Well... Richardson netted the team that drafted him a first round pick and we got bupkis for Fournette, so there's that...

---

I like how you conveniently left off year 3 when Fournette had a total of 1,700 yards whereas Richardson only had 750 total yards.  

---

Getting hung up on stats like that is why some people can't see the forest for the trees.

He's bad, he had 1700 yards that lead to 3 TDS and a 6-10 record. Fournette's stats are the product of a regime trying to manufacture stats for a guy that was a massive draft bust. That no one was willing to trade for him going into this season (after his super awesome 1700 yards), and he's just a backup now says all you need to know. He was a Trent Richardson level bust.

Not a bust.  Busts don't continue to produce like this. They flame out. 

He was just severely overdrafted. 

Over 100 all purpose yards and a TD last night in the wildcard game.

---

I have been saying this. Hes a good running back. With the jags, he had to run against run stacked boxes

---

I have been saying this. Hes a good running back. With the jags, he had to run against run stacked boxes

First decent game with the bucs lol.

He is not even a starter and only had 367 yards with 3.8 per carry in the season. Yeah, he is so good.

---

I am a fan, not a cheerleader.

A 91 yard effort against a sub .500 team is what got you guys thumping your chest?

Will Tampa sign him back for next year?

---

^^ the redskins have a good defense. Either way, we will see how things play out. His "stock" is low. Good time to buy

---

A 91 yard effort against a sub .500 team is what got you guys thumping your chest?

Will Tampa sign him back for next year?

No, your failed attempt to re-define the word "bust" was my point, actually.

---

Angry fournette is coming for the Saints.. word to the wise

---