Boston University researchers claim to have developed new, more lethal COVID strain in lab
Researchers at Boston University added a spike protein from the Omicron variant with the original Wuhan strain, which has an 80% kill rate

https://www.foxnews.com/us/boston-univer...strain-lab

---

Man, these scumbags are low...they are trying to cover their [BLEEP] by mandating that kids get the vaccine.

https://twitter.com/RepThomasMassie/stat...o3bcPUBYZQ

---

"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"

Ernest Ramirez’s 16 year-old son died just five days after getting Pfizer’s Covid vaccine. Mr. Ramirez says FEMA asked him to change his son’s death certificate and in return they offered to pay for the funeral.


https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/16...r-vaccine/

Honest question, so please answer earnestly. 

How can a parent change the cause of death on a death certificate? 

More importantly, how can a parent stop the government from changing the cause of death on a death certificate?

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Ernest Ramirez’s 16 year-old son died just five days after getting Pfizer’s Covid vaccine. Mr. Ramirez says FEMA asked him to change his son’s death certificate and in return they offered to pay for the funeral.


https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/16...r-vaccine/

Honest question, so please answer earnestly. 

How can a parent change the cause of death on a death certificate? 

More importantly, how can a parent stop the government from changing the cause of death on a death certificate?

Great question, I would be the wrong person to ask, because I do not know. But, I will say this, will there's a will, there's a way. And as dirty as this whole vaccine thing is and has been, I wouldn't put anything past anyone. I would imagine that FEMA would have the connections to make that happen, all they would need is the parents to go along with it. Something like that maybe?

---

"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"

Ernest Ramirez’s 16 year-old son died just five days after getting Pfizer’s Covid vaccine. Mr. Ramirez says FEMA asked him to change his son’s death certificate and in return they offered to pay for the funeral.


https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/16...r-vaccine/

Honest question, so please answer earnestly. 

How can a parent change the cause of death on a death certificate? 

More importantly, how can a parent stop the government from changing the cause of death on certificate?

Nice!

---

Honest question, so please answer earnestly. 

How can a parent change the cause of death on a death certificate? 

More importantly, how can a parent stop the government from changing the cause of death on a death certificate?

Great question, I would be the wrong person to ask, because I do not know. But, I will say this, will there's a will, there's a way. And as dirty as this whole vaccine thing is and has been, I wouldn't put anything past anyone. I would imagine that FEMA would have the connections to make that happen, all they would need is the parents to go along with it. Something like that maybe?

But that's my concern, the dad isn't needed and in fact didn't even have to be contacted. And the dad without the agreement of the certifying physician can't do anything about the listed CoD. This whole thing doesn't make sense. Also, the timing. This happened last spring and the whole thing was in the news at the time, so why is it suddenly on social media again? It's just odd.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

Great question, I would be the wrong person to ask, because I do not know. But, I will say this, will there's a will, there's a way. And as dirty as this whole vaccine thing is and has been, I wouldn't put anything past anyone. I would imagine that FEMA would have the connections to make that happen, all they would need is the parents to go along with it. Something like that maybe?

But that's my concern, the dad isn't needed and in fact didn't even have to be contacted. And the dad without the agreement of the certifying physician can't do anything about the listed CoD. This whole thing doesn't make sense. Also, the timing. This happened last spring and the whole thing was in the news at the time, so why is it suddenly on social media again? It's just odd.

Well, I wasn't there and I did not witness it personally. 

Why would the Dad lie? What does he have to gain? The only ones with anything to gain are the Feds...

---

"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"

But that's my concern, the dad isn't needed and in fact didn't even have to be contacted. And the dad without the agreement of the certifying physician can't do anything about the listed CoD. This whole thing doesn't make sense. Also, the timing. This happened last spring and the whole thing was in the news at the time, so why is it suddenly on social media again? It's just odd.

Well, I wasn't there and I did not witness it personally. 

Why would the Dad lie? What does he have to gain? The only ones with anything to gain are the Feds...

You believe so many false things on the internet.

I’ve seen your twitter feed. It’s really sad.

---

But that's my concern, the dad isn't needed and in fact didn't even have to be contacted. And the dad without the agreement of the certifying physician can't do anything about the listed CoD. This whole thing doesn't make sense. Also, the timing. This happened last spring and the whole thing was in the news at the time, so why is it suddenly on social media again? It's just odd.

Well, I wasn't there and I did not witness it personally. 

Why would the Dad lie? What does he have to gain? The only ones with anything to gain are the Feds...

 I'd say that grief makes people look for someone to blame and this guy suffered a terrible loss. And that his story came out along with his GoFundMe last year and then GFM cancelled him, so I'd say public sympathy and cash. Again it's just odd timing that this is running through the nut-o-sphere again today.

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

In other news, I'm sure this will gain no traction. Pre-print, right?

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/...G--LkOrUIw

Estimated deaths by age range, pre-vaccine across 29 countries:

The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-39 years, 0.035% at 40-49 years, 0.129% at 50-59 years, and 0.501% at 60-69 years.

That vaccine isn't doing [BLEEP] in the younger population. And, since I have to explain everything... it might be doing something... but it's a very little something. There is statistically almost no reason for people under 50 to be taking this thing, and that's assuming the vaccine was 100% effective (but it's not... not even close).

---

If those numbers are even close to being accurate, it's a lower risk for a traffic accident for people under 40.

---

In other news, I'm sure this will gain no traction. Pre-print, right?

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/...G--LkOrUIw

Estimated deaths by age range, pre-vaccine across 29 countries:

The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-39 years, 0.035% at 40-49 years, 0.129% at 50-59 years, and 0.501% at 60-69 years.

That vaccine isn't doing [BLEEP] in the younger population. And, since I have to explain everything... it might be doing something... but it's a very little something. There is statistically almost no reason for people under 50 to be taking this thing, and that's assuming the vaccine was 100% effective (but it's not... not even close).

---

If those numbers are even close to being accurate, it's a lower risk for a traffic accident for people under 40.

Now they are getting ready FORCE kids to take it.

https://twitter.com/KariLake/status/1582...xuOER9zi7g

---

"If you always do what you've always done, You'll always get what you always got"

In other news, I'm sure this will gain no traction. Pre-print, right?

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/...G--LkOrUIw

Estimated deaths by age range, pre-vaccine across 29 countries:

The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-39 years, 0.035% at 40-49 years, 0.129% at 50-59 years, and 0.501% at 60-69 years.

That vaccine isn't doing [BLEEP] in the younger population. And, since I have to explain everything... it might be doing something... but it's a very little something. There is statistically almost no reason for people under 50 to be taking this thing, and that's assuming the vaccine was 100% effective (but it's not... not even close).

---

If those numbers are even close to being accurate, it's a lower risk for a traffic accident for people under 40.

But does vaccinating a person under the age of 50 prevent a different person over the age of 50 (vaccinated or not) from catching it, by reducing transmission overall? I don't know but it doesn't look like this study considered that question.

---

My fellow southpaw Mark Brunell will probably always be my favorite Jaguar.

In other news, I'm sure this will gain no traction. Pre-print, right?

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/...G--LkOrUIw

Estimated deaths by age range, pre-vaccine across 29 countries:

The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-39 years, 0.035% at 40-49 years, 0.129% at 50-59 years, and 0.501% at 60-69 years.

That vaccine isn't doing [BLEEP] in the younger population. And, since I have to explain everything... it might be doing something... but it's a very little something. There is statistically almost no reason for people under 50 to be taking this thing, and that's assuming the vaccine was 100% effective (but it's not... not even close).

---

If those numbers are even close to being accurate, it's a lower risk for a traffic accident for people under 40.

But does vaccinating a person under the age of 50 prevent a different person over the age of 50 (vaccinated or not) from catching it, by reducing transmission overall? I don't know but it doesn't look like this study considered that question.

Another concern, my primary one, is that the fatality rate doesn't evaluate resource utilization to keep those younger cohorts alive when they do catch it. Yeah, they didn't die, but what did it cost to keep them alive and what were the resource tradeoffs to do so?

---

“An empty vessel makes the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest babblers.”. - Plato

In other news, I'm sure this will gain no traction. Pre-print, right?

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/...G--LkOrUIw

Estimated deaths by age range, pre-vaccine across 29 countries:

The median IFR was 0.0003% at 0-19 years, 0.003% at 20-29 years, 0.011% at 30-39 years, 0.035% at 40-49 years, 0.129% at 50-59 years, and 0.501% at 60-69 years.

That vaccine isn't doing [BLEEP] in the younger population. And, since I have to explain everything... it might be doing something... but it's a very little something. There is statistically almost no reason for people under 50 to be taking this thing, and that's assuming the vaccine was 100% effective (but it's not... not even close).

---

If those numbers are even close to being accurate, it's a lower risk for a traffic accident for people under 40.

But does vaccinating a person under the age of 50 prevent a different person over the age of 50 (vaccinated or not) from catching it, by reducing transmission overall? I don't know but it doesn't look like this study considered that question.

I posted somewhere earlier in this thread that the best data we had put it at about a 16% reduction of spread from vaccinated individuals to unvaccinated individuals, and virtually zero difference from unvaccinated individuals to vaccinated ones (meaning unvaccinated and vaccinated spread to vaccinated individuals at the same rate). That was probably over a year ago when I posted that, though. Not sure if there's any updated info.

---

But does vaccinating a person under the age of 50 prevent a different person over the age of 50 (vaccinated or not) from catching it, by reducing transmission overall? I don't know but it doesn't look like this study considered that question.

Another concern, my primary one, is that the fatality rate doesn't evaluate resource utilization to keep those younger cohorts alive when they do catch it. Yeah, they didn't die, but what did it cost to keep them alive and what were the resource tradeoffs to do so?

This is something we SHOULD know, except our medical professionals failed us by not challenging the way the CDC collected data. We just don't have good age restricted data. They stopped after year one when it became clear this wasn't actually a threat to the community at large.

---

OK, I mentioned in another thread about a 36 year old friend of mine that had a heart attack and passed away.... Come to find out, he had 2 heart attacks, one that landed him in the hospital, and one while in the hospital. I recalled a conversation with him we had a while back, seems he got the original COVID Vaccine and the following 2 booster shots...... Now, are these 2 events related? I really have no idea but...... it just seems odd to me that all of these reports that came out about people below 50 years old coming down with heart problems when they had no history of such....... Just my observation and 2 cents worth here.....

---

I think data is really starting to suggest that this vaccine is a terrible choice for men under 40 and a wash for people under 50, but it's hard to state that with certainty, since our process for objectively collecting data was SO bad.

---

Doctor rips White House shielding COVID vaccine data as CDC OKs shot for immunization schedules: Shame on them
Dr. Marty Makary warns recommending the COVID-19 vaccine for children will upend public trust in vaccines

https://www.foxnews.com/media/doctor-rip...ules-shame

---

There is no such thing as the public anymore.

---

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsbTeJOEMg0

---

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_f2KndMzr4

---

"What do I know of cultured ways, the gilt, the craft and the lie? I, who was born in a naked land and bred in the open sky. The subtle tongue, the sophist guile, they fail when the broadswords sing; Rush in and die, dogs - I was a man before I was a king."