... And told you he was going to pick at #3 and he was deciding between Watkins, Manziel and Mack, but wanted your opinion.

 

Which of those three would you select?

---

Mack. 

---

I think Bridgewater at 3 is better value than Mack at 3, yes.

 

<div> 
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL. Clown.
</div>
 
 
 

I would choose Manziel. I can't explain it, I just have a feeling that he will be really good.

---

Mack

---

"Get Better Everyday"

Go big or go home.



JFF.

---

"Before you criticize a man, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot."

Wow... What a unique question that's never been asked before....

---

Out of those three, Mack.

---

Mack but I would be sweating it. Manziel would bring instant media to Jacksonville good or bad. We need that in a bad way. We need people buying his jersey and putting butts in seats.

 

Watkins would be excitement. Mary Jane may run us off because of our past experiences.

 

Mack is a sure thing All Pro

---

All the clues point to them trading down, all the way down to the Blackmon comments.

---

Watkins but not sure he is there

---

Roll the dice on Johnny

---

Watkins. Potentially an all pro WR.

 

Manziel is too hit or miss for me.

 

While I think Mack will be good, I'm not sure he'll be "great"

---

I voted for Mack. It was hard though. Very good question NYC! The reason I chose Mack was because i feel manziel has a few too many question marks. Maybe he's the guy, maybe not. I'd love to see Watkins here, but without the QB, I would say let's just stiffen up the defense. So, in my opinion, it's gotta be Mack amongst those choices.

---

I voted for Mack. It was hard though. Very good question NYC! The reason I chose Mack was because i feel manziel has a few too many question marks. Maybe he's the guy, maybe not. I'd love to see Watkins here, but without the QB, I would say let's just stiffen up the defense. So, in my opinion, it's gotta be Mack amongst those choices.

Thanks, Jaggy.   Obviously one of these guys may not be there at three, but so many mocks have Clowney and an OT going one and two, and Caldwell obviously sees something in Manziel......     so I figure there's a decent chance at least two of these players are sitting there at three and I was very curious who everyone would choose between the three. 

 

Fairly even split so far.  Pretty interesting.

---

Wow... What a unique question that's never been asked before....

And yet you respond every single time!

---

Went with Sammy, Blackmon's year looks to be a wash already.

---

Watkins, give me Garoppolo in the second. 

---

If David Caldwell called me up to ask my opinion on draft day, he'd be looking for work pretty shortly thereafter.

 

Watkins, btw. I'm sold on him as a special player. He might not play as valuable a position as Mack or Booziel, but he's got more talent and is a more dangerous playmaker.

---

Manziel.

---

If David Caldwell called me up to ask my opinion on draft day, he'd be looking for work pretty shortly thereafter.

 

Watkins, btw. I'm sold on him as a special player. He might not play as valuable a position as Mack or Booziel, but he's got more talent and is a more dangerous playmaker.

Watkins plays a more valuable position than Mack on this team.

---