing

This is almost as off-the-rails as the Brett Kavanaugh accusations.
Reply


I knew that lady was going to take center stage in the media. She was the only witness that looked like a crazy, conspiracy theorist. Her story (not her claims at the end) was corroborated by two witnesses that saw the same thing. That lady was there working on behalf of dominion. I'm sure no one hear watched the actual hearings. There is legit disenfranchisement taking place in this democrat districts.
Reply

We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!


(This post was last modified: 12-03-2020, 12:15 PM by The Real Marty.)

(12-03-2020, 11:48 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: I knew that lady was  going to take center stage in the media. She was the only witness that looked like a crazy, conspiracy theorist. Her story (not her claims at the end) was corroborated by two witnesses that saw the same thing. That lady was there working on behalf of dominion. I'm sure no one hear watched the actual hearings. There is legit disenfranchisement taking place in this democrat districts.

Come on, man.  Every time one of these crazy election fraud theories gets completely refuted, another one pops up.  How long is this going to go on?

I think the problem is, Trump supporters started with a default position that election fraud happened.  Then they went searching for evidence.  Isn't that backwards?  Aren't you supposed to have some evidence and then make the claim?  

The reason they started with that default position "election fraud happened" was because Trump told them so.  He's the first one to make the claim, and he made the claim without any evidence, because he was making the claim before people even started to vote!  

My default position is "prove it," because the person initiating these claims is the biggest liar in the history of politics.
Reply


(12-03-2020, 12:10 PM)The Real Marty Wrote:
(12-03-2020, 11:48 AM)Lucky2Last Wrote: I knew that lady was  going to take center stage in the media. She was the only witness that looked like a crazy, conspiracy theorist. Her story (not her claims at the end) was corroborated by two witnesses that saw the same thing. That lady was there working on behalf of dominion. I'm sure no one hear watched the actual hearings. There is legit disenfranchisement taking place in this democrat districts.

Come on, man.  Every time one of these crazy election fraud theories gets completely refuted, another one pops up.  How long is this going to go on?

Until the Georgia Senate runoff election is my guess. Stirring up the base.
Reply


(12-03-2020, 12:16 PM)homebiscuit Wrote:
(12-03-2020, 12:10 PM)The Real Marty Wrote: Come on, man.  Every time one of these crazy election fraud theories gets completely refuted, another one pops up.  How long is this going to go on?

Until the Georgia Senate runoff election is my guess. Stirring up the base.

Speaking of that, 

Trump Allies Urge GA Republicans to Boycott Runoff
Reply




Users browsing this thread:
27 Guest(s)

The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.


ABOUT US
The Jungle Forums is the Jaguars' biggest fan message board. Talking about the Jags since 2006, the Jungle was the team-endorsed home of all things Jaguars.

Since 2017, the Jungle is now independent of the team but still run by the same crew. We are here to support and discuss all things Jaguars and all things Duval!