The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show significantly less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.
If Caldwell Called You Up On Draft Day...
|
Mack pops in my head first but honestly ill still support anyone he picks at 3.
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Tough Tough question, i would welcome all 3, but IMO a great Defense wins you the big game, a Great Offense makes it fun, give me mack
I have been saying I would take Mack and that they are going to take Mack for months. That being said, the Watkins people have warmed me up on the idea of him. At the end of the day I go Mack because of depth of WR class
“It is the job of thinking people not to be on the side of the executioners.”
― Albert Camus
Quote:Mack but I would be sweating it. Manziel would bring instant media to Jacksonville good or bad. We need that in a bad way. We need people buying his jersey and putting butts in seats. Based on my reading of pre-draft speculation for many years, I can say with near absolute certainty that there is no such thing as a sure thing all pro. But I voted for Mack anyway. Watkins had the one incident with the weed, after which his mother came to live with him at Clemson. So I have a feeling he is going to be okay. As for Manziel, I would prefer not to spend the third overall pick on one of these QBs, especially when there are so many needs at other positions and so many good players to fill those needs.
Do we have a 3 sided coin? I'm okay with all 3 for 3 different reasons.
Watkins could be a different maker for years on offense. Hopefully a true #1 and wishful thinking with Shorts and Blackmom (maybe) Mack looks to be the disruptive force on defense we haven't had in I don't know how long. He looks great Manziel could change the franchise overnight. Could literally change the game or he could put the Jags at the bottom of the league for another 10 years We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today! Quote:I have been saying I would take Mack and that they are going to take Mack for months. That being said, the Watkins people have warmed me up on the idea of him. At the end of the day I go Mack because of depth of WR classthis
What lies behind us, and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us.
Manziel and its not even close to being close.
The Mack & Watkins booster club make me laugh.
it all depends on if mack fits the prototype perfect fit for the LEO spot. if he does, im taking mack. if not, im taking manziel and letting him put some electricity into j ville .
Coughlin when asked if winning will be a focus: "What the hell else is there? This is nice and dandy, but winning is what all this is about."
Quote:Manziel and its not even close to being close. THIS is why people will continue bringing up ridiculous, moronic ideas you vouch for. It isn't enough for you to simply give your opinion, you have to talk a shot at everyone that disagrees with your opinion. Also, what the heck? I thought two months ago, you were highest on Clowney, Mack, and Bridgewater? What gives? We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
Quote:THIS is why people will continue bringing up ridiculous, moronic ideas you vouch for. It isn't enough for you to simply give your opinion, you have to talk a shot at everyone that disagrees with your opinion. Bridgewater wasn't one of the options in this question, was he?? :unsure:
If Caldwell has it down to those three, he must rate Manziel highly. We need a QB much more than any other position, and Manziel would be far and away the most exciting player in the NFL if he succeeds.
It's not even close. "Why should I give information to you when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?"
Manziel this guy is gonna be a star in the league. Everyone doubted Cam Newton look how that turned out
We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
If Caldwell Called You Up On Draft Day... I'd tell him we've already had this conversation a million times and to stop using this number. He knows what he should do, what he needs to do, what he must do. lol.
I want 3 players. Clowney, Bridgewater, Manziel. Jaguars have the number 3 pick. Just give me one of those 3 at 3, and I'm happy.
My top 6 favorite posters on these boards Deacon Pirkster Shack Del Rio Haterade Hurricane Badger
Caldwell has said he drafts the best available player that fits a need IIRC.
QB, WR and pass rusher are all glaring needs on this team. It comes down to which one I think Caldwell would have rated the highest. For me, that's Johnny Manziel. Even if they're close and Johnny is slightly behind one or the other I think QB is the higher need and would bump Johnny up. I'd gladly trade down as far as we could and still take Manziel if possible. I don't like the value at 3 for any player other than Clowney.
Manziel bring him to jville we need a QB more than a WR and this kid excites me
Quote:Manziel bring him to jville we need a QB more than a WR and this kid excites me He'd be one of only 4 picks at 3rd overall that I'd be okay with, the others being Matthews, Bridgewater and Clown. We show less advertisements to registered users. Accounts are free; join today!
With pass rushers Clemons and Watkins joining Babin and Branch, Mack is just less of a need for now. Manziel is a roll of the dice, and I feel a QB can be grabbed later (...although I would not be upset if chosen). The WR corps is the worst in the league without Blackmon. My vote is for Watkins.
No more first round WR, this is WR deep draft. Best available is Mack. End of story.
Quote:With pass rushers Clemons and Watkins joining Babin and Branch, Mack is just less of a need for now. Manziel is a roll of the dice, and I feel a QB can be grabbed later (...although I would not be upset if chosen). The WR corps is the worst in the league without Blackmon. My vote is for Watkins. There will be productive WR to be got all the way up till the 3rd round this draft....maybe even 4th round. I don't see the need to jump at the first good one. Yes, thats right. Just good. |
Users browsing this thread: |
The Jungle is self-supported by showing advertisements via Google Adsense.
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Please consider disabling your advertisement-blocking plugin on the Jungle to help support the site and let us grow!
We also show less advertisements to registered users, so create your account to benefit from this!
Questions or concerns about this ad? Take a screenshot and comment in the thread. We do value your feedback.