The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
Minshew lovers> He still looked bad.
|
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (12-13-2020, 06:01 PM)CanDoBetter Wrote: Glennon was bad today but it's fairly obvious that it's because of Minshew the O-line sometimes looks bad. He's in the pocket so why can't he use it like Mike ******* Glennon? He scrambles a soon as his first read isn't there. Granted, when it works it's electric but it doesn't work a lot. I’ve got to say, while watching the first half, I was wondering why the o-line couldn’t hold up like that all the time. Glennon seemed to have time to read and throw. Then Minshew comes in and it “collapsed”. You may have hit the nail on the head there.
(12-13-2020, 05:38 PM)Newton Wrote: I think having Minshew fight it out with fields for the start is the way to go next year. He is a very capable player, and it’s not like these team has been a great situation for anyone to succeed in this year. That's going to be a short fight. Fields has better arm, bigger, faster....
I’ve seen all i need to see from minshew. He’s not the guy. He’s a good backup. If we get rid of them all, I’m ok with it too.
Let's Get Em!!!! Go Jags!
(12-13-2020, 08:43 PM)Rockman1966 Wrote:(12-13-2020, 05:38 PM)Newton Wrote: I think having Minshew fight it out with fields for the start is the way to go next year. He is a very capable player, and it’s not like these team has been a great situation for anyone to succeed in this year. well, that is a good problem to have then. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
(12-13-2020, 06:48 PM)homebiscuit Wrote:Correct. Wish we could get the first, but the jets are looking like an 0-16 team(12-13-2020, 06:40 PM)JagFan81 Wrote: Hahaha!! A few weeks ago Luton was the next Brady, then Glennon was a smart vet...Anyone but Minshew eh? And we wonder why no one stays past their rookie deals. Yes, it's improvement, but it's Blaine Gabbert 2012 level improvement. - Pirkster The Home Hypnotist! Media on the Brain Link! Quote:Peyton must store oxygen in that forehead of his. No way I'd still be alive after all that choking.
(12-13-2020, 10:42 PM)HandsomeRob86 Wrote:(12-13-2020, 06:48 PM)homebiscuit Wrote: Best chance to win the second pick in the draft.Correct. Wish we could get the first, but the jets are looking like an 0-16 team I can see it now... The Pats will make sure they lose in week 17 vs the Jets, just to keep Lawrence out of the Division, only for us to win in week 17 vs the colts and screw everything up. I'd almost put money on it, sadly.
For those who think that the criticisms against their favorite player from places like freaking "duvalpride.com" or Twitter have any impact should stop being full of themselves.
Furthermore, if my starting "franchise" QB is mentally prone to such menial outlets and affects his performance on the field, then that's not a player that I want leading/playing in the hardest position in the NFL. If you think this is bad where people point out shortcomings, what the hell do you think happens in places like the New York media market? Yikes. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
We’ll look back at Minshew as our love affair mistress
It looked good in the beginning, like this could be something special, he’s my soulmate. Only to see his true colors emerge over time. A rebound relationship an affair or whatever you’d like to call it.
We've had, what 2 good QB in Brunell and Garrard. Everyone else has brought a unique kind of suckiness to the team
(12-14-2020, 04:03 AM)captivating Wrote: We've had, what 2 good QB in Brunell and Garrard. Everyone else has brought a unique kind of suckiness to the team You do know that Blake Bortles has more playoff wins, and bettertter statistical numbers Stan David Garrard right? Now David Garrard has more regular-season wins then Blake Bortles but he did have a better roster around him then Blake had overall. ![]() We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! (12-14-2020, 07:15 AM)leopold332002 Wrote:(12-14-2020, 04:03 AM)captivating Wrote: We've had, what 2 good QB in Brunell and Garrard. Everyone else has brought a unique kind of suckiness to the team Man if you can objectively look at Garrard and Bortles and think Bortles was the better QB, IDK what to tell you. And I don't know that Garrard had a better roster. I think 2017 D was better by a wide margin than 2007 D. And on the outside I'd take 2017 WRs over Williams, Jones, and Northcutt. The only thing Garrard had that was clearly better was the backfield (and 2017 was Lenny's best year) and maaaaybe the OL and TE spots. More playoff wins, by like what, one? Give me a break.
(12-14-2020, 12:08 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote:(12-14-2020, 04:03 AM)captivating Wrote: We've had, what 2 good QB in Brunell and Garrard. Everyone else has brought a unique kind of suckiness to the team He was an NFL caliber starting QB, he was never just a guy. “An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato
(12-14-2020, 12:18 PM)flsprtsgod Wrote:(12-14-2020, 12:08 PM)TheO-LineMatters Wrote: I would hardly call Garrard good. He was just a guy. He was a good game manager capable of moving the sticks with his legs. I'd take him over Trent Dilfer and Brad Johnson, Super Bowl winning game managers.
"I am only an average man, but by George, I work harder at it than the average man." - Teddy Roosevelt
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Doesnt matter at this point really.
Bengals will take Sewell if they’re picking #2. Still leaving us with our choice of QB after Lawerence.
So the jags can get the first pick if the jets win one or all the way to the 3rd pick im guessing and no worse. It looks like the jags have the 26th pick also as of now (rams)
|
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.